ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Pages with the most revisions
Showing below up to 250 results in range #1 to #250.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- Main Page (706 revisions)
- New Zealand (416 revisions)
- Blackboard inc. (341 revisions)
- Who should see Patent Absurdity in 2010 (315 revisions)
- Books about software and patents (299 revisions)
- Oracle v. Google (2010, USA) (260 revisions)
- EPO EBA referral G3-08 (254 revisions - redirect page)
- Trend Micro v. Barracuda, Fortinet (2008, USA) (247 revisions)
- Borland International (247 revisions)
- Forum shopping (215 revisions)
- Links to be processed (190 revisions)
- I4i v. Microsoft (2009, USA) (183 revisions)
- Why abolish software patents (183 revisions)
- Bilski brainstorming (179 revisions)
- Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA) (178 revisions)
- Google (176 revisions)
- Unified Patent Court (172 revisions)
- 201001 acta.pdf as text (171 revisions)
- Please help find these documents (163 revisions)
- Australia (160 revisions)
- The EuroLinux petition (154 revisions)
- In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008 (136 revisions)
- Who should see Patent Absurdity in New Zealand (135 revisions)
- Apple Inc. (133 revisions)
- Microsoft (133 revisions)
- Patent troll (133 revisions)
- Choosing words to use in legal proposals (132 revisions)
- Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014 (124 revisions)
- Case law in the UK (122 revisions)
- News 2010 (121 revisions)
- Studies on economics and innovation (118 revisions)
- List of lawsuits (112 revisions)
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview (106 revisions)
- Case law in the USA (104 revisions)
- EPO EBoA referral G3-08 (102 revisions)
- MPEG LA (101 revisions)
- Business Software Alliance (100 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/English (96 revisions)
- Sandbox (95 revisions)
- Harm to standards and compatibility (93 revisions)
- WebM, VP8 and VP9 (93 revisions)
- Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010 (91 revisions)
- ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text (88 revisions)
- European Patent Office (87 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Русский (Russian) (86 revisions)
- Free software (83 revisions)
- Example software patents (82 revisions)
- Audio-video patents (81 revisions)
- HTML5 and video patents (79 revisions)
- Open Invention Network (77 revisions)
- Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs (75 revisions)
- Current events (74 revisions)
- Software does not make a computer a new machine (72 revisions)
- Free software projects harmed by software patents (71 revisions)
- .NET, C-sharp, and Mono (70 revisions)
- India (70 revisions)
- Australian consultation responses 2009 (68 revisions)
- Related Wikipedia articles (67 revisions)
- Patent clauses in software licenses (66 revisions)
- United States Patent and Trademark Office (66 revisions)
- Case law (65 revisions)
- South Africa (65 revisions)
- Software patents (64 revisions)
- Insurance against patent litigation (63 revisions)
- Case law in Germany (62 revisions)
- Symbian ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 8 October 2008 (61 revisions)
- Finding things on en.swpat.org (61 revisions)
- Particular machine or transformation (60 revisions)
- CSIRO wifi patent (60 revisions)
- United States of America (58 revisions)
- All businesses have software patent risk (58 revisions)
- Software patent quality worse than all other fields (58 revisions)
- Publishing information is made dangerous (57 revisions)
- List of recordings and transcripts (57 revisions)
- Red Hat (56 revisions)
- Statements from venture capitalists (56 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity (56 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Français (French) (55 revisions)
- Blocking innovation and research (55 revisions)
- Apple v. HTC (2010, USA) (55 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Español (Spanish) (55 revisions)
- Germany (54 revisions)
- TRIPS Agreement (54 revisions)
- Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA) (54 revisions)
- Legislation in the USA (54 revisions)
- USPTO 2010 consultation (53 revisions)
- Patent review by the public (53 revisions)
- Supreme Court of the United States (53 revisions)
- Why software is different (53 revisions)
- European Patent Convention (52 revisions)
- Disclosure is unreadable (52 revisions)
- Timeline (52 revisions)
- Freedom of expression (51 revisions)
- Bilski overview (51 revisions)
- Microsoft FAT patents (50 revisions)
- Phone patent litigation (50 revisions)
- Belgium (50 revisions)
- Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 (50 revisions)
- Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (49 revisions)
- Infringement is unavoidable and clearance is impossible (49 revisions)
- Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA) (48 revisions)
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (48 revisions)
- Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (48 revisions)
- Software patents harm SMEs (47 revisions)
- EU software patents directive (47 revisions)
- Oracle v. SAP (2010, USA) (46 revisions)
- Microsoft royalty demands for Android and other non-Microsoft software (46 revisions)
- Harm caused by all types of patents (45 revisions)
- France (45 revisions)
- Microsoft Community Promise, and the OSP (45 revisions)
- Software Tree LLC (Acacia) v. Red Hat (2009, USA) (45 revisions)
- United Kingdom (45 revisions)
- Raising examination standards (45 revisions)
- Software is math (45 revisions)
- German patent courts and appeals (44 revisions)
- Israel (44 revisions)
- Canada (44 revisions)
- United Patent Litigation System (44 revisions)
- End Software Patents (44 revisions)
- Invalidating harmful patents (44 revisions)
- Countries and regions (44 revisions)
- Drafting the next US amicus brief (43 revisions)
- U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many (2009, USA) (42 revisions)
- Blanket patent licences and promises (42 revisions)
- Ireland (42 revisions)
- Examples of use for sabotage (42 revisions)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (42 revisions)
- Japan (42 revisions)
- John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents (41 revisions)
- Patentability in the USA after Bilski (41 revisions)
- Our goals (41 revisions)
- Shielding software from litigation (40 revisions)
- KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 (40 revisions)
- Antitrust law (39 revisions)
- Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA) (39 revisions)
- Ogg Theora (39 revisions)
- Analogies (38 revisions)
- Business method patents (38 revisions)
- Brazil (38 revisions)
- Interoperability exception (38 revisions)
- Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010 (38 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Subtitles (38 revisions)
- Costly legal costs (37 revisions)
- Software patents exist in Europe, kinda (37 revisions)
- Defensive publication and prior art databases (37 revisions)
- Mirror Worlds v. Apple (2008, USA) (37 revisions)
- America Invents Act (37 revisions)
- IBM v. TurboHercules in 2010 (36 revisions)
- How to read patents (36 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Italiano (Italian) (35 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/简体中文 (Simplified Chinese) (35 revisions)
- Defensive patent acquisition (35 revisions)
- Sun Microsystems inc. (35 revisions)
- In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994 (35 revisions)
- Amazon's one-click shopping patent (35 revisions)
- CPTN Holdings LLC (35 revisions)
- Richard Stallman on software patents (35 revisions)
- Defensive patent pools (34 revisions)
- Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981 (34 revisions)
- OpenGL (34 revisions)
- Making leaflets (34 revisions)
- Micro-blogging patents (34 revisions)
- Blocking competing software (33 revisions)
- Harmonization of European patent systems (33 revisions)
- UK patent courts and appeals (33 revisions)
- United States International Trade Commission (33 revisions)
- IBM (32 revisions)
- W3C (32 revisions)
- United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (32 revisions)
- European Patent Office grants software patents (32 revisions)
- Java and patents (32 revisions)
- Canonical Group (32 revisions)
- Uniloc v. Microsoft (2009, USA) (31 revisions)
- Oracle (31 revisions)
- Patent lawyers (31 revisions)
- Corruption and bullying (31 revisions)
- State Street ruling by US CAFC on 23 July 1998 (31 revisions)
- Why focus only on software (31 revisions)
- Argentina (30 revisions)
- ACTA and software patents (30 revisions)
- Patent non-aggression pacts (30 revisions)
- NZICT (30 revisions)
- Timothy B. Lee on software patents (29 revisions)
- Use software and functionality from 20 years ago (29 revisions)
- Campaign for Creativity (29 revisions)
- Storyline and fashion patents (29 revisions)
- European Union (29 revisions)
- Z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk (2006, USA) (28 revisions)
- Comparing Java to .Net and C-sharp (28 revisions)
- The value of promises and estoppel defences (28 revisions)
- Harm without litigation or direct threats (28 revisions)
- European Patent Litigation Agreement (28 revisions)
- Criteria for patentability (28 revisions)
- Category tree (28 revisions)
- Cost of getting patents and maintaining them (28 revisions)
- Intellectual Ventures (28 revisions)
- Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 27 October 2006 (27 revisions)
- IBM and MS deciding New Zealand legislation (27 revisions)
- USA patent courts and appeals (27 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Português do Brasil (Brazilian Portuguese) (27 revisions)
- Cost barrier to market entry (27 revisions)
- 2009 patent litigation study (27 revisions)
- Venezuela (27 revisions)
- Patents Act 2013 (27 revisions)
- Calculating damages and legal fees in the USA (26 revisions)
- Fake representatives of free software (26 revisions)
- NetApp filesystem patents (26 revisions - redirect page)
- Open letter on Australian software patents (26 revisions)
- Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property" (26 revisions)
- Design patent (26 revisions)
- More than innovation (25 revisions)
- US government (25 revisions)
- Some SMEs like software patents myth (25 revisions)
- Bilski's patent application text (25 revisions)
- Finland (25 revisions)
- Webpages that disappeared (25 revisions)
- Consultations from government bodies and courts (24 revisions)
- FSF (24 revisions - redirect page)
- InNova v. 36 companies (2010, USA) (24 revisions)
- Siemens ruling by German BGH on 22 April 2010 (24 revisions)
- Novell (24 revisions)
- Mexico (24 revisions)
- 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey (24 revisions)
- Searching for patents (24 revisions)
- Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972 (24 revisions)
- Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08 (24 revisions)
- Rethinking the European ICT agenda (23 revisions)
- Acacia Research Corporation (23 revisions)
- Patent ambush (23 revisions)
- Sweden (23 revisions)
- Anti-lock braking example (23 revisions)
- First-to-file or first-to-invent (22 revisions)
- Software progress happens without patents (22 revisions)
- Implicit patent licence (22 revisions)
- A bubble waiting to burst (22 revisions)
- Uruguay (22 revisions)
- Do software patents exist in my area (22 revisions)
- Patentable subject matter (22 revisions)
- Which sectors are for and against (22 revisions)
- Sources of software patent news (22 revisions)
- 20 years is too long (22 revisions)
- Changing company patent policies (22 revisions)
- Tim Bray on software patents (22 revisions)
- Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA) (22 revisions)
- Duds and non-solutions (22 revisions)
- Costa Rica (22 revisions)
- FRAND (22 revisions)
- Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents (21 revisions)
- German parliament petition against software patents (21 revisions)
- Groklaw (21 revisions)
