ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Pages with the most revisions
Showing below up to 100 results in range #1 to #100.
View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- Main Page (706 revisions)
- New Zealand (416 revisions)
- Blackboard inc. (341 revisions)
- Who should see Patent Absurdity in 2010 (315 revisions)
- Books about software and patents (299 revisions)
- Oracle v. Google (2010, USA) (260 revisions)
- EPO EBA referral G3-08 (254 revisions - redirect page)
- Trend Micro v. Barracuda, Fortinet (2008, USA) (247 revisions)
- Borland International (247 revisions)
- Forum shopping (215 revisions)
- Links to be processed (190 revisions)
- Why abolish software patents (183 revisions)
- I4i v. Microsoft (2009, USA) (183 revisions)
- Bilski brainstorming (179 revisions)
- Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA) (178 revisions)
- Google (176 revisions)
- Unified Patent Court (172 revisions)
- 201001 acta.pdf as text (171 revisions)
- Please help find these documents (163 revisions)
- Australia (160 revisions)
- The EuroLinux petition (154 revisions)
- In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008 (136 revisions)
- Who should see Patent Absurdity in New Zealand (135 revisions)
- Apple Inc. (133 revisions)
- Microsoft (133 revisions)
- Patent troll (133 revisions)
- Choosing words to use in legal proposals (132 revisions)
- Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014 (124 revisions)
- Case law in the UK (122 revisions)
- News 2010 (121 revisions)
- Studies on economics and innovation (118 revisions)
- List of lawsuits (112 revisions)
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview (106 revisions)
- Case law in the USA (104 revisions)
- EPO EBoA referral G3-08 (102 revisions)
- MPEG LA (101 revisions)
- Business Software Alliance (100 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/English (96 revisions)
- Sandbox (95 revisions)
- Harm to standards and compatibility (93 revisions)
- WebM, VP8 and VP9 (93 revisions)
- Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010 (91 revisions)
- ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text (88 revisions)
- European Patent Office (87 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Русский (Russian) (86 revisions)
- Free software (83 revisions)
- Example software patents (82 revisions)
- Audio-video patents (81 revisions)
- HTML5 and video patents (79 revisions)
- Open Invention Network (77 revisions)
- Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs (75 revisions)
- Current events (74 revisions)
- Software does not make a computer a new machine (72 revisions)
- Free software projects harmed by software patents (71 revisions)
- .NET, C-sharp, and Mono (70 revisions)
- India (70 revisions)
- Australian consultation responses 2009 (68 revisions)
- Related Wikipedia articles (67 revisions)
- Patent clauses in software licenses (66 revisions)
- United States Patent and Trademark Office (66 revisions)
- Case law (65 revisions)
- South Africa (65 revisions)
- Software patents (64 revisions)
- Insurance against patent litigation (63 revisions)
- Case law in Germany (62 revisions)
- Symbian ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 8 October 2008 (61 revisions)
- Finding things on en.swpat.org (61 revisions)
- Particular machine or transformation (60 revisions)
- CSIRO wifi patent (60 revisions)
- United States of America (58 revisions)
- All businesses have software patent risk (58 revisions)
- Software patent quality worse than all other fields (58 revisions)
- Publishing information is made dangerous (57 revisions)
- List of recordings and transcripts (57 revisions)
- Red Hat (56 revisions)
- Statements from venture capitalists (56 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity (56 revisions)
- Blocking innovation and research (55 revisions)
- Apple v. HTC (2010, USA) (55 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Español (Spanish) (55 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Français (French) (55 revisions)
- Germany (54 revisions)
- TRIPS Agreement (54 revisions)
- Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA) (54 revisions)
- Legislation in the USA (54 revisions)
- USPTO 2010 consultation (53 revisions)
- Patent review by the public (53 revisions)
- Why software is different (53 revisions)
- Supreme Court of the United States (53 revisions)
- European Patent Convention (52 revisions)
- Disclosure is unreadable (52 revisions)
- Timeline (52 revisions)
- Freedom of expression (51 revisions)
- Bilski overview (51 revisions)
- Microsoft FAT patents (50 revisions)
- Phone patent litigation (50 revisions)
- Belgium (50 revisions)
- Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 (50 revisions)
- Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (49 revisions)
- Infringement is unavoidable and clearance is impossible (49 revisions)