ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Long pages

Showing below up to 250 results in range #1 to #250.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. (hist) ‎201001 acta.pdf as text ‎[191,225 bytes]
  2. (hist) ‎ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text ‎[89,892 bytes]
  3. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/日本語 (Japanese) ‎[69,306 bytes]
  4. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Ελληνικά (Greek) ‎[66,313 bytes]
  5. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Русский (Russian) ‎[56,899 bytes]
  6. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Persian ‎[54,299 bytes]
  7. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Français (French) ‎[47,433 bytes]
  8. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/English ‎[44,458 bytes]
  9. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/עברית (Hebrew) ‎[40,708 bytes]
  10. (hist) ‎Oracle v. Google (2010, USA) ‎[39,673 bytes]
  11. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Українська (Ukrainian) ‎[38,244 bytes]
  12. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Italiano (Italian) ‎[37,263 bytes]
  13. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Español-Bolivia (Spanish) ‎[35,010 bytes]
  14. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Română (Romanian) ‎[34,980 bytes]
  15. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/한국어 (Korean) ‎[34,869 bytes]
  16. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Español (Spanish) ‎[32,926 bytes]
  17. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/简体中文 (Simplified Chinese) ‎[32,158 bytes]
  18. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Polski (Polish) ‎[31,920 bytes]
  19. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Suomi (Finnish) ‎[31,798 bytes]
  20. (hist) ‎Harmonization of European patent systems ‎[28,690 bytes]
  21. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Svenska (Swedish) ‎[27,187 bytes]
  22. (hist) ‎Who should see Patent Absurdity in 2010 ‎[25,075 bytes]
  23. (hist) ‎Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014 ‎[24,523 bytes]
  24. (hist) ‎Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08 ‎[23,547 bytes]
  25. (hist) ‎Shielding software from litigation ‎[21,190 bytes]
  26. (hist) ‎Why abolish software patents ‎[21,034 bytes]
  27. (hist) ‎Bilski brainstorming ‎[20,504 bytes]
  28. (hist) ‎Australian consultation responses 2009 ‎[19,224 bytes]
  29. (hist) ‎Australia ‎[18,130 bytes]
  30. (hist) ‎Links to be processed ‎[16,745 bytes]
  31. (hist) ‎Workspace: A house that computes (analogy) ‎[16,510 bytes]
  32. (hist) ‎I4i v. Microsoft (2009, USA) ‎[15,415 bytes]
  33. (hist) ‎Microsoft ‎[14,761 bytes]
  34. (hist) ‎Patents Act 2013 ‎[14,748 bytes]
  35. (hist) ‎Patent Cooperation Treaty ‎[13,930 bytes]
  36. (hist) ‎Another Parable of the Cave: progress in knowledge untethered to scarcities is promoted through increased access ‎[13,591 bytes]
  37. (hist) ‎Patent troll ‎[13,202 bytes]
  38. (hist) ‎Why software is different ‎[13,061 bytes]
  39. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Português do Brasil (Brazilian Portuguese) ‎[12,753 bytes]
  40. (hist) ‎Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010 ‎[12,436 bytes]
  41. (hist) ‎Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview ‎[12,413 bytes]
  42. (hist) ‎Patent clauses in software licenses ‎[12,016 bytes]
  43. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Dansk (Danish) ‎[11,485 bytes]
  44. (hist) ‎Asymmetric numeral systems ‎[11,281 bytes]
  45. (hist) ‎Choosing words to use in legal proposals ‎[11,183 bytes]
  46. (hist) ‎Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs ‎[10,982 bytes]
  47. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity/Deutsch (German) ‎[10,892 bytes]
  48. (hist) ‎Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA) ‎[10,633 bytes]
  49. (hist) ‎Letter to the European Commission's proposal for a Regulation on standard-essential patents ‎[10,309 bytes]
  50. (hist) ‎Open Invention Network ‎[10,281 bytes]
  51. (hist) ‎Martin Goetz ‎[10,234 bytes]
  52. (hist) ‎Case law in Germany ‎[10,103 bytes]
  53. (hist) ‎Case law in the UK ‎[9,889 bytes]
  54. (hist) ‎Google ‎[9,820 bytes]
  55. (hist) ‎MPEG LA ‎[9,614 bytes]
  56. (hist) ‎TRIPS Agreement ‎[9,586 bytes]
  57. (hist) ‎Free software projects harmed by software patents ‎[9,367 bytes]
  58. (hist) ‎Unified Patent Court ‎[9,290 bytes]
  59. (hist) ‎Reducing patent duration ‎[9,233 bytes]
  60. (hist) ‎IBM and MS deciding New Zealand legislation ‎[9,175 bytes]
  61. (hist) ‎Symbian ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 8 October 2008 ‎[9,172 bytes]
  62. (hist) ‎Freedom of expression ‎[8,948 bytes]
  63. (hist) ‎Analogies ‎[8,776 bytes]
  64. (hist) ‎How to read patents ‎[8,665 bytes]
  65. (hist) ‎European Patent Convention ‎[8,608 bytes]
  66. (hist) ‎In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008 ‎[8,423 bytes]
  67. (hist) ‎Free software ‎[8,231 bytes]
  68. (hist) ‎Legislation in the USA ‎[8,142 bytes]
  69. (hist) ‎European Patent Office ‎[8,077 bytes]
  70. (hist) ‎Bilski's patent application text ‎[8,074 bytes]
  71. (hist) ‎Example software patents ‎[8,067 bytes]
  72. (hist) ‎Harm caused by all types of patents ‎[8,007 bytes]
  73. (hist) ‎United Patent Litigation System ‎[7,985 bytes]
  74. (hist) ‎Mayo ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 March 2012 ‎[7,919 bytes]
  75. (hist) ‎MPL and patents ‎[7,893 bytes]
  76. (hist) ‎Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010 ‎[7,857 bytes]
  77. (hist) ‎Supreme Court of the United States ‎[7,831 bytes]
  78. (hist) ‎CSIRO wifi patent ‎[7,758 bytes]
  79. (hist) ‎ESP's brief for EPO referral G3-08 ‎[7,752 bytes]
  80. (hist) ‎EPO case law ‎[7,747 bytes]
  81. (hist) ‎Electronic Frontier Foundation ‎[7,746 bytes]
  82. (hist) ‎Drafting the next US amicus brief ‎[7,712 bytes]
  83. (hist) ‎Main Page ‎[7,690 bytes]
  84. (hist) ‎Gowers Review of Intellectual Property ‎[7,587 bytes]
  85. (hist) ‎In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994 ‎[7,427 bytes]
  86. (hist) ‎Apple Inc. ‎[7,353 bytes]
  87. (hist) ‎Israel ‎[7,297 bytes]
  88. (hist) ‎India ‎[7,296 bytes]
  89. (hist) ‎Implicit patent licence ‎[7,201 bytes]
  90. (hist) ‎Java and patents ‎[7,149 bytes]
  91. (hist) ‎Eurasian Patent Convention ‎[6,999 bytes]
  92. (hist) ‎Raising examination standards ‎[6,898 bytes]
  93. (hist) ‎Amazon's one-click shopping patent ‎[6,864 bytes]
  94. (hist) ‎.NET, C-sharp, and Mono ‎[6,863 bytes]
  95. (hist) ‎WebM, VP8 and VP9 ‎[6,732 bytes]
  96. (hist) ‎NetApp's filesystem patents ‎[6,719 bytes]
  97. (hist) ‎Red Hat ‎[6,697 bytes]
  98. (hist) ‎Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 ‎[6,622 bytes]
  99. (hist) ‎Richard Posner on software patents ‎[6,583 bytes]
  100. (hist) ‎Studies on economics and innovation ‎[6,458 bytes]
  101. (hist) ‎The value of promises and estoppel defences ‎[6,420 bytes]
  102. (hist) ‎Software does not make a computer a new machine ‎[6,399 bytes]
  103. (hist) ‎Timothy B. Lee on software patents ‎[6,370 bytes]
  104. (hist) ‎EPO EBoA referral G3-08 ‎[6,368 bytes]
  105. (hist) ‎Settled expectations ‎[6,337 bytes]
  106. (hist) ‎Infringement is unavoidable and clearance is impossible ‎[6,327 bytes]
  107. (hist) ‎Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 27 October 2006 ‎[6,316 bytes]
  108. (hist) ‎United States Patent and Trademark Office ‎[6,296 bytes]
  109. (hist) ‎Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA) ‎[6,134 bytes]
  110. (hist) ‎Software is math ‎[6,105 bytes]
  111. (hist) ‎United States International Trade Commission ‎[6,059 bytes]
  112. (hist) ‎Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA) ‎[5,997 bytes]
  113. (hist) ‎Software patents exist in Europe, kinda ‎[5,981 bytes]
  114. (hist) ‎U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many (2009, USA) ‎[5,948 bytes]
  115. (hist) ‎News 2010 ‎[5,937 bytes]
  116. (hist) ‎ESP report February 2011 ‎[5,930 bytes]
  117. (hist) ‎Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement ‎[5,880 bytes]
  118. (hist) ‎Forum shopping ‎[5,822 bytes]
  119. (hist) ‎Examples of use for sabotage ‎[5,810 bytes]
  120. (hist) ‎US government ‎[5,776 bytes]
  121. (hist) ‎Category tree ‎[5,698 bytes]
  122. (hist) ‎Microsoft royalty demands for Android and other non-Microsoft software ‎[5,690 bytes]
  123. (hist) ‎United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ‎[5,614 bytes]
  124. (hist) ‎Open letter on Australian software patents ‎[5,600 bytes]
  125. (hist) ‎CPTN Holdings LLC ‎[5,582 bytes]
  126. (hist) ‎Harm to standards and compatibility ‎[5,412 bytes]
  127. (hist) ‎IBM v. TurboHercules in 2010 ‎[5,411 bytes]
  128. (hist) ‎In re Spansion by US Third Circuit on 21 December 2012 ‎[5,403 bytes]
  129. (hist) ‎Cost of getting patents and maintaining them ‎[5,330 bytes]
  130. (hist) ‎USA patent courts and appeals ‎[5,307 bytes]
  131. (hist) ‎United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office ‎[5,276 bytes]
  132. (hist) ‎FRAND ‎[5,232 bytes]
  133. (hist) ‎Germany ‎[5,219 bytes]
  134. (hist) ‎Audio-video patents ‎[5,191 bytes]
  135. (hist) ‎State Street ruling by US CAFC on 23 July 1998 ‎[5,181 bytes]
  136. (hist) ‎EPO G3-08 brainstorming ‎[5,167 bytes]
  137. (hist) ‎Africa ‎[5,160 bytes]
  138. (hist) ‎France ‎[5,144 bytes]
  139. (hist) ‎Apple v. HTC (2010, USA) ‎[5,095 bytes]
  140. (hist) ‎Novell ‎[5,063 bytes]
  141. (hist) ‎Japan ‎[5,061 bytes]
  142. (hist) ‎Phone patent litigation ‎[5,054 bytes]
  143. (hist) ‎Intellectual Ventures ‎[5,053 bytes]
  144. (hist) ‎Criteria for patentability ‎[5,025 bytes]
  145. (hist) ‎Microsoft FAT patents ‎[5,015 bytes]
  146. (hist) ‎John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents ‎[4,987 bytes]
  147. (hist) ‎Suggestions for the USPTO in 2013 ‎[4,973 bytes]
  148. (hist) ‎ACTA and software patents ‎[4,930 bytes]
  149. (hist) ‎SAS ruling by EU Court of Justice on 2 May 2012 ‎[4,916 bytes]
  150. (hist) ‎EU software patents directive ‎[4,911 bytes]
  151. (hist) ‎Patent Quality and Settlement Among Repeat Patent Litigants ‎[4,892 bytes]
  152. (hist) ‎Specialised patent court ‎[4,891 bytes]
  153. (hist) ‎German patent courts and appeals ‎[4,884 bytes]
  154. (hist) ‎Patent non-aggression pacts ‎[4,862 bytes]
  155. (hist) ‎Invalidating harmful patents ‎[4,855 bytes]
  156. (hist) ‎Ireland ‎[4,839 bytes]
  157. (hist) ‎European Commission answer to P-010463-12 ‎[4,823 bytes]
  158. (hist) ‎Blocking innovation and research ‎[4,817 bytes]
  159. (hist) ‎Harvard 2019 study on government technology policy effects ‎[4,777 bytes]
  160. (hist) ‎Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure ‎[4,759 bytes]
  161. (hist) ‎2008 Berkeley Patent Survey ‎[4,757 bytes]
  162. (hist) ‎Canada ‎[4,734 bytes]
  163. (hist) ‎Statements from venture capitalists ‎[4,714 bytes]
  164. (hist) ‎IBM ‎[4,689 bytes]
  165. (hist) ‎Comparing Java to .Net and C-sharp ‎[4,681 bytes]
  166. (hist) ‎Patentability in the USA after Bilski ‎[4,663 bytes]
  167. (hist) ‎Case law in Australia ‎[4,662 bytes]
  168. (hist) ‎Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents ‎[4,661 bytes]
  169. (hist) ‎USPTO 2010 consultation ‎[4,651 bytes]
  170. (hist) ‎Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property" ‎[4,611 bytes]
  171. (hist) ‎Searching for patents ‎[4,610 bytes]
  172. (hist) ‎SAP ‎[4,558 bytes]
  173. (hist) ‎Cost of the patent system to governments ‎[4,545 bytes]
  174. (hist) ‎Andean Community ‎[4,539 bytes]
  175. (hist) ‎Alice v. CLS Bank amicus briefs ‎[4,530 bytes]
  176. (hist) ‎Patent Absurdity ‎[4,414 bytes]
  177. (hist) ‎Oracle v. SAP (2010, USA) ‎[4,404 bytes]
  178. (hist) ‎Changes in company policy over time ‎[4,367 bytes]
  179. (hist) ‎Case law in the USA ‎[4,322 bytes]
  180. (hist) ‎As such ‎[4,320 bytes]
  181. (hist) ‎OpenGL ‎[4,262 bytes]
  182. (hist) ‎Blackboard inc. ‎[4,252 bytes]
  183. (hist) ‎Software patents ‎[4,249 bytes]
  184. (hist) ‎United Kingdom ‎[4,228 bytes]
  185. (hist) ‎GNU General Public License Version 2 ‎[4,226 bytes]
  186. (hist) ‎Unitary patent ‎[4,215 bytes]
  187. (hist) ‎Oracle ‎[4,175 bytes]
  188. (hist) ‎Countries and regions ‎[4,162 bytes]
  189. (hist) ‎New Zealand ‎[4,144 bytes]
  190. (hist) ‎Disclosure is unreadable ‎[4,107 bytes]
  191. (hist) ‎Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981 ‎[4,099 bytes]
  192. (hist) ‎Please help find these documents ‎[4,095 bytes]
  193. (hist) ‎South Africa ‎[4,084 bytes]
  194. (hist) ‎Use software and functionality from 20 years ago ‎[4,039 bytes]
  195. (hist) ‎Defensive publication and prior art databases ‎[4,031 bytes]
  196. (hist) ‎Interval Licensing v. 11 big companies (2010, USA) ‎[4,004 bytes]
  197. (hist) ‎Timeline ‎[4,003 bytes]
  198. (hist) ‎Blanket patent licences and promises ‎[3,986 bytes]
  199. (hist) ‎Belgium ‎[3,978 bytes]
  200. (hist) ‎Software patents harm SMEs ‎[3,941 bytes]
  201. (hist) ‎Costly legal costs ‎[3,930 bytes]
  202. (hist) ‎Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act ‎[3,893 bytes]
  203. (hist) ‎HTML5 and video patents ‎[3,887 bytes]
  204. (hist) ‎Mp3 ‎[3,822 bytes]
  205. (hist) ‎List of lawsuits ‎[3,820 bytes]
  206. (hist) ‎Machine translation of patents ‎[3,796 bytes]
  207. (hist) ‎Workspace for Canada 1-click appeal ‎[3,745 bytes]
  208. (hist) ‎Patent review by the public ‎[3,743 bytes]
  209. (hist) ‎UK patent courts and appeals ‎[3,742 bytes]
  210. (hist) ‎Free software exception ‎[3,695 bytes]
  211. (hist) ‎Terminology recommendations ‎[3,694 bytes]
  212. (hist) ‎Acacia v. Red Hat and Novell (2010, USA) ‎[3,653 bytes]
  213. (hist) ‎America Invents Act ‎[3,642 bytes]
  214. (hist) ‎Gulf Cooperation Council ‎[3,627 bytes]
  215. (hist) ‎Pen and paper patents ‎[3,606 bytes]
  216. (hist) ‎Webpages that disappeared ‎[3,602 bytes]
  217. (hist) ‎Fake representatives of free software ‎[3,599 bytes]
  218. (hist) ‎Microsoft FAT ruling by German BGH on 20 April 2010 ‎[3,578 bytes]
  219. (hist) ‎Bangui Agreement ‎[3,529 bytes]
  220. (hist) ‎Storyline and fashion patents ‎[3,508 bytes]
  221. (hist) ‎Trend Micro v. Barracuda, Fortinet (2008, USA) ‎[3,506 bytes]
  222. (hist) ‎End Software Patents ‎[3,504 bytes]
  223. (hist) ‎More than patent trolls ‎[3,478 bytes]
  224. (hist) ‎Uruguay ‎[3,460 bytes]
  225. (hist) ‎Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972 ‎[3,443 bytes]
  226. (hist) ‎Calculating damages and legal fees in the USA ‎[3,439 bytes]
  227. (hist) ‎Bill Gates on software patents ‎[3,417 bytes]
  228. (hist) ‎Inequality between small and large patent holders ‎[3,414 bytes]
  229. (hist) ‎Current events ‎[3,401 bytes]
  230. (hist) ‎Controllable forces of nature ‎[3,374 bytes]
  231. (hist) ‎I4i v. Microsoft ruling by the US Supreme Court on 9 June 2011 ‎[3,362 bytes]
  232. (hist) ‎Consulta brasileira do escritório de patentes 2012 ‎[3,358 bytes]
  233. (hist) ‎Ogg Theora ‎[3,347 bytes]
  234. (hist) ‎Brazil ‎[3,331 bytes]
  235. (hist) ‎NZICT ‎[3,300 bytes]
  236. (hist) ‎Some SMEs like software patents myth ‎[3,284 bytes]
  237. (hist) ‎Particular machine or transformation ‎[3,253 bytes]
  238. (hist) ‎European Patent Office grants software patents ‎[3,245 bytes]
  239. (hist) ‎Antitrust law ‎[3,242 bytes]
  240. (hist) ‎Brasil ‎[3,239 bytes]
  241. (hist) ‎Minor reform proposals in the USA ‎[3,215 bytes]
  242. (hist) ‎2008 State of Software Patents ‎[3,208 bytes]
  243. (hist) ‎Patent standards here are higher than in the USA ‎[3,204 bytes]
  244. (hist) ‎Invalid patents remain unchallenged ‎[3,190 bytes]
  245. (hist) ‎Silly patents ‎[3,185 bytes]
  246. (hist) ‎Publishing information is made dangerous ‎[3,160 bytes]
  247. (hist) ‎German parliament petition against software patents ‎[3,156 bytes]
  248. (hist) ‎List of recordings and transcripts ‎[3,153 bytes]
  249. (hist) ‎More than innovation ‎[3,149 bytes]
  250. (hist) ‎Microsoft Community Promise, and the OSP ‎[3,142 bytes]

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)