ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
All pages
- Patents are too expensive for individuals
- Patents are too expensive for many software developers
- Pen and paper patents
- People
- Per se
- Philip Leith
- Philip Leith on software patents
- Philippines
- Philips
- Phone patent litigation
- Please help find these documents
- Poland
- Polski
- Portal:Economic Parasites
- Português (Brasil)
- Pragmatus AV v. YouTube, Facebook, etc. (2010, USA)
- Presentation slides
- President's Commission on the Patent System
- Presidents Commission on the Patent System
- Preventing competition
- Preventing competition and entrenching Monopolies
- Preventing competition and entrenching monopolies
- Preventing software development, reducing choice
- Prior-art
- Prior-art database
- Prior art
- Prior art database
- Prior art database and defensive publication
- Pro-patent bias in courts
- Promises to employees
- Protecting small inventors myth
- Protection
- PubPat
- Public Patent Foundation
- Publishing information is made dangerous
- Quality of software patents is particularly bad
- Quanta v. LGE (2008, USA)
- Quanta v. LGE ruling by US Supreme Court on 9 June 2008
- Quanta v. LGE ruling by the US Supreme Court on 9 June 2008
- RAND
- RSA
- RSA algorithm
- RSA patent
- Raising examination standards
- Raising examination standards wouldn't fix much
- Raising standards is not our goal
- Rapid Type Analysis
- Reading case law
- Red Hat
- Red hat
- Redhat
- Reducing innovation and research
- Reducing patent duration
- Reform is not enough
- Reissued patent
- Related Wikipedia articles
- Removing useful software from the market
- Rethinking the European ICT agenda
- Richard Posner
- Richard Posner on software patents
- Richard Stallman
- Richard Stallman on software patents
- Risks of supporting partial solutions
- Rockstar
- Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents
- Română
- Russia
- S3 Graphics v. Apple (2011, USA)
- SAP
- SAS Institute ruling by EU Court of Justice expected in 2012
- SAS ruling by EU Court of Justice on 2 May 2012
- SCOTUS
- SFLC
- SGI
- SGI and Graphics Properties Holdings Inc.
- SHIELD
- SME
- SMEs
- SUEPO
- Samsung
- Samsung Electronics
- Samsung v. Apple (2011, France)
- Samsung v. Apple (2011, Germany)
- Samsung v. Apple (2011, USA)
- Samsung v. Apple 2011 lawsuits worldwide overview
- Samsung v. Apple lawsuits worldwide overview
- Sandbox
- Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act
- Say No Problem to Snow With a Pair of Brown Flat Boots
- Searching for and reading patents
- Searching for patents
- Security, encryption and spam solution patents
- Settled expectations
- Shield software from litigation
- Shield software from patent litigation
- Shielding software from litigation
- Shielding software instead of exempting it
- Should the whole patent system be axed
- Siemens
- Siemens AG
- Siemens ruling by German BGH on 22 April 2010
- Silicon Graphics
- Silicon Graphics Inc
- Silly patents
- Simon Phipps
- Simon Phipps on software patents
- Sisvel
- Slashdot
- Slow process creates uncertainty
- Small Serial Innovators: The Small Firm Contribution To Technical Change
- Small businesses
- Software-patent
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- Software Freedom Law Center
- Software Patents: A Time for Change
- Software Patents Directive
- Software Tree LLC (Acacia) v. Red Hat (2009, USA)
- Software Tree v. Red Hat (2009, USA)
- Software Tree vs Red Hat, 2009
- Software and Patents in Europe
- Software distributors paying Microsoft patent tax
- Software does not make a computer a new machine
- Software innovation also happens without patents
- Software innovation happens without patents
- Software is different
- Software is math
- Software is too abstract
- Software is too abstract, patent quality is bad
- Software is too abstract, software patent quality is terrible
- Software patent
- Software patent quality is terrible
- Software patent quality worse than all other fields
- Software patents
- Software patents are abstract and ambiguous
- Software patents are legal uncertainty
- Software patents are unreadable
- Software patents exist in Europe, kinda
- Software patents exist in Europe, mostly
- Software patents harm SMEs
- Software patents in the financial sector
- Software patents produce legal uncertainty
- Software patents stiffle innovation
- Software patents stifle innovation
- Software patents wiki: home page
- Software progress happens without patents
- Software relies on incremental development
- Solidarity among campaigns against software patents
- Solutions to technical problems
- Some SMEs like software patents myth
- Sonia Sotomayor (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Sony
- Sources of software patent news
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Spain
- Specialised patent court
- Specialised patent courts
- Speculation
- Stac v. Microsoft
- Stac v. Microsoft (1993, USA)
- Staff Union of the EPO
- Stalmarck's algorithm
- Standard
- Standards
- Standing
- State Street
- State Street ruling by US CAFC on 23 July 1998
- State Street v. Signature Financial Group
- State Street v. Signature Financial Group (1999, USA)
- State Street v. Signature Group (1999, USA)
- State of the art
- Statements and quotes
- Statements from BEUC
- Statements from CEA-PME
- Statements from CEAPME
- Statements from UEAPME
- Statements from developers
- Statements from managers and analysts
- Statements from venture capitalists
- Statistics, categorising, and counting patents
- Statistics and categorising patents
- Steensgaard's algorithm
- Stephen Breyer (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Storyline and fashion patents
- Storyline patent
- Storyline patents
- Studies
- Studies on economics and innovation
- Study
- Style guide
- Stålmarck's algorithm
- Subject matter
- Submarine patent
- Suggestions for interviewees
- Suggestions for the USPTO in 2013
- Suing makers of unfounded accusations
- Sun
- Sun Microsystems
- Sun Microsystems inc.
- Suomi
- Supporting partial solutions
- Supreme Court of the USA
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Svenska
- Sweden
- Swedish
- Switzerland
- Symantec
- Symantec Corporation
- Symbian ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 8 October 2008
- Symbian v. Comptroller General (2008, UK)
- TLS-authz
- TPP
- TPPA
- TRIPS
- TRIPS Agreement
- Tandberg Telecom AS
- Technical solutions, not technical problems
- Technical solutions not technical problems
- Technology
- Tempalate:dud
- Terminology recommendations
- Texts about software and patents
- The Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal - 2006
- The Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court - 2010
- The EuroLinux petition
- The Exalead ruling by French TGI Paris - 2010
- The Gemstar ruling by UK High Court - 2009
- The Halliburton rulings by UK High Court - 2005-2011
- The Halliburton rulings by UK High Court - 2006-2011
- The Karmarkar Patent and Software - Is Math Patentable?
- The Netherlands
- The Patent Reform Act
- The Patent Reform Act (USA)
- The Patented Webshop
- The SAS Institute ruling by EU Court of Justice - 2011
- The Symbian rulings by UK Court of Appeal - 2007-2008
- The bigger picture
- The disclosure is useless
- The failing solutions are expensive
- The notice problem
- The one-click shopping patent
- The value of promises and estoppel defences
- The whole patent system should be abolished
- The win-win patent myth
- Theora
- Threats in Europe
- Threats in Latin America
- Threats in New Zealand
- TiVo
- Tim Berners Lee
- Tim Berners Lee on software patents
- Tim Bray on software patents
- Timeline
- Timespans
- Timothy B. Lee
- Timothy B. Lee on software patents
- Tivo
- Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
- Trans-pacific partnership
- Trans pacific partnership
- Trans pacific partnership agreement
- Trend Micro v. Barracuda, Fortinet (2008, USA)
- Trend Micro v. Barracuda (2008, USA)
- Trend Micro vs Barracuda, 2008
- Trolls
- Trolls are not the biggest problem
- Twitter and patents
- U.S.
- U.S. Ethernet Innovations
- U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many (2009, USA)
- U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many defendants (2009, USA)
- UEAPME
- UK
- UKIPO
- UK Comptroller General
- UK Intellectual Property Office
- UK Patents Act
- UK anti-swpat letter brainstorming 2010
- UK case law
- UK patent courts and appeals
- UK patent office
- UPLS
- US
- US2886976
- US3182517
- US4050426
- US7035281
- US7490593
- USA
- USA patent courts and appeals
- USA patents courts and appeals
- USITC
- USPTO
- USPTO 2010 consultation
- USPTO 2010 consultation - deadline 27 sept
- US CAFC
- US CAFC Cybersource v. Retail 16 Aug 2011
- US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- US Ethernet Innovations
- US FTC 2003 report on innovation
- US FTC 2011: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition
- US FTC report on innovation
- US GAO 2013 report on patent litigation
- US ITC
- US International Trade Commission
- US PTO
- US Patent Office
- US Supreme Court
- US government
- US government 2011 innovation survey
- US legislation
- Ugg Boots And Amazon
- Unbelievable software patents
- Uncertainty
- Unified European patent jurisdiction
- Unified European patent jurisdiction overview
- Unified Patent Court
- Unified Patents
- Unifying Europe's patent systems
- Unifying Europes patent systems
- Unifying international patent systems
- Uniloc
- Uniloc v. Microsoft (2009, USA)
- Uniloc v. Red Hat and Rackspace (2013, USA)
- Uniloc vs Microsoft, 2009
- Unitary Patent
- Unitary patent
- Unitary patent - previously called Community Patent
- Unitary patents
- United Kingdom
- United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office
- United Patent Litigation System
- United States
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- United States International Trade Commission
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- United States Supreme Court
- United States of America
- Uruguay
- Use software and functionality from 20 years ago
- Use software from 20 years ago
- Used for sabotage rather than competition
- Using software from 20 years ago