ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "South Africa"

m (Undo revision 8062 by 123.125.156.131 (Talk))
(Patent office decisions: Their standard patents are thus similar to the Utility models and innovation patents available in other countries.)
(33 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox|Country-region-todo}}
+
{{navbox}}
In '''South Africa''', software patents are criticised by politicians, granted by the patent office,<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9622.html</ref> but have never been examined by a court.<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>
+
In '''South Africa''', [[software patents]] are criticised by politicians, granted by the patent office,<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9622.html</ref> but have never been examined by a court.<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>
  
 
==Criticism from Minister==
 
==Criticism from Minister==
In 2008, the Minister for Public Service and Administration, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, described software patents as<ref>http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=2304</ref>:
+
In 2008, the Minister for Public Service and Administration, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, described software patents as an<ref>http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=2304</ref>:
  
:''issue which pose a considerable threat the growth of the African software sector” and how there had been “recent pressure by certain multinational corporations to file software patents in our national and regional patent offices. Whereas free software and open standards are intended to be open and encourage competition, patents are exclusive and anti-competitive by their nature.”''
+
<blockquote>
 +
issue which pose a considerable threat the growth of the African software sector” and how there had been “recent pressure by certain multinational corporations to file software patents in our national and regional patent offices. Whereas free software and open standards are intended to be open and encourage competition, patents are exclusive and anti-competitive by their nature.”<br />
 +
<br />
 +
“Whereas there are some industries where the temporary monopoly granted by a patent may be justified … there’s no reason to believe that society benefits from such monopolies being granted for computer programs [and inventions],”<br />
 +
<br />
 +
The minister said that the “continued growth in the quantity and quality of free software illustrates that such protection is not required to drive innovation in software. Indeed, all of the current so-called developed countries built up their considerable software industries in the absence of software patents. For those same countries to insist on software patents now is simply to place patents as barriers in front of newcomers.<br />
 +
<br />
 +
“African software developers have enough barriers as it is without the introduction of artificial restrictions on what programs they are and aren’t allowed to write,”
 +
</blockquote>
  
:''“Whereas there are some industries where the temporary monopoly granted by a patent may be justified … there’s no reason to believe that society benefits from such monopolies being granted for computer programs [and inventions],”''
+
==Patent office decisions==
  
:''The minister said that the “continued growth in the quantity and quality of free software illustrates that such protection is not required to drive innovation in software. Indeed, all of the current so-called developed countries built up their considerable software industries in the absence of software patents. For those same countries to insist on software patents now is simply to place patents as barriers in front of newcomers.''
+
South Africa has an unusual "non-examination" system regarding the approval of patent applications.<ref>http://www.ftisa.org.za/uploads/9/3/advert_web.pdf</ref><ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>  Their standard patents are thus similar to the [[Utility models and innovation patents]] available in other countries.
  
:''“African software developers have enough barriers as it is without the introduction of artificial restrictions on what programs they are and aren’t allowed to write,”''
+
Microsoft has been granted over 300 patents in South Africa, most of which are for software ideas.<ref>http://patentsearch.cipro.gov.za/patents/patentsearch.aspx - Advanced Search "Applicant/Patentee" for "microsoft" - 620 results, half are duplicates</ref>
 
 
==Patent office practice==
 
 
 
South Africa has an unusual "non-examination" system regarding the approval of patent applications.<ref>http://www.ftisa.org.za/uploads/9/3/advert_web.pdf</ref><ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>
 
 
 
Microsoft have been granted over 300 patents in South Africa, most of which are for software ideas.<ref>http://patentsearch.cipro.gov.za/patents/patentsearch.aspx - Advanced Search "Applicant/Patentee" for "microsoft" - 620 results, half are duplicates</ref>
 
  
 
==Legislation==
 
==Legislation==
Line 41: Line 43:
 
** [http://lists.ftisa.org.za/pipermail/discuss/ ftisa discussion mailing list archives]
 
** [http://lists.ftisa.org.za/pipermail/discuss/ ftisa discussion mailing list archives]
 
* [http://www.pubpat.org/ftisaswptpresentation.htm Presentation by Dan Ravicher, including info about South Africa]
 
* [http://www.pubpat.org/ftisaswptpresentation.htm Presentation by Dan Ravicher, including info about South Africa]
 +
* Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_patent_system South African patent system]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references />
+
{{reflist}}
  
  
{{page footer}}
+
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Countries and regions]]
 
[[Category:Countries and regions]]

Revision as of 09:05, 27 February 2012

In South Africa, software patents are criticised by politicians, granted by the patent office,[1] but have never been examined by a court.[2]

Criticism from Minister

In 2008, the Minister for Public Service and Administration, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, described software patents as an[3]:

issue which pose a considerable threat the growth of the African software sector” and how there had been “recent pressure by certain multinational corporations to file software patents in our national and regional patent offices. Whereas free software and open standards are intended to be open and encourage competition, patents are exclusive and anti-competitive by their nature.”

“Whereas there are some industries where the temporary monopoly granted by a patent may be justified … there’s no reason to believe that society benefits from such monopolies being granted for computer programs [and inventions],”

The minister said that the “continued growth in the quantity and quality of free software illustrates that such protection is not required to drive innovation in software. Indeed, all of the current so-called developed countries built up their considerable software industries in the absence of software patents. For those same countries to insist on software patents now is simply to place patents as barriers in front of newcomers.

“African software developers have enough barriers as it is without the introduction of artificial restrictions on what programs they are and aren’t allowed to write,”

Patent office decisions

South Africa has an unusual "non-examination" system regarding the approval of patent applications.[4][5] Their standard patents are thus similar to the Utility models and innovation patents available in other countries.

Microsoft has been granted over 300 patents in South Africa, most of which are for software ideas.[6]

Legislation

Here's the legislation in South Africa on patentable subject matter, from section 25 of the Patent Act, Act 57 of 1978:[7]

25. Patentable inventions

(1) A patent may, subject to the provisions of this section, be granted for any new invention which involves an inventive step and which is capable of being used or applied in trade and industry or agriculture.
(2) Anything which consists of:
(a) a discovery;
(b) a scientific theory;
(c) a mathematical method;
(d) a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business;
(f) a program for a computer; or
(g) the presentation of information, shall not be an invention for the purposes of this Act.
(3) The provisions of subsection (2) shall prevent, only to the extent to which a patent or an application for a patent relates to that thing as such, anything from being treated as an invention for the purposes of this Act.

External links

References