ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "South Africa"

(Criticism from Minister)
(Patent office decisions: Their standard patents are thus similar to the Utility models and innovation patents available in other countries.)
(18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
In '''South Africa''', [[software patents]] are criticised by politicians, granted by the patent office,<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9622.html</ref> but have never been examined by a court.<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>
 
In '''South Africa''', [[software patents]] are criticised by politicians, granted by the patent office,<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9622.html</ref> but have never been examined by a court.<ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>
  
http://natashathomas.de/forum/index.php?showuser=49473 tramadol medication  袦袩袧袤袢袦  http://www.kyrosity.com/forum/index.php?s=1d86b678573772d1e226ffa09b308ad0&showuser=120460buy fioricet fioricet  袪袣袥袪袤袪袡袣袨  http://bamf.portbb.com/profile.php?id=16574buy fioricet fioricet  袭袺袩袮  http://www.sudandot.net/pb/profile.php?id=85105buy fioricet fioricet online  袩袤袥袤袥袢袧袥  http://www.junhyeokkwak.net/courses/profile.php?id=22592 tramadol drug  袩袶袶袺被袬袩
+
==Criticism from Minister==
 +
In 2008, the Minister for Public Service and Administration, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, described software patents as an<ref>http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=2304</ref>:
  
==Patent office practice==
+
<blockquote>
 +
issue which pose a considerable threat the growth of the African software sector” and how there had been “recent pressure by certain multinational corporations to file software patents in our national and regional patent offices. Whereas free software and open standards are intended to be open and encourage competition, patents are exclusive and anti-competitive by their nature.”<br />
 +
<br />
 +
“Whereas there are some industries where the temporary monopoly granted by a patent may be justified … there’s no reason to believe that society benefits from such monopolies being granted for computer programs [and inventions],”<br />
 +
<br />
 +
The minister said that the “continued growth in the quantity and quality of free software illustrates that such protection is not required to drive innovation in software. Indeed, all of the current so-called developed countries built up their considerable software industries in the absence of software patents. For those same countries to insist on software patents now is simply to place patents as barriers in front of newcomers.<br />
 +
<br />
 +
“African software developers have enough barriers as it is without the introduction of artificial restrictions on what programs they are and aren’t allowed to write,”
 +
</blockquote>
  
South Africa has an unusual "non-examination" system regarding the approval of patent applications.<ref>http://www.ftisa.org.za/uploads/9/3/advert_web.pdf</ref><ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>
+
==Patent office decisions==
  
Microsoft have been granted over 300 patents in South Africa, most of which are for software ideas.<ref>http://patentsearch.cipro.gov.za/patents/patentsearch.aspx - Advanced Search "Applicant/Patentee" for "microsoft" - 620 results, half are duplicates</ref>
+
South Africa has an unusual "non-examination" system regarding the approval of patent applications.<ref>http://www.ftisa.org.za/uploads/9/3/advert_web.pdf</ref><ref>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/Software/9693.html</ref>  Their standard patents are thus similar to the [[Utility models and innovation patents]] available in other countries.
 +
 
 +
Microsoft has been granted over 300 patents in South Africa, most of which are for software ideas.<ref>http://patentsearch.cipro.gov.za/patents/patentsearch.aspx - Advanced Search "Applicant/Patentee" for "microsoft" - 620 results, half are duplicates</ref>
  
 
==Legislation==
 
==Legislation==
Line 35: Line 46:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references />
+
{{reflist}}
  
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Countries and regions]]
 
[[Category:Countries and regions]]

Revision as of 09:05, 27 February 2012

In South Africa, software patents are criticised by politicians, granted by the patent office,[1] but have never been examined by a court.[2]

Criticism from Minister

In 2008, the Minister for Public Service and Administration, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, described software patents as an[3]:

issue which pose a considerable threat the growth of the African software sector” and how there had been “recent pressure by certain multinational corporations to file software patents in our national and regional patent offices. Whereas free software and open standards are intended to be open and encourage competition, patents are exclusive and anti-competitive by their nature.”

“Whereas there are some industries where the temporary monopoly granted by a patent may be justified … there’s no reason to believe that society benefits from such monopolies being granted for computer programs [and inventions],”

The minister said that the “continued growth in the quantity and quality of free software illustrates that such protection is not required to drive innovation in software. Indeed, all of the current so-called developed countries built up their considerable software industries in the absence of software patents. For those same countries to insist on software patents now is simply to place patents as barriers in front of newcomers.

“African software developers have enough barriers as it is without the introduction of artificial restrictions on what programs they are and aren’t allowed to write,”

Patent office decisions

South Africa has an unusual "non-examination" system regarding the approval of patent applications.[4][5] Their standard patents are thus similar to the Utility models and innovation patents available in other countries.

Microsoft has been granted over 300 patents in South Africa, most of which are for software ideas.[6]

Legislation

Here's the legislation in South Africa on patentable subject matter, from section 25 of the Patent Act, Act 57 of 1978:[7]

25. Patentable inventions

(1) A patent may, subject to the provisions of this section, be granted for any new invention which involves an inventive step and which is capable of being used or applied in trade and industry or agriculture.
(2) Anything which consists of:
(a) a discovery;
(b) a scientific theory;
(c) a mathematical method;
(d) a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business;
(f) a program for a computer; or
(g) the presentation of information, shall not be an invention for the purposes of this Act.
(3) The provisions of subsection (2) shall prevent, only to the extent to which a patent or an application for a patent relates to that thing as such, anything from being treated as an invention for the purposes of this Act.

External links

References