ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

m
(Undo revision 37578 by CarleyLundberg (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Did you know that іt is in your complete manage on what at any time size you want your penis to be. Maybe you thought that this was some sort of trіck when you noticed the headline but it is not. Allow me be the first to say that there are numeroսs gimmicks out there and numerous false sօlutions that float about the Internet with 1000's of men buуing in to the quick repair options which are just not true.<br><br>Then уou haνe the penis extendeг. This kind of therapy іs fantastic and will work. Grant it you may Һavе to give it the time it needs to attain thе sіze you want but you will ɦave no grievances in the finish.<br><br>Befοre you can find out, yoս need to know how penis enlargement pills woгk. In simplistic phrases, the ingredients in a great, nicely produced peniѕ enlargement pill gеt to work in the body and direct mսch more blood tо the penis. The more this occurs, the much more the veins in the pеnis accommodatе for the extra blood till the veins adapt and stаy largеr completely. Tɦis is what will make tҺe peniѕ bigger.<br><br>Let's encounter it. Is tҺe size of your penis getting you down? Do you rеally feel іnsecure or even embarrassed when your overall performance in mattress is called for? Here's the simple truth. More than 80% of males out there really feel precisely the exact same wаy considering that their penis size could not measure up. If tɦіs sounds like you fear not. penis male enlɑrgement is real and not some fantasy conjured up bƴ some men's imagination. But before you leap on the bandѡagon and start trying each enlargement gooԀs oսt there study this post and discover how two popular enlargement strategies evaluate up!<br><br>Ever wondeгed why some males are devastatіngly lucky with women? All that self self-confidence that pours out from their body simρly stems from 1 factor. their penis size. Tɦat's a rеality. If you have been reseɑrching peniѕ male enlargement on the Internet don't be conceгned you're far from on your οwn. It's among tҺe toρ 10 queries on Google. What this says is that numeroսs males are worried աіth the size of theiг membеr. The problem is that for each search done ߋn [http://kelliharde.buzznet.com/user/journal/25239688/3-stage-formula-will-make/ review of herbal male enhancement supplements] or penis male enlargement therе are almost as many 'clinically proven' methods offered. How doеs one differentiate one from an additional? How ɗօes 1 know which types are safe and wɦіch ones are harmful?<br><br>The important about these is that they can be beneficial but may finisҺ սp cгeаting damages in some instances. Alsо, tɦere іѕ the problеm that not every guy is going to be able to work with a good implant. Sߋme males may еven rеject these implants due to different typеs of functions. Thіs is a problem that maу end up being ɑs ѡell difficult for anyоne to get into. This іs a critical factor to see when obtaining male enhancement to work.<br><br>Having a little penis might sound amusing to many but for the pеrsоn who is suffеring from thіs problem it is truly disturbing. Naturallʏ males are usually considered to be bodily mɑtch and active. The іssue ߋf little dimension of penis is regarded as to be very disappoіnting 1. Ϝor the person who suffers from this issue it gets to bе extremely embarrassіng to even share his ρroblеm. Ҭhe individual feels alone and frustrated. The ƿroblem of little penis leаvеѕ this kind of a person wіth one largе question how to get bigger penis.Creɑting a huge penis is not something yoս shoսld havе to aspiration ɑbout because when уou use natural enlargement you can flip that aspiration into a reality. I used to lengthy for a largеr manhood as I felt that I experienced trulƴ been dealt an unfair hand by character.<br><br>Well, majorіty of men who have attempteԀ tablets and pumps are not satisfied at all with the results. Instead, they аll endured undesirable siԀe results like scars, blisters, penile ԁeformities, and even permanent impotence. ӏf you don't want to endure the same fate, you might choosе for the Hard Knight metɦod rathеr. Penis phƴsіcal еxеrcise is truly an effіcient method which is frequently overlooked by most men. Specialists recommend doing hand workouts to get the preferred growth within 2 months. Here are ѕome suggestions you can use to get the most out οf it.<br><br>Before yоu detеrmine on the very best male imρrovemеnt option to consider (e.g. from pillѕ to the most outrageous metal cock rings), haѵe you recognized the most basic issues that make for wonderful intеrcourse? Have you contemplated on the virtսe of foгeplay, or the significance of providing yοur companion tickles and sensual massages? Probably not.<br><br>EUR The newest Video сlip Review Sites popрing up each working day are nothing morе than Glorified Infօmerciɑls with one hundred%twenty five Biased Reviews. If you arrive across a video clip review site then please view them carefully and you will notice that each video is more like an infomercial for the product that it talks about. Simple as that. 100% Bіased Information.<br><br>Having erectile dysfսnction, ED, is an eаrly warning symptom of a morе severe sickness that is lurking concealed inside the boԁy. To uncover what is lurking deep inside your physique, if you have ED, yоu need to inquire why you ѡould hаve ED and how you can go abоսt to decrease іt.
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="display:none">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} <!-- some title magic also in Common.css -->
 +
<div style="float: right; clear:right; width: 30%;">{{Infobox|{{news feed}} }}</div><div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; padding: 0.3em 1em 1em 1em;">
 +
  <div style="font-size: larger;">
 +
'''<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>&nbsp;Welcome to the ESP Wiki&nbsp;<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>'''<br />
 +
  </div>
 +
(For ''End Software Patents<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)
 +
__NOTOC__
 +
 
 +
Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.<br />
 +
You're also invited to contribute: all {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} pages are publicly editable.<br />
 +
(What's new? See: [http://en.swpat.org/wiki?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=30&limit=500 Recent Changes])
 +
</div>
 +
'''Getting started:''' [[finding things on en.swpat.org]] • [[Talk:Discuss this wiki|Discuss this wiki]] • [[Why abolish software patents]]
 +
 
 +
'''Don't know where to add something?''' Put it on this list: [[links to be processed]].
 +
 
 +
'''Countries and regions:''' [[Argentina]] •
 +
[[Australia]] •
 +
[[Belgium]] •
 +
[[Brazil]] •
 +
[[Canada]] •
 +
[[Chile]] •
 +
[[China, People's Republic of]] •
 +
[[Costa Rica]] •
 +
[[Cuba]] •
 +
[[Denmark]] •
 +
[[Europe]] •
 +
[[Finland]] •
 +
[[France]] •
 +
[[Germany]] •
 +
[[India]] •
 +
[[Ireland]] •
 +
[[Israel]] •
 +
[[Japan]] •
 +
[[Malaysia]] •
 +
[[Mexico]] •
 +
[[New Zealand]] •
 +
[[Philippines]] •
 +
[[Poland]] •
 +
[[Russia]] •
 +
[[South Africa]] •
 +
[[South Korea]] •
 +
[[Spain]] •
 +
[[Sweden]] •
 +
[[Switzerland]] •
 +
[[USA]] •
 +
[[United Kingdom]] •
 +
[[Uruguay]] •
 +
[[Venezuela]]
 +
<!-- add news.swpat.org stories at en.swpat.org/wiki/Template:News_feed --><!-- Left hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: left; width: 49%;">
 +
==Why abolish software patents==
 +
 
 +
* [[All businesses are targets]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Blocking innovation and research]]
 +
* [[Blocking useful freedoms]]
 +
* [[Blocks competing software, reducing choice]]
 +
* [[Breaks software distribution methods]]
 +
* [[Controlling entire markets]]
 +
* [[Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals]]
 +
* [[Costs of the patent system to governments]]
 +
* [[Examples of use for sabotage]]
 +
* [[Freedom of expression]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
* [[Harms to education]]
 +
* [[Hindering competition, obstructing the free market]]
 +
* [[Incompatible timespans]]
 +
* [[Inequality between small and large patent holders]]
 +
* [[Infringement is unavoidable]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Invalid patents remain unchallenged]]
 +
* [[Jobs and skills]]
 +
* [[Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer]]
 +
* [[Low risk]]
 +
* [[Patent ambush]]
 +
* [[Patent trolls]]
 +
* [[Publishing information is made dangerous]]
 +
* [[Software is math]]
 +
* [[Software is too abstract, patent quality is bad]]
 +
* [[Software patents harm SMEs]] (Small and Medium Enterprises)
 +
* [[Software progress happens without patents]]
 +
* [[Speculation]]
 +
* [[The disclosure is useless]]
 +
* [[The failing solutions are expensive]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Arguments|list of arguments}}
 +
 
 +
==Dispelling myths==
 +
* [[Protecting small inventors myth]]
 +
* [[Some SMEs like software patents myth]]
 +
* [[Patent standards here are higher than the USA]]
 +
* [[The win-win patent myth]]
 +
 
 +
==Partial steps toward our goal==
 +
* [[Interoperability exceptions]]
 +
* [[Invalidate patents based on subject matter]]
 +
 
 +
==Insufficient and failing remedies==
 +
 
 +
The following '''are not solutions'''. None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.
 +
 
 +
[[Insufficient and failing remedies]]:
 +
 
 +
* [[Defensive patent pools]]
 +
* [[Prior art database]] including "defensive publication"
 +
* [[Patent clauses in software licences]]
 +
* [[Community patent review]]
 +
* [[Invalidate the most harmful]]
 +
* [[Raising examination standards]]
 +
* [[Defensive patenting]]
 +
* [[Changing company patent policy]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Competition law defence]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Non-solutions}}
 +
 
 +
==Campaigning notes==
 +
* [[Organising a campaign]]
 +
* [[Formulating arguments]]
 +
* [[Making leaflets]]
 +
* What '''not''' to suggest: [[Insufficient and failing remedies]]
 +
 
 +
==Helping out==
 +
* [[Links to be processed]]
 +
* [[Ideas for info to gather]]
 +
* [[Please help find these documents]]
 +
* [[Talk:Discuss this wiki]]
 +
* There's a [[sandbox]] page for test edits
 +
* [[:Category:En.swpat.org]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific domains==
 +
* [[micro-blogging patents]]
 +
* [[audio-video patents]]
 +
* [[XML patents]]
 +
* [[Webpage and web service patents]]
 +
* [[Image processing patents]]
 +
* [[HTML5 and video patents]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
 
 +
==Unsorted==
 +
* [[Cablegate info on software patents]]
 +
* [[Corruption and bullying]]
 +
* [[Free software]]
 +
* [[Legal wordings]]
 +
* [[List of recordings and transcripts]]
 +
** [[Boston swpat conference 2006 videos]]
 +
* [[Patent lawyer]]
 +
* [[Patent non-aggression pacts]]
 +
* [[Patent promises]]
 +
* [[Patents possibly violated by swpat.org]]
 +
* [[Related Wikipedia articles]]
 +
* [[Should the whole patent system be axed]]?
 +
* [[Sources of software patent news]]
 +
** [[Groklaw]]
 +
** [[IFOSSLR patent articles]]
 +
* [[Specialised patent court]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Timeline]]
 +
* [[Webpages that disappeared]]
 +
* [[Which sectors are for and against]]
 +
* [[Who lobbied for software patents]]
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
 +
 
 +
==Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?==
 +
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] (no)
 +
* [[mp3 audio example]] (yes)
 +
* [[digital camera image processing example]] (yes)
 +
* [[Other analyses of the patentability of specific ideas]]
 +
 
 +
==Context and introductions==
 +
* [[General introduction]]
 +
* [[Analogies]]
 +
* [[Choosing words to use in legal proposals]]
 +
* [[Terminology recommendations]]
 +
* [[Criteria for patentability]] - ''What'' is patentable?
 +
* [[Do software patents exist in my area]]?
 +
* [[Searching for patents]]
 +
* [[Reading case law]]
 +
* [[Invention as a whole]]
 +
* [[Patentable subject matter]]
 +
* [[Software patents]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Patenting software in ROM]]
 +
* [[Glossary]]
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
<!-- Right hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: right; width: 49%;">
 +
 
 +
==Court ruling analyses==
 +
{{court rulings worldwide}}
 +
 
 +
==Patent office decisions==
 +
{{patent office decisions list}}
 +
 
 +
==Organisations==
 +
[[Acacia Research Corporation|Acacia]] •
 +
[[Adobe]] •
 +
[[AIPLA]] •
 +
[[AIPPI]] •
 +
[[Alcatel-Lucent]] •
 +
[[Amazon]] •
 +
[[Apple inc.|Apple]] •
 +
[[April]] •
 +
[[Statements from BEUC|BEUC]] •
 +
[[Blackboard inc.|Blackboard]] •
 +
[[Borland]] •
 +
[[Campaign for Creativity|c4c]] •
 +
[[Canonical Group|Canonical]] •
 +
[[CPTN Holdings LLC|CPTN]] •
 +
[[Statements from CEA-PME|CEA-PME]] •
 +
[[Dell]] •
 +
[[Digitude Innovations]] •
 +
[[Electronic Frontier Foundation|EFF]] •
 +
[[End Software Patents]] •
 +
[[Eolas]] •
 +
[[FFII et al.|FFII]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation|FSF]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation Europe|FSFE]] •
 +
[[Ericsson]] •
 +
[[Google]] •
 +
[[Hewlett-Packard]] •
 +
[[HTC]] •
 +
[[IBM]] •
 +
[[IEEE-USA]] •
 +
[[Intel]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Ventures]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Property Asset Corporation|IPAC]] •
 +
[[League for Programming Freedom|LPF]] •
 +
[[LGE]] •
 +
[[Lodsys]] •
 +
[[MacroSolve]] •
 +
[[Microsoft]] •
 +
[[Motorola]] •
 +
[[MPEG LA]] •
 +
[[Newegg]] •
 +
[[Nokia]] •
 +
[[Novell]] •
 +
[[NTP]] •
 +
[[NZICT]] •
 +
[[Open Invention Network|OIN]] •
 +
[[Opera Software|Opera]] •
 +
[[Oracle]] •
 +
[[Philips]] •
 +
[[Red Hat]] •
 +
[[Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents|Rockstar]] •
 +
[[Samsung]] •
 +
[[SAP]] •
 +
[[SGI and Graphics Properties Holdings Inc.|SGI]] •
 +
[[Siemens]] •
 +
[[Software Freedom Law Center|SFLC]] •
 +
[[Sony]] •
 +
[[Sun Microsystems inc.|Sun]] •
 +
[[Staff Union of the EPO|SUEPO]] •
 +
[[Symantec]] •
 +
[[TiVo]] •
 +
[[Statements from UEAPME|UEAPME]] •
 +
[[Uniloc]] •
 +
[[US government|US govt]] •
 +
[[W3C]] •
 +
[[Webvention LLC|Webvention]] •
 +
[[WIPO]] •
 +
[[Yahoo]] •
 +
[[Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Organisations}}
 +
 
 +
==International agreements==
 +
* [[International agreements]]
 +
* [[TRIPS]]
 +
* [[ACTA]]
 +
** [[ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text]]
 +
* [[Europe|EU or Europe]]:
 +
** [[European Patent Office]]
 +
** [[EU Community Patent]]
 +
** [[European Patent Litigation Agreement]]
 +
** [[EU software patents directive]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific patents and infringement suits==
 +
* [[Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al (2010, USA)|Xerox vs Google and Yahoo, 2010]]
 +
* [[Software Tree vs Red Hat, 2009]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs TomTom, 2008]]
 +
* [[Trend Micro vs Barracuda, 2008]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs AT&T, 2006]]
 +
* [[Uniloc vs Microsoft, 2009]]
 +
* [[Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009]]
 +
* [[Example software patents]]
 +
** [[Amazon]]'s [[The one-click shopping patent|one-click shopping]] and [[Amazon's gift ordering patent|gift ordering]]
 +
** [[Microsoft's FAT patents]]
 +
** [[CSIRO wifi patent]]
 +
** [[Apple Dock]]
 +
** [[VoloMedia's podcasting patent]]
 +
 
 +
==Papers, studies, books==
 +
* [[Books about software and patents]]
 +
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
 +
** [[Gowers Review of Intellectual Property]], Andrew Gowers for HM Treasury UK, December 2006
 +
** [[Rethinking the European ICT agenda]], PriceWaterhouseCoopers, September 2004
 +
** [[Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity]], Deutsche Bank Research, June 2004
 +
** [[An Empirical Look at Software Patents]], Bessen and Hunt, March 2004
 +
** [[US FTC report on innovation]], US Federal Trade Commission, October 2003
 +
** [[Network Competition Through Regulation report]], German Monopoly Commission, 2002
 +
* [[The EuroLinux petition]]
 +
* Studies by concerned parties:
 +
** [[2008 State of Software Patents]]
 +
 
 +
==Statements==
 +
* [[Statements and quotes]]
 +
** [[Statements from venture capitalists]]
 +
** [[Statements from developers]]
 +
** [[Statements from BEUC]]
 +
** [[Statements from CEAPME]]
 +
** [[Statements from UEAPME]]
 +
 
 +
==People==
 +
{{section-01}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:En.swpat.org]]

Revision as of 11:49, 7 October 2015

* Welcome to the ESP Wiki *

(For End Software Patents' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)


Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.
You're also invited to contribute: all 671 pages are publicly editable.
(What's new? See: Recent Changes)

Getting started: finding things on en.swpat.org • Discuss this wiki • Why abolish software patents

Don't know where to add something? Put it on this list: links to be processed.

Countries and regions: Argentina • Australia • Belgium • Brazil • Canada • Chile • China, People's Republic of • Costa Rica • Cuba • Denmark • Europe • Finland • France • Germany • India • Ireland • Israel • Japan • Malaysia • Mexico • New Zealand • Philippines • Poland • Russia • South Africa • South Korea • Spain • Sweden • Switzerland • USA • United Kingdom • Uruguay • Venezuela

Why abolish software patents

See also: Category:Arguments and list of arguments

Dispelling myths

Partial steps toward our goal

Insufficient and failing remedies

The following are not solutions. None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.

Insufficient and failing remedies:

See also: Category:Non-solutions

Campaigning notes

Helping out

Specific domains

Unsorted

Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?

Context and introductions

Court ruling analyses

Ordered per region, then newest first. (Also: Cat:Court rulings)

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

EUCJ:

France:

Germany: (overview) (category)

Japan:

Israel: (overview)

Netherlands:

UK: (overview) (category)

USA: (overview) (category)

Patent office decisions

Ordered per patent office, then newest first.

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

European Patent Office: (overview)

France: (overview)

India: (overview)

Israel: (overview)

Japan: (overview)

New Zealand: (overview)

South Africa: (overview)

UK: (overview)

USA: (overview)

Organisations

Acacia • Adobe • AIPLA • AIPPI • Alcatel-Lucent • Amazon • Apple • April • BEUC • Blackboard • Borland • c4c • Canonical • CPTN • CEA-PME • Dell • Digitude Innovations • EFF • End Software Patents • Eolas • FFII • FSF • FSFE • Ericsson • Google • Hewlett-Packard • HTC • IBM • IEEE-USA • Intel • Intellectual Ventures • IPAC • LPF • LGE • Lodsys • MacroSolve • Microsoft • Motorola • MPEG LA • Newegg • Nokia • Novell • NTP • NZICT • OIN • Opera • Oracle • Philips • Red Hat • Rockstar • Samsung • SAP • SGI • Siemens • SFLC • Sony • Sun • SUEPO • Symantec • TiVo • UEAPME • Uniloc • US govt • W3C • Webvention • WIPO • Yahoo • Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎

See also: Category:Organisations

International agreements

Specific patents and infringement suits

Papers, studies, books

Statements

People

Michel Barnier • Tim Berners Lee • James Bessen • Dan Bricklin • John Carmack • Brad Feld • Bill Gates • Andy Grove • Erik Josefsson • Elena Kagan • Brian Kahin • David A. Kennedy • Ben Klemens • Donald Knuth • Bradley Kuhn • Timothy B. Lee • Philip Leith • David Martin • Florian Mueller • Michael Meurer • Eben Moglen • Ciarán O'Riordan • François Pellegrini • Bruce Perens • Simon Phipps • Richard Posner • Dan Ravicher • Giles Sutherland Rich • Pamela Samuelson • Richard Stallman • Ben Sturmfels • Linus Torvalds • Eric Von Hippel • Mark Webbink • David A. Wheeler


Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=37579"