ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
m (Reverted edits by 172.56.17.147 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Growing old pores and skin is not really welcomed by any, and with ladies the issue gets dreadful. So rather than opting for surgeries, why really don't you are trying out Daily life Cell Anti Getting old [http://www.bbc.com/news/ product]. That is all pure and clinically authorized formulation that can help the skin from beneath and therefore you have a refreshed and youthful wanting skin.
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="display:none">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} <!-- some title magic also in Common.css -->
 +
<div style="float: right; clear:right; width: 30%;">{{Infobox|{{news feed}} }}</div><div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; padding: 0.3em 1em 1em 1em;">
 +
  <div style="font-size: larger;">
 +
'''<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>&nbsp;Welcome to the ESP Wiki&nbsp;<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>'''<br />
 +
  </div>
 +
(For ''End Software Patents<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)
 +
__NOTOC__
  
−
'''What does the Product or service Claims?'''
+
Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.<br />
 +
You're also invited to contribute: all {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} pages are publicly editable.<br />
 +
(What's new?  See: [http://en.swpat.org/wiki?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=30&limit=500 Recent Changes])
 +
</div>
 +
'''Getting started:''' [[finding things on en.swpat.org]] • [[Talk:Discuss this wiki|Discuss this wiki]] • [[Why abolish software patents]]
  
−
The cream claims to revive the upper layer of skin and increase your texture by including radiance.
+
'''Don't know where to add something?''' Put it on this list: [[links to be processed]].
−
Features-
 
  
−
• Fights all odds of ageing
+
'''Countries and regions:''' [[Argentina]] •
−
• Fights wrinkles and dissolve good strains
+
[[Australia]] •
−
• Fights totally free radical problems
+
[[Belgium]] •
−
• Helps the skin revive and keep young with overall maintenance formula
+
[[Brazil]] •
−
• Boosts up collagen and elastin advancement
+
[[Canada]] •
 +
[[Chile]] •
 +
[[China, People's Republic of]] •
 +
[[Costa Rica]] •
 +
[[Cuba]] •
 +
[[Denmark]] •
 +
[[Europe]] •
 +
[[Finland]] •
 +
[[France]] •
 +
[[Germany]] •
 +
[[India]] •
 +
[[Ireland]] •
 +
[[Israel]] •
 +
[[Japan]] •
 +
[[Malaysia]] •
 +
[[Mexico]] •
 +
[[New Zealand]] •
 +
[[Philippines]] •
 +
[[Poland]] •
 +
[[Russia]] •
 +
[[South Africa]] •
 +
[[South Korea]] •
 +
[[Spain]] •
 +
[[Sweden]] •
 +
[[Switzerland]] •
 +
[[USA]] •
 +
[[United Kingdom]] •
 +
[[Uruguay]] •
 +
[[Venezuela]]
 +
<!-- add news.swpat.org stories at en.swpat.org/wiki/Template:News_feed --><!-- Left hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: left; width: 49%;">
 +
==Why abolish software patents==
  
−
'''Ingredients-'''
+
* [[All businesses are targets]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Blocking innovation and research]]
 +
* [[Blocking useful freedoms]]
 +
* [[Blocks competing software, reducing choice]]
 +
* [[Breaks software distribution methods]]
 +
* [[Controlling entire markets]]
 +
* [[Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals]]
 +
* [[Costs of the patent system to governments]]
 +
* [[Examples of use for sabotage]]
 +
* [[Freedom of expression]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
* [[Harms to education]]
 +
* [[Hindering competition, obstructing the free market]]
 +
* [[Incompatible timespans]]
 +
* [[Inequality between small and large patent holders]]
 +
* [[Infringement is unavoidable]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Invalid patents remain unchallenged]]
 +
* [[Jobs and skills]]
 +
* [[Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer]]
 +
* [[Low risk]]
 +
* [[Patent ambush]]
 +
* [[Patent trolls]]
 +
* [[Publishing information is made dangerous]]
 +
* [[Software is math]]
 +
* [[Software is too abstract, patent quality is bad]]
 +
* [[Software patents harm SMEs]] (Small and Medium Enterprises)
 +
* [[Software progress happens without patents]]
 +
* [[Speculation]]
 +
* [[The disclosure is useless]]
 +
* [[The failing solutions are expensive]]
  
−
Acetyl Hexapeptide-3, Ubiquinone, Ascorbic acid, Dithiolane-3-Pentanic Acid and Deanol
+
{{also|:Category:Arguments|list of arguments}}
−
Results- With typical software you could make your skin tender, radiant and flawless
 
−
Testimonials- Of course the testimonials and person feedback can be found about the official web site
 
−
Just before and Following Pictures- Available On the internet
 
−
Rating- 2/5
 
  
−
Exactly where to Buy- Check out the official internet site of Existence Cell to acquire the products
+
==Dispelling myths==
−
Trials Offer- Yes it is possible to avail many special discounts and trial presents
+
* [[Protecting small inventors myth]]
−
Indications of growing older usually are not confined to wrinkles only. These may perhaps also target within the [http://animatedtv.about.com/od/showsaz/tp/top50chrctrs.htm method] of loose pores and [http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/topics/topic_music.html skin], sagginess, pigmentation and so forth. To counter assault all these effects, Derma Best can be utilized as an suitable [http://blogs.rediff.com/danielmartin anti-aging] serum. This can be a established deal with lifting remedy to cut back the getting old indications radically.
+
* [[Some SMEs like software patents myth]]
−
What exactly is claimed?
+
* [[Patent standards here are higher than the USA]]
 +
* [[The win-win patent myth]]
  
−
'''The solution claims to point out some efficient anti aging final results in just 7 times of use.
+
==Partial steps toward our goal==
−
Capabilities:'''
+
* [[Interoperability exceptions]]
 +
* [[Invalidate patents based on subject matter]]
  
−
• Lightening of pores and skin tone
+
==Insufficient and failing remedies==
−
• Restored skin elasticity
 
−
• Tightening of pores and skin pores
 
−
• Enhances the dampness and hydration within the skin
 
−
• Helpful versus high-quality lines and wrinkles
 
  
−
'''Ingredients:'''
+
The following '''are not solutions'''.  None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.
  
−
Seaweed Extract, Macadamia Terifolia, Rice Protein, Squalane Oil and Tocopherols.
+
[[Insufficient and failing remedies]]:
−
Results- That has a typical usage of this anti ageing product, anyone can get back a rejuvenated and youthful skin texture.
+
 
−
Aspect Effects- Constantly follow the steps to work with this serum, usually the final results won’t be as good as [http://www.coloring.ws/cartoons.htm expected] .
+
* [[Defensive patent pools]]
−
Testimonials- You'll be able to discover on the net testimonies and before-after pics as well.
+
* [[Prior art database]] including "defensive publication"
−
Wherever to Buy- Just follow the formal website link of this anti getting older serum and place your buy simply.
+
* [[Patent clauses in software licences]]
 +
* [[Community patent review]]
 +
* [[Invalidate the most harmful]]
 +
* [[Raising examination standards]]
 +
* [[Defensive patenting]]
 +
* [[Changing company patent policy]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Competition law defence]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Non-solutions}}
 +
 
 +
==Campaigning notes==
 +
* [[Organising a campaign]]
 +
* [[Formulating arguments]]
 +
* [[Making leaflets]]
 +
* What '''not''' to suggest: [[Insufficient and failing remedies]]
 +
 
 +
==Helping out==
 +
* [[Links to be processed]]
 +
* [[Ideas for info to gather]]
 +
* [[Please help find these documents]]
 +
* [[Talk:Discuss this wiki]]
 +
* There's a [[sandbox]] page for test edits
 +
* [[:Category:En.swpat.org]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific domains==
 +
* [[micro-blogging patents]]
 +
* [[audio-video patents]]
 +
* [[XML patents]]
 +
* [[Webpage and web service patents]]
 +
* [[Image processing patents]]
 +
* [[HTML5 and video patents]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
 
 +
==Unsorted==
 +
* [[Cablegate info on software patents]]
 +
* [[Corruption and bullying]]
 +
* [[Free software]]
 +
* [[Legal wordings]]
 +
* [[List of recordings and transcripts]]
 +
** [[Boston swpat conference 2006 videos]]
 +
* [[Patent lawyer]]
 +
* [[Patent non-aggression pacts]]
 +
* [[Patent promises]]
 +
* [[Patents possibly violated by swpat.org]]
 +
* [[Related Wikipedia articles]]
 +
* [[Should the whole patent system be axed]]?
 +
* [[Sources of software patent news]]
 +
** [[Groklaw]]
 +
** [[IFOSSLR patent articles]]
 +
* [[Specialised patent court]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Timeline]]
 +
* [[Webpages that disappeared]]
 +
* [[Which sectors are for and against]]
 +
* [[Who lobbied for software patents]]
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
 +
 
 +
==Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?==
 +
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] (no)
 +
* [[mp3 audio example]] (yes)
 +
* [[digital camera image processing example]] (yes)
 +
* [[Other analyses of the patentability of specific ideas]]
 +
 
 +
==Context and introductions==
 +
* [[General introduction]]
 +
* [[Analogies]]
 +
* [[Choosing words to use in legal proposals]]
 +
* [[Terminology recommendations]]
 +
* [[Criteria for patentability]] - ''What'' is patentable?
 +
* [[Do software patents exist in my area]]?
 +
* [[Searching for patents]]
 +
* [[Reading case law]]
 +
* [[Invention as a whole]]
 +
* [[Patentable subject matter]]
 +
* [[Software patents]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Patenting software in ROM]]
 +
* [[Glossary]]
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
<!-- Right hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: right; width: 49%;">
 +
 
 +
==Court ruling analyses==
 +
{{court rulings worldwide}}
 +
 
 +
==Patent office decisions==
 +
{{patent office decisions list}}
 +
 
 +
==Organisations==
 +
[[Acacia Research Corporation|Acacia]] •
 +
[[Adobe]] •
 +
[[AIPLA]] •
 +
[[AIPPI]] •
 +
[[Alcatel-Lucent]] •
 +
[[Amazon]] •
 +
[[Apple inc.|Apple]] •
 +
[[April]] •
 +
[[Statements from BEUC|BEUC]] •
 +
[[Blackboard inc.|Blackboard]] •
 +
[[Borland]] •
 +
[[Campaign for Creativity|c4c]] •
 +
[[Canonical Group|Canonical]] •
 +
[[CPTN Holdings LLC|CPTN]] •
 +
[[Statements from CEA-PME|CEA-PME]] •
 +
[[Dell]] •
 +
[[Digitude Innovations]] •
 +
[[Electronic Frontier Foundation|EFF]] •
 +
[[End Software Patents]] •
 +
[[Eolas]] •
 +
[[FFII et al.|FFII]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation|FSF]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation Europe|FSFE]] •
 +
[[Ericsson]] •
 +
[[Google]] •
 +
[[Hewlett-Packard]] •
 +
[[HTC]] •
 +
[[IBM]] •
 +
[[IEEE-USA]] •
 +
[[Intel]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Ventures]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Property Asset Corporation|IPAC]] •
 +
[[League for Programming Freedom|LPF]] •
 +
[[LGE]] •
 +
[[Lodsys]] •
 +
[[MacroSolve]] •
 +
[[Microsoft]] •
 +
[[Motorola]] •
 +
[[MPEG LA]] •
 +
[[Newegg]] •
 +
[[Nokia]] •
 +
[[Novell]] •
 +
[[NTP]] •
 +
[[NZICT]] •
 +
[[Open Invention Network|OIN]] •
 +
[[Opera Software|Opera]] •
 +
[[Oracle]] •
 +
[[Philips]] •
 +
[[Red Hat]] •
 +
[[Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents|Rockstar]] •
 +
[[Samsung]] •
 +
[[SAP]] •
 +
[[SGI and Graphics Properties Holdings Inc.|SGI]] •
 +
[[Siemens]] •
 +
[[Software Freedom Law Center|SFLC]] •
 +
[[Sony]] •
 +
[[Sun Microsystems inc.|Sun]] •
 +
[[Staff Union of the EPO|SUEPO]] •
 +
[[Symantec]] •
 +
[[TiVo]] •
 +
[[Statements from UEAPME|UEAPME]] •
 +
[[Uniloc]] •
 +
[[US government|US govt]] •
 +
[[W3C]] •
 +
[[Webvention LLC|Webvention]] •
 +
[[WIPO]] •
 +
[[Yahoo]] •
 +
[[Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Organisations}}
 +
 
 +
==International agreements==
 +
* [[International agreements]]
 +
* [[TRIPS]]
 +
* [[ACTA]]
 +
** [[ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text]]
 +
* [[Europe|EU or Europe]]:
 +
** [[European Patent Office]]
 +
** [[EU Community Patent]]
 +
** [[European Patent Litigation Agreement]]
 +
** [[EU software patents directive]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific patents and infringement suits==
 +
* [[Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al (2010, USA)|Xerox vs Google and Yahoo, 2010]]
 +
* [[Software Tree vs Red Hat, 2009]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs TomTom, 2008]]
 +
* [[Trend Micro vs Barracuda, 2008]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs AT&T, 2006]]
 +
* [[Uniloc vs Microsoft, 2009]]
 +
* [[Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009]]
 +
* [[Example software patents]]
 +
** [[Amazon]]'s [[The one-click shopping patent|one-click shopping]] and [[Amazon's gift ordering patent|gift ordering]]
 +
** [[Microsoft's FAT patents]]
 +
** [[CSIRO wifi patent]]
 +
** [[Apple Dock]]
 +
** [[VoloMedia's podcasting patent]]
 +
 
 +
==Papers, studies, books==
 +
* [[Books about software and patents]]
 +
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
 +
** [[Gowers Review of Intellectual Property]], Andrew Gowers for HM Treasury UK, December 2006
 +
** [[Rethinking the European ICT agenda]], PriceWaterhouseCoopers, September 2004
 +
** [[Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity]], Deutsche Bank Research, June 2004
 +
** [[An Empirical Look at Software Patents]], Bessen and Hunt, March 2004
 +
** [[US FTC report on innovation]], US Federal Trade Commission, October 2003
 +
** [[Network Competition Through Regulation report]], German Monopoly Commission, 2002
 +
* [[The EuroLinux petition]]
 +
* Studies by concerned parties:
 +
** [[2008 State of Software Patents]]
 +
 
 +
==Statements==
 +
* [[Statements and quotes]]
 +
** [[Statements from venture capitalists]]
 +
** [[Statements from developers]]
 +
** [[Statements from BEUC]]
 +
** [[Statements from CEAPME]]
 +
** [[Statements from UEAPME]]
 +
 
 +
==People==
 +
{{section-01}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:En.swpat.org]]

Revision as of 11:43, 28 December 2014

* Welcome to the ESP Wiki *

(For End Software Patents' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)


Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.
You're also invited to contribute: all 671 pages are publicly editable.
(What's new? See: Recent Changes)

Getting started: finding things on en.swpat.org • Discuss this wiki • Why abolish software patents

Don't know where to add something? Put it on this list: links to be processed.

Countries and regions: Argentina • Australia • Belgium • Brazil • Canada • Chile • China, People's Republic of • Costa Rica • Cuba • Denmark • Europe • Finland • France • Germany • India • Ireland • Israel • Japan • Malaysia • Mexico • New Zealand • Philippines • Poland • Russia • South Africa • South Korea • Spain • Sweden • Switzerland • USA • United Kingdom • Uruguay • Venezuela

Why abolish software patents

See also: Category:Arguments and list of arguments

Dispelling myths

Partial steps toward our goal

Insufficient and failing remedies

The following are not solutions. None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.

Insufficient and failing remedies:

See also: Category:Non-solutions

Campaigning notes

Helping out

Specific domains

Unsorted

Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?

Context and introductions

Court ruling analyses

Ordered per region, then newest first. (Also: Cat:Court rulings)

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

EUCJ:

France:

Germany: (overview) (category)

Japan:

Israel: (overview)

Netherlands:

UK: (overview) (category)

USA: (overview) (category)

Patent office decisions

Ordered per patent office, then newest first.

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

European Patent Office: (overview)

France: (overview)

India: (overview)

Israel: (overview)

Japan: (overview)

New Zealand: (overview)

South Africa: (overview)

UK: (overview)

USA: (overview)

Organisations

Acacia • Adobe • AIPLA • AIPPI • Alcatel-Lucent • Amazon • Apple • April • BEUC • Blackboard • Borland • c4c • Canonical • CPTN • CEA-PME • Dell • Digitude Innovations • EFF • End Software Patents • Eolas • FFII • FSF • FSFE • Ericsson • Google • Hewlett-Packard • HTC • IBM • IEEE-USA • Intel • Intellectual Ventures • IPAC • LPF • LGE • Lodsys • MacroSolve • Microsoft • Motorola • MPEG LA • Newegg • Nokia • Novell • NTP • NZICT • OIN • Opera • Oracle • Philips • Red Hat • Rockstar • Samsung • SAP • SGI • Siemens • SFLC • Sony • Sun • SUEPO • Symantec • TiVo • UEAPME • Uniloc • US govt • W3C • Webvention • WIPO • Yahoo • Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎

See also: Category:Organisations

International agreements

Specific patents and infringement suits

Papers, studies, books

Statements

People

Michel Barnier • Tim Berners Lee • James Bessen • Dan Bricklin • John Carmack • Brad Feld • Bill Gates • Andy Grove • Erik Josefsson • Elena Kagan • Brian Kahin • David A. Kennedy • Ben Klemens • Donald Knuth • Bradley Kuhn • Timothy B. Lee • Philip Leith • David Martin • Florian Mueller • Michael Meurer • Eben Moglen • Ciarán O'Riordan • François Pellegrini • Bruce Perens • Simon Phipps • Richard Posner • Dan Ravicher • Giles Sutherland Rich • Pamela Samuelson • Richard Stallman • Ben Sturmfels • Linus Torvalds • Eric Von Hippel • Mark Webbink • David A. Wheeler


Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=37361"