ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

(There are some Problems You want To avoid For those who Are For the Fat Reduction Educate)
(→‎Organisations: Newegg •)
(25 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I'm sure you've got acknowledged lots of people who may have wound up failing at looking to drop some body weight so you should being aware that incorrect information could be one of the top results in of this. Though some folks will only fail at their diet simply simply because they continuously cheat and do not hold the willpower to stay to it, other people conclude up failing since they will not be acquiring the effects there searching for. Mostly because of an absence of details is a popular motive folks fall short, we will be taking a glance at many of this info that adult meals and women don't have.
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="display:none">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} <!-- some title magic also in Common.css -->
 +
<div style="float: right; clear:right; width: 30%;">{{Infobox|{{news feed}} }}</div><div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; padding: 0.3em 1em 1em 1em;">
 +
  <div style="font-size: larger;">
 +
'''<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>&nbsp;Welcome to the ESP Wiki&nbsp;<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>'''<br />
 +
  </div>
 +
(For ''End Software Patents<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)
 +
__NOTOC__
  
−
One of many first issues that persons end up performing without having at any time noticing it is actually feeding on greater parts than they assume they are truly consuming. For instance, a part of chicken is three ounces, which means that the dimension of your piece of chicken you require to get feeding on should really be about the similar dimensions being a pack of cards. When numerous consumers go for a chunk of chicken they merely consider a whole chicken breast resuming this is a person part, but this is in actual fact about twice the amount that you ought to be taking in. And naturally for those whop make this error at each food, all through a whole day you'll be eating twice the [http://maxburn-brasil.net quantity] of foods that you simply should to be ingesting.
+
Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.<br />
 +
You're also invited to contribute: all {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} pages are publicly editable.<br />
 +
(What's new?  See: [http://en.swpat.org/wiki?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=30&limit=500 Recent Changes])
 +
</div>
 +
'''Getting started:''' [[finding things on en.swpat.org]] • [[Talk:Discuss this wiki|Discuss this wiki]] • [[Why abolish software patents]]
  
−
When many men and girls ended up expanding up they had been instructed which the required to ensure that they try to eat 3 sq. meals on a daily basis as a way to stay nutritious. Right now having said that, people are advised that eating additional foods on a daily basis with smaller portions will likely be the most effective method to hold your rate of  [http://www.wikipedia.org metabolism] likely to help you drop some weight. When you consume foodstuff your system begins burning energy if you want to digest this food, and whenever your shape usually has food stuff to digest it'll obviously wind up burning up additional energy throughout the day.
+
'''Don't know where to add something?''' Put it on this list: [[links to be processed]].
  
−
One more issue that many individuals imagine is the fact by just next a diet plan method they can provide the ability to drop all the fat they need. But anything you need to grasp is you will need to have work out to be able to become productive with weight reduction as just reducing back with your food stuff will not be  [http://www.thehindu.com heading] to try and do the trick the majority of enough time. You may need to know that your physique is smarter than you think that and when you find yourself providing your system with a lot less foodstuff day after day it is heading to regulate to this new foodstuff intake and stop up storing a lot more excess fat. Supplying your whole body with exercising while lessening your calorie consumption will almost certainly lead to the body to burn calories from the excess fat you've got saved on your own shape with the energy you call for.
+
'''Countries and regions:''' [[Argentina]] •
 +
[[Australia]] •
 +
[[Belgium]] •
 +
[[Brazil]] •
 +
[[Canada]] •
 +
[[Chile]] •
 +
[[China, People's Republic of]] •
 +
[[Costa Rica]] •
 +
[[Cuba]] •
 +
[[Denmark]] •
 +
[[Europe]] •
 +
[[Finland]] •
 +
[[France]] •
 +
[[Germany]] •
 +
[[India]] •
 +
[[Ireland]] •
 +
[[Israel]] •
 +
[[Japan]] •
 +
[[Malaysia]] •
 +
[[Mexico]] •
 +
[[New Zealand]] •
 +
[[Philippines]] •
 +
[[Poland]] •
 +
[[Russia]] •
 +
[[South Africa]] •
 +
[[South Korea]] •
 +
[[Spain]] •
 +
[[Sweden]] •
 +
[[Switzerland]] •
 +
[[USA]] •
 +
[[United Kingdom]] •
 +
[[Uruguay]] •
 +
[[Venezuela]]
 +
<!-- add news.swpat.org stories at en.swpat.org/wiki/Template:News_feed --><!-- Left hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: left; width: 49%;">
 +
==Why abolish software patents==
  
−
In all probability you most likely now have an understanding of that what we pointed out over is going to be extremely important for anyone who actually hopes to obtain excess weight decline objectives without ending up failing at their diet.
+
* [[All businesses are targets]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Blocking innovation and research]]
 +
* [[Blocking useful freedoms]]
 +
* [[Blocks competing software, reducing choice]]
 +
* [[Breaks software distribution methods]]
 +
* [[Controlling entire markets]]
 +
* [[Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals]]
 +
* [[Costs of the patent system to governments]]
 +
* [[Examples of use for sabotage]]
 +
* [[Freedom of expression]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
* [[Harms to education]]
 +
* [[Hindering competition, obstructing the free market]]
 +
* [[Incompatible timespans]]
 +
* [[Inequality between small and large patent holders]]
 +
* [[Infringement is unavoidable]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Invalid patents remain unchallenged]]
 +
* [[Jobs and skills]]
 +
* [[Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer]]
 +
* [[Low risk]]
 +
* [[Patent ambush]]
 +
* [[Patent trolls]]
 +
* [[Publishing information is made dangerous]]
 +
* [[Software is math]]
 +
* [[Software is too abstract, patent quality is bad]]
 +
* [[Software patents harm SMEs]] (Small and Medium Enterprises)
 +
* [[Software progress happens without patents]]
 +
* [[Speculation]]
 +
* [[The disclosure is useless]]
 +
* [[The failing solutions are expensive]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Arguments|list of arguments}}
 +
 
 +
==Dispelling myths==
 +
* [[Protecting small inventors myth]]
 +
* [[Some SMEs like software patents myth]]
 +
* [[Patent standards here are higher than the USA]]
 +
* [[The win-win patent myth]]
 +
 
 +
==Partial steps toward our goal==
 +
* [[Interoperability exceptions]]
 +
* [[Invalidate patents based on subject matter]]
 +
 
 +
==Insufficient and failing remedies==
 +
 
 +
The following '''are not solutions'''.  None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.
 +
 
 +
[[Insufficient and failing remedies]]:
 +
 
 +
* [[Defensive patent pools]]
 +
* [[Prior art database]] including "defensive publication"
 +
* [[Patent clauses in software licences]]
 +
* [[Community patent review]]
 +
* [[Invalidate the most harmful]]
 +
* [[Raising examination standards]]
 +
* [[Defensive patenting]]
 +
* [[Changing company patent policy]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Competition law defence]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Non-solutions}}
 +
 
 +
==Campaigning notes==
 +
* [[Organising a campaign]]
 +
* [[Formulating arguments]]
 +
* [[Making leaflets]]
 +
* What '''not''' to suggest: [[Insufficient and failing remedies]]
 +
 
 +
==Helping out==
 +
* [[Links to be processed]]
 +
* [[Ideas for info to gather]]
 +
* [[Please help find these documents]]
 +
* [[Talk:Discuss this wiki]]
 +
* There's a [[sandbox]] page for test edits
 +
* [[:Category:En.swpat.org]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific domains==
 +
* [[micro-blogging patents]]
 +
* [[audio-video patents]]
 +
* [[XML patents]]
 +
* [[Webpage and web service patents]]
 +
* [[Image processing patents]]
 +
* [[HTML5 and video patents]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
 
 +
==Unsorted==
 +
* [[Cablegate info on software patents]]
 +
* [[Corruption and bullying]]
 +
* [[Free software]]
 +
* [[Legal wordings]]
 +
* [[List of recordings and transcripts]]
 +
** [[Boston swpat conference 2006 videos]]
 +
* [[Patent lawyer]]
 +
* [[Patent non-aggression pacts]]
 +
* [[Patent promises]]
 +
* [[Patents possibly violated by swpat.org]]
 +
* [[Related Wikipedia articles]]
 +
* [[Should the whole patent system be axed]]?
 +
* [[Sources of software patent news]]
 +
** [[Groklaw]]
 +
** [[IFOSSLR patent articles]]
 +
* [[Specialised patent court]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Timeline]]
 +
* [[Webpages that disappeared]]
 +
* [[Which sectors are for and against]]
 +
* [[Who lobbied for software patents]]
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
 +
 
 +
==Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?==
 +
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] (no)
 +
* [[mp3 audio example]] (yes)
 +
* [[digital camera image processing example]] (yes)
 +
* [[Other analyses of the patentability of specific ideas]]
 +
 
 +
==Context and introductions==
 +
* [[General introduction]]
 +
* [[Analogies]]
 +
* [[Choosing words to use in legal proposals]]
 +
* [[Terminology recommendations]]
 +
* [[Criteria for patentability]] - ''What'' is patentable?
 +
* [[Do software patents exist in my area]]?
 +
* [[Searching for patents]]
 +
* [[Reading case law]]
 +
* [[Invention as a whole]]
 +
* [[Patentable subject matter]]
 +
* [[Software patents]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Patenting software in ROM]]
 +
* [[Glossary]]
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
<!-- Right hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: right; width: 49%;">
 +
 
 +
==Court ruling analyses==
 +
{{court rulings worldwide}}
 +
 
 +
==Patent office decisions==
 +
{{patent office decisions list}}
 +
 
 +
==Organisations==
 +
[[Acacia Research Corporation|Acacia]] •
 +
[[Adobe]] •
 +
[[AIPLA]] •
 +
[[AIPPI]] •
 +
[[Alcatel-Lucent]] •
 +
[[Amazon]] •
 +
[[Apple inc.|Apple]] •
 +
[[April]] •
 +
[[Statements from BEUC|BEUC]] •
 +
[[Blackboard inc.|Blackboard]] •
 +
[[Borland]] •
 +
[[Campaign for Creativity|c4c]] •
 +
[[Canonical Group|Canonical]] •
 +
[[CPTN Holdings LLC|CPTN]] •
 +
[[Statements from CEA-PME|CEA-PME]] •
 +
[[Dell]] •
 +
[[Digitude Innovations]] •
 +
[[Electronic Frontier Foundation|EFF]] •
 +
[[End Software Patents]] •
 +
[[Eolas]] •
 +
[[FFII et al.|FFII]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation|FSF]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation Europe|FSFE]] •
 +
[[Ericsson]] •
 +
[[Google]] •
 +
[[Hewlett-Packard]] •
 +
[[HTC]] •
 +
[[IBM]] •
 +
[[IEEE-USA]] •
 +
[[Intel]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Ventures]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Property Asset Corporation|IPAC]] •
 +
[[League for Programming Freedom|LPF]] •
 +
[[LGE]] •
 +
[[Lodsys]] •
 +
[[MacroSolve]] •
 +
[[Microsoft]] •
 +
[[Motorola]] •
 +
[[MPEG LA]] •
 +
[[Newegg]] •
 +
[[Nokia]] •
 +
[[Novell]] •
 +
[[NTP]] •
 +
[[NZICT]] •
 +
[[Open Invention Network|OIN]] •
 +
[[Opera Software|Opera]] •
 +
[[Oracle]] •
 +
[[Philips]] •
 +
[[Red Hat]] •
 +
[[Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents|Rockstar]] •
 +
[[Samsung]] •
 +
[[SAP]] •
 +
[[SGI and Graphics Properties Holdings Inc.|SGI]] •
 +
[[Siemens]] •
 +
[[Software Freedom Law Center|SFLC]] •
 +
[[Sony]] •
 +
[[Sun Microsystems inc.|Sun]] •
 +
[[Staff Union of the EPO|SUEPO]] •
 +
[[Symantec]] •
 +
[[TiVo]] •
 +
[[Statements from UEAPME|UEAPME]] •
 +
[[Uniloc]] •
 +
[[US government|US govt]] •
 +
[[W3C]] •
 +
[[Webvention LLC|Webvention]] •
 +
[[WIPO]] •
 +
[[Yahoo]] •
 +
[[Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Organisations}}
 +
 
 +
==International agreements==
 +
* [[International agreements]]
 +
* [[TRIPS]]
 +
* [[ACTA]]
 +
** [[ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text]]
 +
* [[Europe|EU or Europe]]:
 +
** [[European Patent Office]]
 +
** [[EU Community Patent]]
 +
** [[European Patent Litigation Agreement]]
 +
** [[EU software patents directive]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific patents and infringement suits==
 +
* [[Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al (2010, USA)|Xerox vs Google and Yahoo, 2010]]
 +
* [[Software Tree vs Red Hat, 2009]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs TomTom, 2008]]
 +
* [[Trend Micro vs Barracuda, 2008]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs AT&T, 2006]]
 +
* [[Uniloc vs Microsoft, 2009]]
 +
* [[Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009]]
 +
* [[Example software patents]]
 +
** [[Amazon]]'s [[The one-click shopping patent|one-click shopping]] and [[Amazon's gift ordering patent|gift ordering]]
 +
** [[Microsoft's FAT patents]]
 +
** [[CSIRO wifi patent]]
 +
** [[Apple Dock]]
 +
** [[VoloMedia's podcasting patent]]
 +
 
 +
==Papers, studies, books==
 +
* [[Books about software and patents]]
 +
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
 +
** [[Gowers Review of Intellectual Property]], Andrew Gowers for HM Treasury UK, December 2006
 +
** [[Rethinking the European ICT agenda]], PriceWaterhouseCoopers, September 2004
 +
** [[Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity]], Deutsche Bank Research, June 2004
 +
** [[An Empirical Look at Software Patents]], Bessen and Hunt, March 2004
 +
** [[US FTC report on innovation]], US Federal Trade Commission, October 2003
 +
** [[Network Competition Through Regulation report]], German Monopoly Commission, 2002
 +
* [[The EuroLinux petition]]
 +
* Studies by concerned parties:
 +
** [[2008 State of Software Patents]]
 +
 
 +
==Statements==
 +
* [[Statements and quotes]]
 +
** [[Statements from venture capitalists]]
 +
** [[Statements from developers]]
 +
** [[Statements from BEUC]]
 +
** [[Statements from CEAPME]]
 +
** [[Statements from UEAPME]]
 +
 
 +
==People==
 +
{{section-01}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:En.swpat.org]]

Revision as of 06:59, 4 April 2014

* Welcome to the ESP Wiki *

(For End Software Patents' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)


Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.
You're also invited to contribute: all 671 pages are publicly editable.
(What's new? See: Recent Changes)

Getting started: finding things on en.swpat.org • Discuss this wiki • Why abolish software patents

Don't know where to add something? Put it on this list: links to be processed.

Countries and regions: Argentina • Australia • Belgium • Brazil • Canada • Chile • China, People's Republic of • Costa Rica • Cuba • Denmark • Europe • Finland • France • Germany • India • Ireland • Israel • Japan • Malaysia • Mexico • New Zealand • Philippines • Poland • Russia • South Africa • South Korea • Spain • Sweden • Switzerland • USA • United Kingdom • Uruguay • Venezuela

Why abolish software patents

See also: Category:Arguments and list of arguments

Dispelling myths

Partial steps toward our goal

Insufficient and failing remedies

The following are not solutions. None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.

Insufficient and failing remedies:

See also: Category:Non-solutions

Campaigning notes

Helping out

Specific domains

Unsorted

Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?

Context and introductions

Court ruling analyses

Ordered per region, then newest first. (Also: Cat:Court rulings)

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

EUCJ:

France:

Germany: (overview) (category)

Japan:

Israel: (overview)

Netherlands:

UK: (overview) (category)

USA: (overview) (category)

Patent office decisions

Ordered per patent office, then newest first.

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

European Patent Office: (overview)

France: (overview)

India: (overview)

Israel: (overview)

Japan: (overview)

New Zealand: (overview)

South Africa: (overview)

UK: (overview)

USA: (overview)

Organisations

Acacia • Adobe • AIPLA • AIPPI • Alcatel-Lucent • Amazon • Apple • April • BEUC • Blackboard • Borland • c4c • Canonical • CPTN • CEA-PME • Dell • Digitude Innovations • EFF • End Software Patents • Eolas • FFII • FSF • FSFE • Ericsson • Google • Hewlett-Packard • HTC • IBM • IEEE-USA • Intel • Intellectual Ventures • IPAC • LPF • LGE • Lodsys • MacroSolve • Microsoft • Motorola • MPEG LA • Newegg • Nokia • Novell • NTP • NZICT • OIN • Opera • Oracle • Philips • Red Hat • Rockstar • Samsung • SAP • SGI • Siemens • SFLC • Sony • Sun • SUEPO • Symantec • TiVo • UEAPME • Uniloc • US govt • W3C • Webvention • WIPO • Yahoo • Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎

See also: Category:Organisations

International agreements

Specific patents and infringement suits

Papers, studies, books

Statements

People

Michel Barnier • Tim Berners Lee • James Bessen • Dan Bricklin • John Carmack • Brad Feld • Bill Gates • Andy Grove • Erik Josefsson • Elena Kagan • Brian Kahin • David A. Kennedy • Ben Klemens • Donald Knuth • Bradley Kuhn • Timothy B. Lee • Philip Leith • David Martin • Florian Mueller • Michael Meurer • Eben Moglen • Ciarán O'Riordan • François Pellegrini • Bruce Perens • Simon Phipps • Richard Posner • Dan Ravicher • Giles Sutherland Rich • Pamela Samuelson • Richard Stallman • Ben Sturmfels • Linus Torvalds • Eric Von Hippel • Mark Webbink • David A. Wheeler


Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=35269"