ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

(There are several Problems You will need To prevent If you Are To the Fat Decline Prepare)
(→‎Organisations: Newegg •)
(26 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I'm certain you've acknowledged numerous people that have wound up failing at trying to drop some excess weight and you also ought to generally be knowledgeable that improper info is usually among the leading results in of the. Although some persons will basically fall short at their diet regime simply just given that they consistently cheat and do not provide the willpower to stick to it, other folks finish up failing since they usually are not getting the outcome there hunting for. Largely as a consequence of an absence of info is usually a popular reason persons fall short, we will be taking a look at a number of this details that men and girls would not have.
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="display:none">{{FULLPAGENAME}}</span>}} <!-- some title magic also in Common.css -->
 +
<div style="float: right; clear:right; width: 30%;">{{Infobox|{{news feed}} }}</div><div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; padding: 0.3em 1em 1em 1em;">
 +
  <div style="font-size: larger;">
 +
'''<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>&nbsp;Welcome to the ESP Wiki&nbsp;<span style="color: #bb0000; font-size: larger;">*</span>'''<br />
 +
  </div>
 +
(For ''End Software Patents<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)
 +
__NOTOC__
  
−
One of many 1st things that persons finish up executing devoid of ever acknowledging it is actually feeding on more substantial parts than they assume they are really in fact consuming. As an <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/">illustration</a>
+
Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.<br />
−
, a portion of chicken is 3 ounces, which means that the measurement with the piece of chicken you may need to get consuming should really be with regards to the identical measurement as being a pack of cards. When a lot of men and women go for a chunk of chicken they just choose an entire chicken breast presuming this is one particular portion, but this really is in actual fact about two times the amount that you ought to be feeding on. And naturally when you make this error at every single food, during an entire day you might be feeding on 2 times the quantity of food items that you just ought to be taking in.
+
You're also invited to contribute: all {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} pages are publicly editable.<br />
 +
(What's new?  See: [http://en.swpat.org/wiki?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=30&limit=500 Recent Changes])
 +
</div>
 +
'''Getting started:''' [[finding things on en.swpat.org]] • [[Talk:Discuss this wiki|Discuss this wiki]] • [[Why abolish software patents]]
  
−
When numerous fellas and women have been growing up they were advised which the needed to make certain that they take in several sq. meals daily to be able to stay <a href="http://maxburn-brasil.net">nutritious</a>. Right now nonetheless, consumers are advised that eating extra foods each day with scaled-down parts is going to be the most effective solution to retain your metabolism planning to help you drop some excess weight. If you consume food stuff your entire body starts burning calories to be able to digest this food stuff, and once your human body normally has food items to digest it will clearly end up burning up extra calories during the day.
+
'''Don't know where to add something?''' Put it on this list: [[links to be processed]].
  
−
One more point that numerous people assume is by just adhering to a diet plan software they're going to have the capacity to reduce all the weight they need. But anything you want to comprehend is you will need to have physical exercise to be able to become effective with excess weight reduction as just reducing back again on the foods just isn't planning to accomplish the trick the vast majority of time. You'll need to understand that your shape is smarter than you believe and if you are supplying your entire body with considerably less food daily it really is heading to adjust to this new food ingestion and <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">conclusion</a> up storing much more body fat. Providing your body with training though lessening your calorie intake will almost certainly trigger your entire body to melt away calories within the unwanted fat you may have saved with your physique to the electrical power you require.
+
'''Countries and regions:''' [[Argentina]] •
 +
[[Australia]] •
 +
[[Belgium]] •
 +
[[Brazil]] •
 +
[[Canada]] •
 +
[[Chile]] •
 +
[[China, People's Republic of]] •
 +
[[Costa Rica]] •
 +
[[Cuba]] •
 +
[[Denmark]] •
 +
[[Europe]] •
 +
[[Finland]] •
 +
[[France]] •
 +
[[Germany]] •
 +
[[India]] •
 +
[[Ireland]] •
 +
[[Israel]] •
 +
[[Japan]] •
 +
[[Malaysia]] •
 +
[[Mexico]] •
 +
[[New Zealand]] •
 +
[[Philippines]] •
 +
[[Poland]] •
 +
[[Russia]] •
 +
[[South Africa]] •
 +
[[South Korea]] •
 +
[[Spain]] •
 +
[[Sweden]] •
 +
[[Switzerland]] •
 +
[[USA]] •
 +
[[United Kingdom]] •
 +
[[Uruguay]] •
 +
[[Venezuela]]
 +
<!-- add news.swpat.org stories at en.swpat.org/wiki/Template:News_feed --><!-- Left hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: left; width: 49%;">
 +
==Why abolish software patents==
  
−
In all chance you most likely now have an understanding of that what we pointed out above will probably be very vital for anybody who really hopes to obtain body weight decline objectives devoid of ending up failing at their diet plan.
+
* [[All businesses are targets]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Blocking innovation and research]]
 +
* [[Blocking useful freedoms]]
 +
* [[Blocks competing software, reducing choice]]
 +
* [[Breaks software distribution methods]]
 +
* [[Controlling entire markets]]
 +
* [[Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals]]
 +
* [[Costs of the patent system to governments]]
 +
* [[Examples of use for sabotage]]
 +
* [[Freedom of expression]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
* [[Harms to education]]
 +
* [[Hindering competition, obstructing the free market]]
 +
* [[Incompatible timespans]]
 +
* [[Inequality between small and large patent holders]]
 +
* [[Infringement is unavoidable]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Invalid patents remain unchallenged]]
 +
* [[Jobs and skills]]
 +
* [[Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer]]
 +
* [[Low risk]]
 +
* [[Patent ambush]]
 +
* [[Patent trolls]]
 +
* [[Publishing information is made dangerous]]
 +
* [[Software is math]]
 +
* [[Software is too abstract, patent quality is bad]]
 +
* [[Software patents harm SMEs]] (Small and Medium Enterprises)
 +
* [[Software progress happens without patents]]
 +
* [[Speculation]]
 +
* [[The disclosure is useless]]
 +
* [[The failing solutions are expensive]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Arguments|list of arguments}}
 +
 
 +
==Dispelling myths==
 +
* [[Protecting small inventors myth]]
 +
* [[Some SMEs like software patents myth]]
 +
* [[Patent standards here are higher than the USA]]
 +
* [[The win-win patent myth]]
 +
 
 +
==Partial steps toward our goal==
 +
* [[Interoperability exceptions]]
 +
* [[Invalidate patents based on subject matter]]
 +
 
 +
==Insufficient and failing remedies==
 +
 
 +
The following '''are not solutions'''.  None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.
 +
 
 +
[[Insufficient and failing remedies]]:
 +
 
 +
* [[Defensive patent pools]]
 +
* [[Prior art database]] including "defensive publication"
 +
* [[Patent clauses in software licences]]
 +
* [[Community patent review]]
 +
* [[Invalidate the most harmful]]
 +
* [[Raising examination standards]]
 +
* [[Defensive patenting]]
 +
* [[Changing company patent policy]]
 +
* [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 +
* [[Competition law defence]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Non-solutions}}
 +
 
 +
==Campaigning notes==
 +
* [[Organising a campaign]]
 +
* [[Formulating arguments]]
 +
* [[Making leaflets]]
 +
* What '''not''' to suggest: [[Insufficient and failing remedies]]
 +
 
 +
==Helping out==
 +
* [[Links to be processed]]
 +
* [[Ideas for info to gather]]
 +
* [[Please help find these documents]]
 +
* [[Talk:Discuss this wiki]]
 +
* There's a [[sandbox]] page for test edits
 +
* [[:Category:En.swpat.org]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific domains==
 +
* [[micro-blogging patents]]
 +
* [[audio-video patents]]
 +
* [[XML patents]]
 +
* [[Webpage and web service patents]]
 +
* [[Image processing patents]]
 +
* [[HTML5 and video patents]]
 +
* [[Harm to standards]]
 +
 
 +
==Unsorted==
 +
* [[Cablegate info on software patents]]
 +
* [[Corruption and bullying]]
 +
* [[Free software]]
 +
* [[Legal wordings]]
 +
* [[List of recordings and transcripts]]
 +
** [[Boston swpat conference 2006 videos]]
 +
* [[Patent lawyer]]
 +
* [[Patent non-aggression pacts]]
 +
* [[Patent promises]]
 +
* [[Patents possibly violated by swpat.org]]
 +
* [[Related Wikipedia articles]]
 +
* [[Should the whole patent system be axed]]?
 +
* [[Sources of software patent news]]
 +
** [[Groklaw]]
 +
** [[IFOSSLR patent articles]]
 +
* [[Specialised patent court]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Timeline]]
 +
* [[Webpages that disappeared]]
 +
* [[Which sectors are for and against]]
 +
* [[Who lobbied for software patents]]
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
 +
 
 +
==Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?==
 +
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] (no)
 +
* [[mp3 audio example]] (yes)
 +
* [[digital camera image processing example]] (yes)
 +
* [[Other analyses of the patentability of specific ideas]]
 +
 
 +
==Context and introductions==
 +
* [[General introduction]]
 +
* [[Analogies]]
 +
* [[Choosing words to use in legal proposals]]
 +
* [[Terminology recommendations]]
 +
* [[Criteria for patentability]] - ''What'' is patentable?
 +
* [[Do software patents exist in my area]]?
 +
* [[Searching for patents]]
 +
* [[Reading case law]]
 +
* [[Invention as a whole]]
 +
* [[Patentable subject matter]]
 +
* [[Software patents]]
 +
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]]
 +
* [[Patenting software in ROM]]
 +
* [[Glossary]]
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
<!-- Right hand column -->
 +
<div style="float: right; width: 49%;">
 +
 
 +
==Court ruling analyses==
 +
{{court rulings worldwide}}
 +
 
 +
==Patent office decisions==
 +
{{patent office decisions list}}
 +
 
 +
==Organisations==
 +
[[Acacia Research Corporation|Acacia]] •
 +
[[Adobe]] •
 +
[[AIPLA]] •
 +
[[AIPPI]] •
 +
[[Alcatel-Lucent]] •
 +
[[Amazon]] •
 +
[[Apple inc.|Apple]] •
 +
[[April]] •
 +
[[Statements from BEUC|BEUC]] •
 +
[[Blackboard inc.|Blackboard]] •
 +
[[Borland]] •
 +
[[Campaign for Creativity|c4c]] •
 +
[[Canonical Group|Canonical]] •
 +
[[CPTN Holdings LLC|CPTN]] •
 +
[[Statements from CEA-PME|CEA-PME]] •
 +
[[Dell]] •
 +
[[Digitude Innovations]] •
 +
[[Electronic Frontier Foundation|EFF]] •
 +
[[End Software Patents]] •
 +
[[Eolas]] •
 +
[[FFII et al.|FFII]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation|FSF]] •
 +
[[Free Software Foundation Europe|FSFE]] •
 +
[[Ericsson]] •
 +
[[Google]] •
 +
[[Hewlett-Packard]] •
 +
[[HTC]] •
 +
[[IBM]] •
 +
[[IEEE-USA]] •
 +
[[Intel]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Ventures]] •
 +
[[Intellectual Property Asset Corporation|IPAC]] •
 +
[[League for Programming Freedom|LPF]] •
 +
[[LGE]] •
 +
[[Lodsys]] •
 +
[[MacroSolve]] •
 +
[[Microsoft]] •
 +
[[Motorola]] •
 +
[[MPEG LA]] •
 +
[[Newegg]] •
 +
[[Nokia]] •
 +
[[Novell]] •
 +
[[NTP]] •
 +
[[NZICT]] •
 +
[[Open Invention Network|OIN]] •
 +
[[Opera Software|Opera]] •
 +
[[Oracle]] •
 +
[[Philips]] •
 +
[[Red Hat]] •
 +
[[Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents|Rockstar]] •
 +
[[Samsung]] •
 +
[[SAP]] •
 +
[[SGI and Graphics Properties Holdings Inc.|SGI]] •
 +
[[Siemens]] •
 +
[[Software Freedom Law Center|SFLC]] •
 +
[[Sony]] •
 +
[[Sun Microsystems inc.|Sun]] •
 +
[[Staff Union of the EPO|SUEPO]] •
 +
[[Symantec]] •
 +
[[TiVo]] •
 +
[[Statements from UEAPME|UEAPME]] •
 +
[[Uniloc]] •
 +
[[US government|US govt]] •
 +
[[W3C]] •
 +
[[Webvention LLC|Webvention]] •
 +
[[WIPO]] •
 +
[[Yahoo]] •
 +
[[Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎]]
 +
 
 +
{{also|:Category:Organisations}}
 +
 
 +
==International agreements==
 +
* [[International agreements]]
 +
* [[TRIPS]]
 +
* [[ACTA]]
 +
** [[ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text]]
 +
* [[Europe|EU or Europe]]:
 +
** [[European Patent Office]]
 +
** [[EU Community Patent]]
 +
** [[European Patent Litigation Agreement]]
 +
** [[EU software patents directive]]
 +
 
 +
==Specific patents and infringement suits==
 +
* [[Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al (2010, USA)|Xerox vs Google and Yahoo, 2010]]
 +
* [[Software Tree vs Red Hat, 2009]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs TomTom, 2008]]
 +
* [[Trend Micro vs Barracuda, 2008]]
 +
* [[Microsoft vs AT&T, 2006]]
 +
* [[Uniloc vs Microsoft, 2009]]
 +
* [[Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009]]
 +
* [[Example software patents]]
 +
** [[Amazon]]'s [[The one-click shopping patent|one-click shopping]] and [[Amazon's gift ordering patent|gift ordering]]
 +
** [[Microsoft's FAT patents]]
 +
** [[CSIRO wifi patent]]
 +
** [[Apple Dock]]
 +
** [[VoloMedia's podcasting patent]]
 +
 
 +
==Papers, studies, books==
 +
* [[Books about software and patents]]
 +
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
 +
** [[Gowers Review of Intellectual Property]], Andrew Gowers for HM Treasury UK, December 2006
 +
** [[Rethinking the European ICT agenda]], PriceWaterhouseCoopers, September 2004
 +
** [[Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity]], Deutsche Bank Research, June 2004
 +
** [[An Empirical Look at Software Patents]], Bessen and Hunt, March 2004
 +
** [[US FTC report on innovation]], US Federal Trade Commission, October 2003
 +
** [[Network Competition Through Regulation report]], German Monopoly Commission, 2002
 +
* [[The EuroLinux petition]]
 +
* Studies by concerned parties:
 +
** [[2008 State of Software Patents]]
 +
 
 +
==Statements==
 +
* [[Statements and quotes]]
 +
** [[Statements from venture capitalists]]
 +
** [[Statements from developers]]
 +
** [[Statements from BEUC]]
 +
** [[Statements from CEAPME]]
 +
** [[Statements from UEAPME]]
 +
 
 +
==People==
 +
{{section-01}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:En.swpat.org]]

Revision as of 06:59, 4 April 2014

* Welcome to the ESP Wiki *

(For End Software Patents' campaign site, see http://endsoftpatents.org)


Here you'll find information to assist campaigns against software patents.
You're also invited to contribute: all 671 pages are publicly editable.
(What's new? See: Recent Changes)

Getting started: finding things on en.swpat.org • Discuss this wiki • Why abolish software patents

Don't know where to add something? Put it on this list: links to be processed.

Countries and regions: Argentina • Australia • Belgium • Brazil • Canada • Chile • China, People's Republic of • Costa Rica • Cuba • Denmark • Europe • Finland • France • Germany • India • Ireland • Israel • Japan • Malaysia • Mexico • New Zealand • Philippines • Poland • Russia • South Africa • South Korea • Spain • Sweden • Switzerland • USA • United Kingdom • Uruguay • Venezuela

Why abolish software patents

See also: Category:Arguments and list of arguments

Dispelling myths

Partial steps toward our goal

Insufficient and failing remedies

The following are not solutions. None will solve the problem, many are inefficient wastes of time, and some even make the situation worse.

Insufficient and failing remedies:

See also: Category:Non-solutions

Campaigning notes

Helping out

Specific domains

Unsorted

Do our proposals exclude this from patentability?

Context and introductions

Court ruling analyses

Ordered per region, then newest first. (Also: Cat:Court rulings)

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

EUCJ:

France:

Germany: (overview) (category)

Japan:

Israel: (overview)

Netherlands:

UK: (overview) (category)

USA: (overview) (category)

Patent office decisions

Ordered per patent office, then newest first.

Australia: (overview)

Canada: (overview)

European Patent Office: (overview)

France: (overview)

India: (overview)

Israel: (overview)

Japan: (overview)

New Zealand: (overview)

South Africa: (overview)

UK: (overview)

USA: (overview)

Organisations

Acacia • Adobe • AIPLA • AIPPI • Alcatel-Lucent • Amazon • Apple • April • BEUC • Blackboard • Borland • c4c • Canonical • CPTN • CEA-PME • Dell • Digitude Innovations • EFF • End Software Patents • Eolas • FFII • FSF • FSFE • Ericsson • Google • Hewlett-Packard • HTC • IBM • IEEE-USA • Intel • Intellectual Ventures • IPAC • LPF • LGE • Lodsys • MacroSolve • Microsoft • Motorola • MPEG LA • Newegg • Nokia • Novell • NTP • NZICT • OIN • Opera • Oracle • Philips • Red Hat • Rockstar • Samsung • SAP • SGI • Siemens • SFLC • Sony • Sun • SUEPO • Symantec • TiVo • UEAPME • Uniloc • US govt • W3C • Webvention • WIPO • Yahoo • Xerox and Fuji Xerox‎

See also: Category:Organisations

International agreements

Specific patents and infringement suits

Papers, studies, books

Statements

People

Michel Barnier • Tim Berners Lee • James Bessen • Dan Bricklin • John Carmack • Brad Feld • Bill Gates • Andy Grove • Erik Josefsson • Elena Kagan • Brian Kahin • David A. Kennedy • Ben Klemens • Donald Knuth • Bradley Kuhn • Timothy B. Lee • Philip Leith • David Martin • Florian Mueller • Michael Meurer • Eben Moglen • Ciarán O'Riordan • François Pellegrini • Bruce Perens • Simon Phipps • Richard Posner • Dan Ravicher • Giles Sutherland Rich • Pamela Samuelson • Richard Stallman • Ben Sturmfels • Linus Torvalds • Eric Von Hippel • Mark Webbink • David A. Wheeler


Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=35269"