ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Software patents harm SMEs"
m (remove duplication) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Statements== | ==Statements== | ||
| − | + | * [[Statements from CEA-PME]] | |
| − | * | + | * [[Statements from UEAPME]] |
| − | |||
| − | UEAPME | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Studies== | ==Studies== | ||
| − | |||
* [[Rethinking the European ICT agenda]] "''...most small enterprises are strongly opposed.''" | * [[Rethinking the European ICT agenda]] "''...most small enterprises are strongly opposed.''" | ||
* [[Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity]] "''...SMEs are crucial providers of pathbreaking innovations, but would be most adversely affected by patentability....''" | * [[Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity]] "''...SMEs are crucial providers of pathbreaking innovations, but would be most adversely affected by patentability....''" | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Arguments]] | [[Category:Arguments]] | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 31 May 2009
During the EU lobbying, representatives of small and medium enterprises were against software patents.
SMEs can't afford to get patents.
The patent grant process is too slow. SMEs have to get to profitability quickly to survive.
SMEs can't afford to defend themselves against patent litigation, even if they're sure the patent is invalid.
Statements
Studies
- Rethinking the European ICT agenda "...most small enterprises are strongly opposed."
- Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity "...SMEs are crucial providers of pathbreaking innovations, but would be most adversely affected by patentability...."
