ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Software patent quality worse than all other fields"
m (→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Silly patents) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Software patents are unreadable) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* [[The disclosure is useless]] | * [[The disclosure is useless]] | ||
* [[Silly patents]] | * [[Silly patents]] | ||
+ | * [[Software patents are unreadable]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== |
Revision as of 12:03, 6 February 2010
Quality problems can happen in any category of patents, but the quality of software patents is particularly bad.
Possible reasons
- Abstract algorithms can be described in so many ways
- Jargon and lack of tangible components can make a mundane software idea sound technical
- Professionals working in the patents industry only see the ideas submitted for patenting, and therefore fail to realise that they are not qualitatively different from the ideas that good software engineers come up with every day of the week, most of which are considered too obvious to write up and publish
Examples
- Unbelievable software patents
- FFII's webshop which uses 20 ideas patented in the EU
- Microsoft developer's internal comments about his own patents indecipherable by anyone but a patent attorney
- Some Kodak patents
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Raising standards is not our goal
- The disclosure is useless
- Silly patents
- Software patents are unreadable