ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Software patent quality worse than all other fields"
m (moved Software is too abstract, software patent quality is terrible to Software patent quality is terrible: the other stuff is now at software is too abstract) |
(The main cause is probably that '''software is too abstract''', making and applying examination rules is just too difficult.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Quality problems can happen in any category of patents, but the quality of [[software patents]] is particularly bad. This is probably a fundamental problem that can't be avoided in a domain as abstract as software. | Quality problems can happen in any category of patents, but the quality of [[software patents]] is particularly bad. This is probably a fundamental problem that can't be avoided in a domain as abstract as software. | ||
+ | The main cause is probably that '''[[software is too abstract]]''', making and applying examination rules is just too difficult. | ||
==Possible reasons== | ==Possible reasons== |
Revision as of 10:41, 11 January 2013
Quality problems can happen in any category of patents, but the quality of software patents is particularly bad. This is probably a fundamental problem that can't be avoided in a domain as abstract as software.
The main cause is probably that software is too abstract, making and applying examination rules is just too difficult.
Possible reasons
- Abstract algorithms can be described in so many ways.
- Jargon and lack of tangible components can make a mundane software idea sound technical.
- It's impossible for a patent examiner to judge obviousness. Software developers use so many ideas during their work, only a tiny percent ever get submitted to the patent office or otherwise published.
Examples
- Unbelievable software patents
- FFII's webshop which uses 20 ideas patented in the EU
- Microsoft developer's internal comments about his own patents indecipherable by anyone but a patent attorney
- Some Kodak patents
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Raising standards is not our goal
- Silly patents
- How to read patents
- Why software is different
- Software patents produce legal uncertainty
- The disclosure is useless
- Infringement is unavoidable
External links
- Why are Software Patents so Trivial? other version (possibly identical), by FFII
- Is software too abstract to be patented?, 18 Nov 2010, Rob Tiller (Red Hat)
- Why Software is Abstract, by PolR, 7 Oct 2010, Groklaw
- An Open Response to the USPTO — Physical Aspects of Mathematics, 26 Sep 2010, Groklaw