ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Software is math"

(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis Wikipedia: Church-Turing thesis])
(* Counter view: [http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/12/15/computer-software-is-not-math/ Computer Software is Not Math])
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] - if the physical car invention is patentable, should an in-computer game-simulation be?
 
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] - if the physical car invention is patentable, should an in-computer game-simulation be?
* Book: [[Math You Can't Use]]
+
* [[Books]]:
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis Wikipedia: Church-Turing thesis]
+
** [[Math You Can't Use]]
 +
** [[The Karmarkar Patent and Software - Is Math Patentable?]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* {{lang de}} http://www.users.sbg.ac.at/~jack/legal/swp/tech-turing-lambda.pdf
 
* {{lang de}} http://www.users.sbg.ac.at/~jack/legal/swp/tech-turing-lambda.pdf
 +
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis Wikipedia: Church-Turing thesis]
 +
* Counter view: [http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/12/15/computer-software-is-not-math/ Computer Software is Not Math]
  
  
 
{{page footer}}
 
{{page footer}}
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]

Revision as of 09:54, 16 February 2010

Mathematical formulas are generally recognised as non-patentable because math is not patentable subject matter.

Since the logic (idea) of software can be reduced to a mathematical formula (idea) with Church-Turing Thesis, and because mathematical formulas (idea) are not patentable, patent applications for software ideas should be rejected.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links