ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Software Freedom Law Center"

(External links: [http://faif.us FaiF])
 
Line 29: Line 29:
 
* [http://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2011/debian-patent-policy-faq.html Community Distribution Patent Policy FAQ], in collaboration with Debian
 
* [http://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2011/debian-patent-policy-faq.html Community Distribution Patent Policy FAQ], in collaboration with Debian
  
From SFLC series of audio shows, the following discuss software patents:
+
From [http://faif.us FaiF]/SFLC series of audio shows, the following discuss software patents:
 
* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/?tag=patents All podcasts tagged with "patents"]
 
* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/?tag=patents All podcasts tagged with "patents"]
 
* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/2009/apr/28/0x0C/ Episode 0x0C: Patently False]
 
* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/2009/apr/28/0x0C/ Episode 0x0C: Patently False]
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
[[Category:Organisations]]
+
[[Category: Organisations]]

Latest revision as of 11:10, 21 February 2014

Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) is a free software law firm based in New York, USA.

Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T

In the 2006 case of Microsoft v. AT&T, SFLC filed a brief arguing that software is not patentable subject matter:

Bilski

In 2009, SFLC submitted an amicus brief for the Bilski v. Kappos case, at the Supreme Court, and have since published various resources:

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Articles / guides:

From FaiF/SFLC series of audio shows, the following discuss software patents: