ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Software Freedom Law Center"
m (→External links: * Eben Moglen) |
(→External links: [http://faif.us FaiF]) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | '''Software Freedom Law Center''' ('''SFLC''') is a [[free software]] law firm based in New York, [[USA]]. | + | {{navbox}}'''Software Freedom Law Center''' ('''SFLC''') is a [[free software]] law firm based in New York, [[USA]]. |
==Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T== | ==Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T== | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2006/dec/15/software-patent-brief/ SFLC's press release] | ** [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2006/dec/15/software-patent-brief/ SFLC's press release] | ||
** [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061215131844340 Groklaw coverage] | ** [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061215131844340 Groklaw coverage] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Bilski== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In 2009, SFLC submitted an [[Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs|amicus brief for the Bilski v. Kappos case]], at the [[US Supreme Court|Supreme Court]], and have since published various resources: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/bilski-amicus-brief.html SFLC's amicus brief] | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/bilski-resources.html SFLC's Bilski resources page] | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/events/2009/Moglen_Cardozo/CardozaBilskiSpeech11-2-09.mp3 A speech by Eben Moglen, Nov 2] (and [http://punkcast.com/1676/1676/1676_eben_moglen_bilski_and_beyond.mp4 video]) | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast-media/Software-Freedom-Law-Show_0x18_Re-Bilskis-Briefs.ogg Podcast about the Bilski briefs], with Bradley Kuhn and Aaron Williamson | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
− | * [[Eben Moglen]] | + | * [[Eben Moglen]] - Chairman of the board of Directors |
+ | * [[Dan Ravicher]] | ||
+ | * [[Bradley Kuhn]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
− | * | + | |
− | ** [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/?tag=patents All podcasts tagged with "patents"] | + | * [http://softwarefreedom.org SFLC homepage] |
− | + | ||
− | + | Articles / guides: | |
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/patent-tax.html Windows vs. Linux: The Patent Tax] | ||
+ | * [http://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2011/debian-patent-policy-faq.html Community Distribution Patent Policy FAQ], in collaboration with Debian | ||
+ | |||
+ | From [http://faif.us FaiF]/SFLC series of audio shows, the following discuss software patents: | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/?tag=patents All podcasts tagged with "patents"] | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/2009/apr/28/0x0C/ Episode 0x0C: Patently False] | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/podcast/2009/jul/07/0x11/ Episode 0x11: Patented Languages] about [[Mono]] | ||
+ | * [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/patent-tax.html Windows vs. Linux: The Patent Tax] | ||
− | [[Category:Organisations]] | + | {{footer}} |
+ | [[Category: Organisations]] |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 21 February 2014
Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) is a free software law firm based in New York, USA.
Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T
In the 2006 case of Microsoft v. AT&T, SFLC filed a brief arguing that software is not patentable subject matter:
Bilski
In 2009, SFLC submitted an amicus brief for the Bilski v. Kappos case, at the Supreme Court, and have since published various resources:
- SFLC's amicus brief
- SFLC's Bilski resources page
- A speech by Eben Moglen, Nov 2 (and video)
- Podcast about the Bilski briefs, with Bradley Kuhn and Aaron Williamson
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Eben Moglen - Chairman of the board of Directors
- Dan Ravicher
- Bradley Kuhn
External links
Articles / guides:
- Windows vs. Linux: The Patent Tax
- Community Distribution Patent Policy FAQ, in collaboration with Debian
From FaiF/SFLC series of audio shows, the following discuss software patents: