ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Software Freedom Law Center"
(→Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T) |
m (Reverted edits by 209.172.35.77 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navbox}}'''Software Freedom Law Center''' ('''SFLC''') is a [[free software]] law firm based in New York, [[USA]]. | {{navbox}}'''Software Freedom Law Center''' ('''SFLC''') is a [[free software]] law firm based in New York, [[USA]]. | ||
| − | + | ==Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T== | |
| + | In the 2006 case of [[Microsoft v. AT&T]], SFLC filed a brief arguing that software is not [[patentable subject matter]]: | ||
| + | * http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2006/msvatt.pdf | ||
| + | ** [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2006/dec/15/software-patent-brief/ SFLC's press release] | ||
| + | ** [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061215131844340 Groklaw coverage] | ||
==Bilski== | ==Bilski== | ||
Revision as of 03:17, 20 December 2010
Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) is a free software law firm based in New York, USA.
Amicus brief: Microsoft v. AT&T
In the 2006 case of Microsoft v. AT&T, SFLC filed a brief arguing that software is not patentable subject matter:
Bilski
For the 2009 Bilski v. Kappos case in the Supreme Court, SFLC submitted an amicus brief and have since published various resources:
- SFLC's amicus brief
- SFLC's Bilski resources page
- A speech by Eben Moglen, Nov 2 (and video)
- Podcast about the Bilski briefs, with Bradley Kuhn and Aaron Williamson
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Eben Moglen - Chairman of the board of Directors
- Dan Ravicher
- Bradley Kuhn
External links
From SFLC series of audio shows, the following discuss software patents:
