ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Siemens ruling by German BGH on 22 April 2010"

(The case centred on the patent DE10232674, which was upheld.)
(===Analyses=== * [http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2010/05/german-high-court-declares-all-software.html German high court declares all software potentially patentable], by Florian Mueller * [http:)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
* http://news.swpat.org/2010/05/german-court-ruling-upholding-siemens-patent-as-text/<br />(That page includes links to machine translations)
 
* http://news.swpat.org/2010/05/german-court-ruling-upholding-siemens-patent-as-text/<br />(That page includes links to machine translations)
 
Which [[Florian Mueller]] says is a pretty clear endorsement of software patents:
 
 
* [http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2010/05/german-high-court-declares-all-software.html German high court declares all software potentially patentable]
 
 
* [http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/153-German-Supreme-Court-on-Patents-on-Computer-Implemented-Inventions.html German Supreme Court on Patents on Computer-Implemented Inventions], by Axel Horns, including his English translation of the patented idea
 
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
Line 22: Line 16:
  
 
===Analyses===
 
===Analyses===
DE10232674
+
 
 +
* [http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2010/05/german-high-court-declares-all-software.html German high court declares all software potentially patentable], by [[Florian Mueller]]
 +
* [http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/153-German-Supreme-Court-on-Patents-on-Computer-Implemented-Inventions.html German Supreme Court on Patents on Computer-Implemented Inventions], by Axel Horns, including his English translation of the patented idea
  
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Court cases and litigation]]
 
[[Category:Court cases and litigation]]

Revision as of 11:39, 20 May 2010

In May, a German court published this decision in the case titled Xa ZB 20/08:

The case centred on the patent DE10232674, which was upheld.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Analyses