ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Richard Posner on software patents

Revision as of 14:38, 13 January 2013 by Ciaran (talk | contribs) (Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: ==On software not needing patents== Posner published a few articles in the months after the Apple case, with statements which seem to directly support abolishing s)

Richard Posner is an influential US judge. He became prominent in the patent debate in 2012 when he dismissed a law suit between Apple and Google.

Apple v. Google in 2012

Posner is an appeals court judge but decided to come down to a district court to hear a patent suit which Apple filed against Google's Motorola Mobility division, along with Google's countersuit. The trial was due to start on Monday, 11 June, but Posner released a statement on the Friday beforehand saying that although there may be infringement, no damage had been proven and he had decided to dismiss the case "with prejudice" (thus no further case possible for the same infringement).

On software not needing patents

Posner published a few articles in the months after the Apple case, with statements which seem to directly support abolishing software patents, although he didn't discuss this option:

the need for patent protection in order to provide incentives for innovation varies greatly across industries. (...) Most industries could get along fine without patent protection. (...) I would lay particular stress on the cost of invention. [...in industries where...] the cost of a specific improvement may be small, and when that is true it is difficult to make a case for granting a patent. The improvement will be made anyway, without patent protection, as part of the normal competitive process in markets where patents are unimportant.[1]

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Articles by Posner

  • "Why There Are Too Many Patents in America". http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/07/why-there-are-too-many-patents-in-america/259725/.