Difference between revisions of "Blocking innovation and research"
(→Examples) |
(→Analyses) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navbox}}Software patents block innovation and research. This is in addition to the decades of proof that [[software progress happens without patents]]. | {{navbox}}Software patents block innovation and research. This is in addition to the decades of proof that [[software progress happens without patents]]. | ||
− | = | + | XzC8Io <a href="http://yaogdvtdaypl.com/">yaogdvtdaypl</a>, [url=http://zfzxklaggdir.com/]zfzxklaggdir[/url], [link=http://qxqbyhtjhaee.com/]qxqbyhtjhaee[/link], http://hzeclyumvhuq.com/ |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | " | ||
− | |||
==Studies== | ==Studies== |
Revision as of 14:46, 29 May 2010
Software patents block innovation and research. This is in addition to the decades of proof that software progress happens without patents.
XzC8Io <a href="http://yaogdvtdaypl.com/">yaogdvtdaypl</a>, [url=http://zfzxklaggdir.com/]zfzxklaggdir[/url], [link=http://qxqbyhtjhaee.com/]qxqbyhtjhaee[/link], http://hzeclyumvhuq.com/
Contents
Studies
For a full list, see Studies on economics and innovation. Here we highlight a few:
- An Empirical Look at Software Patents "...We find evidence that software patents substitute for R&D at the firm level; they are associated with lower R&D intensity..."
- The EuroLinux petition - 400,000 signatures against the harm of software patents to innovation and competition
Examples
When explaining why Google were not supporting the patent-free Ogg Theora codec, Chris DiBona repled "here's the challenge: Can theora move forward without infringing on the other video compression patents?".[1]
Most software innovation happens through leap-frogging: company A comes up with an idea, company B replicates it with extra features or improvements, company A improves it further. This process is in the interests of innovation and in the interests of the consumer. It expands the market, and very often both A and B benefit from it. Patenting can only slow this process down, to the detriment of the consumer, the market, and the companies who supply that market.
Very often the first company with an idea doesn't get it quite right, or fails to realise its true potential. Their product fails because they execute it badly or market it badly. Another company then builds on the idea and succeeds where the first company failed. (Example: the Wang object technology patents, acquired by Kodak after Wang failed, versus Sun - HELP: more details necessary!) Should the patent system reward failure?
External links
- How Patent Trolls Are A Tax On Innovation, by venture capitalist Fred Wilson
- Markets Are Better Than Patents in Promoting Intellectual Discovery, Says Caltech-led Team of Economists
- Telling the Truth About Software Patents and Innovation, by Andy Updegrove
- The Most Important Software Innovations, by David Wheeler
- Intellectual Property Regime Stifles Science and Innovation, Nobel Laureates Say
- "Effects of Software Patents on Free/Open Source/User Innovation", slides / video (works with Gnash)
- Do Patents Slow Down Innovation?, by venture capitalist Brad Feld