ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Red Hat

Revision as of 20:07, 16 August 2009 by Ciaran (talk | contribs) (SOAP patent controversy: The main criticism is that their promise is not a licence, it's not irrevocable (so if Red Hat was bought out, it could disappear), and that it only applies to developers)


Bilski submissions

In the 2008 Bilski case, submitted a strongly anti-swpat brief.[1]

SOAP patent controversy

Despite lobbying against software patents, Red Hat has raised some concerns when it began applying for software patents related to SOAP without offering a strong non-aggression promise to the free software community.

The main criticism is that their promise is not a licence, it's not irrevocable (so if Red Hat was bought out, it could disappear), and that it only applies to developers, not users or distributors.

See also

External links