Difference between revisions of "Publishing information is made dangerous"
m (Undo revision 7583 by 217.96.110.64 (Talk)) |
(comment4, http://videosexguides.com/ Apo-Doxy-Tabs, http://dragonslegend.com/ levitra online, http://nonnominus.com/ retin a buy online us, http://compsocure.info/ klonopin, http://ceounlv.org/ generi) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
For example, in 2004, a paper was published on "''Precise detection of memory leaks''".<ref>http://camanis.blogspot.com/2009/08/someone-wants-to-patent-three-year-old.html</ref> In 2007, a patent application was filed at the [[USPTO]] for a follow-on invention.<ref>http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220080294853%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20080294853&RS=DN/20080294853</ref> The 2007 application cited the 2004 paper as being part of the state-of-the-art which is extended by the patent application. The authors of the 2004 paper have no connection to the authors of the 2007 patent application. Ironically, one of the authors of the 2004 paper is a prominent member of anti-swpat group [[FFII]]. | For example, in 2004, a paper was published on "''Precise detection of memory leaks''".<ref>http://camanis.blogspot.com/2009/08/someone-wants-to-patent-three-year-old.html</ref> In 2007, a patent application was filed at the [[USPTO]] for a follow-on invention.<ref>http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220080294853%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20080294853&RS=DN/20080294853</ref> The 2007 application cited the 2004 paper as being part of the state-of-the-art which is extended by the patent application. The authors of the 2004 paper have no connection to the authors of the 2007 patent application. Ironically, one of the authors of the 2004 paper is a prominent member of anti-swpat group [[FFII]]. | ||
| − | + | comment4, http://videosexguides.com/ Apo-Doxy-Tabs, http://dragonslegend.com/ levitra online, http://nonnominus.com/ retin a buy online us, http://compsocure.info/ klonopin, http://ceounlv.org/ generic meridia from mexico, http://gemsarg.com/ order generic ambien, http://reflectlove.com/ generic celebrex, http://ronmccall.net/ crestor, | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 11 January 2010
When companies can patent software ideas, publishing information is made dangerous because it highlights a domain where research is being done and thus where patent litigation might become profitable.
For example, in 2004, a paper was published on "Precise detection of memory leaks".[1] In 2007, a patent application was filed at the USPTO for a follow-on invention.[2] The 2007 application cited the 2004 paper as being part of the state-of-the-art which is extended by the patent application. The authors of the 2004 paper have no connection to the authors of the 2007 patent application. Ironically, one of the authors of the 2004 paper is a prominent member of anti-swpat group FFII.
comment4, http://videosexguides.com/ Apo-Doxy-Tabs, http://dragonslegend.com/ levitra online, http://nonnominus.com/ retin a buy online us, http://compsocure.info/ klonopin, http://ceounlv.org/ generic meridia from mexico, http://gemsarg.com/ order generic ambien, http://reflectlove.com/ generic celebrex, http://ronmccall.net/ crestor,
