ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Poland"
m (→External links: {{translate pl|url=) |
(<blockquote> ''The difference in approach between the EPO and, for example, the Polish patent office is illustrated by the fact that the latter has for months been refusing to grant two patents to app) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox|country-region-todo}} | {{Infobox|country-region-todo}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Courts rejecting software patents?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a question to the [[European Commission], Polish MEP Adam Gierek mentioned: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | ''The difference in approach between the EPO and, for example, the Polish patent office is illustrated by the fact that the latter has for months been refusing to grant two patents to applicants granted patents by the EPO. To date, the Polish courts have upheld these decisions.''<ref>http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do;jsessionid=76D53B60F7F43AD7F911EBBF43D2A9D3.node2?language=EN&pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+P-2006-1625+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN</ref> | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Which patents, and which court decisions are these?) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==MEP questions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | MEP Adam Gierek has asked the following questions: | ||
| + | * [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+P-2006-1625+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN P-1625/06], 11 April 2006 | ||
| + | * [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+P-2006-2329+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN P-2329/06], 23 May 2006 | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| + | |||
* {{translate pl|url=http://www.uprp.pl/|title=Poland's patent office}} | * {{translate pl|url=http://www.uprp.pl/|title=Poland's patent office}} | ||
* http://www.uprp.pl/English/PPOs+databases/ - Poland's patent office | * http://www.uprp.pl/English/PPOs+databases/ - Poland's patent office | ||
| Line 7: | Line 24: | ||
* http://thankpoland.info - to thank Poland for blocking the Council of Ministers' approval of software patents | * http://thankpoland.info - to thank Poland for blocking the Council of Ministers' approval of software patents | ||
* ISOC Poland and [[FFII]] PR: [http://kwiki.ffii.org/Polon0411En Poland Opposes EU Council Software Patent Agreement], Nov 17 2004 | * ISOC Poland and [[FFII]] PR: [http://kwiki.ffii.org/Polon0411En Poland Opposes EU Council Software Patent Agreement], Nov 17 2004 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 09:37, 13 March 2010
country-region-todo
Courts rejecting software patents?
In a question to the [[European Commission], Polish MEP Adam Gierek mentioned:
The difference in approach between the EPO and, for example, the Polish patent office is illustrated by the fact that the latter has for months been refusing to grant two patents to applicants granted patents by the EPO. To date, the Polish courts have upheld these decisions.[1]
(Which patents, and which court decisions are these?)
MEP questions
MEP Adam Gierek has asked the following questions:
External links
- Polish original: Poland's patent office (English translations[?]: Google, bing translator)
- http://www.uprp.pl/English/PPOs+databases/ - Poland's patent office
- FFII on Poland and Software Patents
- http://thankpoland.info - to thank Poland for blocking the Council of Ministers' approval of software patents
- ISOC Poland and FFII PR: Poland Opposes EU Council Software Patent Agreement, Nov 17 2004
