ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Phone patent litigation"

(Lawsuits filed: * Samsung v. Apple (2011, USA))
(Lawsuits filed: one settled)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* [[Apple v. HTC (2010, USA)|Apple v. HTC]], early 2010
 
* [[Apple v. HTC (2010, USA)|Apple v. HTC]], early 2010
 
** (Plus counter suit in May 2010)
 
** (Plus counter suit in May 2010)
* [[Nokia v. Apple (2010, USA)|Nokia v. Apple]], 2010
+
* [[Nokia v. Apple (2010, USA)|Nokia v. Apple]], 2010-2011
 +
** Settled June 2011 with Apple paying a one time amount and ongoing royalties to Nokia.<ref>[http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110614-702424.html Nokia And Apple Settle Patent Litigation], WSJ</ref>
 
* [[Eric Gould Bear v. Apple (2010, USA)|Eric Gould Bear v. Apple]], May 2010
 
* [[Eric Gould Bear v. Apple (2010, USA)|Eric Gould Bear v. Apple]], May 2010
 
* [[Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)|Oracle v. Google]], August 2010
 
* [[Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)|Oracle v. Google]], August 2010

Revision as of 01:55, 3 July 2011

In 2010, there was an explosion of litigation between companies developing third-generation mobile phones.

As well as filing litigation in the courts, many cases were filed with the United States International Trade Commission to block imports and exports. No such blocks have yet been put in place (as of August 2010).

As well as filing a lawsuit, many patent holders also file a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission to ban the import of the product in question.

Why so much litigation?

Some factors are obvious: high-tech phones are a new, growing market.

Another factor might be that this new market mixes together software and hardware companies that haven't dealt with each other directly before. For this reason, the companies involved don't have existing patent non-aggression pacts with each other.

Lawsuits filed

Oldest first:

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Diagrams of all the litigation

References