ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Phone patent litigation"

(Lawsuits filed: * NTP v. RIM (2000, USA), settled in 2006 for US$612.5 million, this case may have inspired later cases)
(Lawsuits filed: (plus counter-suit on 30 Oct 2010))
Line 17: Line 17:
 
* [[Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)|Oracle v. Google]], August 2010
 
* [[Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)|Oracle v. Google]], August 2010
 
* [[Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA)|Microsoft v. Motorola]], October 2010
 
* [[Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA)|Microsoft v. Motorola]], October 2010
* [[Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA)]]<ref>http://mediacenter.motorola.com/Press-Releases/Motorola-Mobility-Sues-Apple-for-Patent-Infringement-344d.aspx</ref>
+
* [[Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA)]] (plus counter-suit on 30 Oct 2010)
 
* No law suit, but HTC pays fees to Microsoft.<ref>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/10/03/ballmer-android-aint-free-microsoft-gets-paid/</ref>
 
* No law suit, but HTC pays fees to Microsoft.<ref>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/10/03/ballmer-android-aint-free-microsoft-gets-paid/</ref>
 
* [[Gemalto v. phone manufacturers (2010, USA)]]
 
* [[Gemalto v. phone manufacturers (2010, USA)]]

Revision as of 19:06, 30 October 2010

In 2010, there was an explosion of litigation between companies developing third-generation mobile phones.

As well as filing litigation in the courts, many cases were filed with the United States International Trade Commission to block imports and exports. No such blocks have yet been put in place (as of August 2010).

As well as filing a lawsuit, many patent holders also file a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission to ban the import of the product in question.

Lawsuits filed

Oldest first:

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Diagrams of all the litigation

References