ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Patentable subject matter"
(→Where is it defined?) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * How other domains are excluded from patentability) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
'''Patentable subject matter''' is the patentability [[criterion]] which defines the ''types'' of innovation that can be patented. The goal of anti-[[software patents|software-patent]] campaigns is to have definitions of patentable subject matter clearly exclude software ideas. | '''Patentable subject matter''' is the patentability [[criterion]] which defines the ''types'' of innovation that can be patented. The goal of anti-[[software patents|software-patent]] campaigns is to have definitions of patentable subject matter clearly exclude software ideas. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For discussion of abolishing software patents in this way, see '''[[Exclude software from patentability]]'''. | ||
In the [[USA]], when the context makes it obvious that patents are the topic, this is sometimes called '''statuary subject matter'''. | In the [[USA]], when the context makes it obvious that patents are the topic, this is sometimes called '''statuary subject matter'''. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
For example, in all or most countries, mathematical formulas are considered not to be patentable subject matter. Therefore, even if a mathematical formula fulfils the other [[criteria]] (it's new, it's original, it's useful), it cannot be patented. This is the basis of the interest in [[software is math]] arguments. | For example, in all or most countries, mathematical formulas are considered not to be patentable subject matter. Therefore, even if a mathematical formula fulfils the other [[criteria]] (it's new, it's original, it's useful), it cannot be patented. This is the basis of the interest in [[software is math]] arguments. | ||
| − | + | ==Where is it defined?== | |
| + | |||
| + | In most of [[Europe]], patentable subject matter is defined by the [[European Patent Convention]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the USA, it's section §101 of [[Legislation in the USA|the legislation]]. | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 19: | ||
* [[Choose your words]] - with suggestions for how to define patentable subject matter | * [[Choose your words]] - with suggestions for how to define patentable subject matter | ||
* [[Criteria for patentability]] | * [[Criteria for patentability]] | ||
| − | * [[ | + | * [[How other domains are excluded from patentability]] |
* [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]] | * [[Technical solutions, not technical problems]] | ||
Revision as of 16:51, 1 September 2013
Patentable subject matter is the patentability criterion which defines the types of innovation that can be patented. The goal of anti-software-patent campaigns is to have definitions of patentable subject matter clearly exclude software ideas.
For discussion of abolishing software patents in this way, see Exclude software from patentability.
In the USA, when the context makes it obvious that patents are the topic, this is sometimes called statuary subject matter.
For example, in all or most countries, mathematical formulas are considered not to be patentable subject matter. Therefore, even if a mathematical formula fulfils the other criteria (it's new, it's original, it's useful), it cannot be patented. This is the basis of the interest in software is math arguments.
Contents
Where is it defined?
In most of Europe, patentable subject matter is defined by the European Patent Convention.
In the USA, it's section §101 of the legislation.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Software is math - math is generally considered non-patentable
- Storyline and fashion patents
- Choose your words - with suggestions for how to define patentable subject matter
- Criteria for patentability
- How other domains are excluded from patentability
- Technical solutions, not technical problems
