en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

November 2014: About Microsoft’s patent licence for .NET core

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Difference between revisions of "Patent Absurdity"

From en.swpat.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(wgnWttqy)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
JWAAff  <a href="http://kmwxgwtgpcbv.com/">kmwxgwtgpcbv</a>, [url=http://pldanrbnchrn.com/]pldanrbnchrn[/url], [link=http://bjnepklnmqlt.com/]bjnepklnmqlt[/link], http://ksfuhqkmbuiu.com/
+
{{navbox}}
 +
:''To help make subtitles in other languages, see [[Patent Absurdity/Subtitles]].''
 +
 
 +
'''Patent Absurdity: how software patents broke the system''' is a half-hour film about [[software patents]], published on the 16<sup>th</sup> of April, 2010.
 +
 
 +
==The issues raised==
 +
 
 +
Roughly in chronological order:
 +
 
 +
* [[Bilski]]
 +
* [[Silly patents]] - many would call Bilski's patent, and others mentioned, trivial or silly
 +
* [[Business method patents]] (Bilski's patent is a business method, not a software idea)
 +
* [[Software is math]] (Ben Klemens explains how a "match making" patent, US6,735,568 is just math)
 +
* [[USA#Legislation]]
 +
* [[US Supreme Court]]
 +
* [[Analogies]] - if symphonies had been patented...
 +
* [[Software progress happens without patents]]
 +
 
 +
==The court cases mentioned==
 +
 
 +
:''(see also: [[Case law in the USA]])''
 +
 
 +
* [[Diamond v. Diehr (1981, USA)]]
 +
* [[Parker v. Flook (1978, USA)]]
 +
* [[Gottschalk v. Benson (1972, USA)]]
 +
* [[In re Alappat (1994, USA)]]
 +
* [[State Street v. Signature Group (1999, USA)]]
 +
* [[In re Bilski (2008, USA)]]
 +
* [[Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA)]]
 +
 
 +
==The cast==
 +
 
 +
* [[James Bessen on software patents|James Bessen]]
 +
* [[Dan Bricklin on software patents|Dan Bricklin]]
 +
* [[Peter Brown on software patents|Peter Brown]]
 +
* [[Mishi Choudhary on software patents|Mishi Choudhary]]
 +
* [[Ben Klemens on software patents|Ben Klemens]]
 +
* [[Timothy B. Lee on software patents|Timothy B. Lee]]
 +
* [[Michael Meurer on software patents|Michael Meurer]]
 +
* [[Eben Moglen on software patents|Eben Moglen]]
 +
* [[Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents|Ciarán O'Riordan]]
 +
* [[Dan Ravicher on software patents|Dan Ravicher]]
 +
* [[Karen Sandler on software patents|Karen Sandler]]
 +
* [[Richard Stallman on software patents|Richard Stallman]]
 +
* [[Rob Tiller on software patents|Rob Tiller]]
 +
* [[Jesse Vincent on software patents|Jesse Vincent]]
 +
* [[Mark Webbink on software patents|Mark Webbink]]
 +
 
 +
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
 
 +
* [[List of recordings and transcripts]]
 +
* [[Boston swpat conference 2006 videos]]
 +
* [[Audio-video patents]]
 +
* [[Ogg Theora]]
 +
* [[Who should see Patent Absurdity]] (in the [[USA]])
 +
* [[Who should see Patent Absurdity in New Zealand]]
 +
 
 +
==External links==
 +
* [http://patentabsurdity.com/ Patent Absurdity home page] from where you can watch or download the film.
 +
* [http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/Patent_Absurdity_Screenings Patent Absurdity Screenings]
 +
* [http://news.swpat.org/2009/11/bilski-hearing-transcript/ The Bilski hearing transcript, as text]
 +
 
 +
===Reviews===
 +
 
 +
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100417000550276 www.groklaw.net]
 +
* [http://lwn.net/Articles/383694/ lwn.net]
 +
* [http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/04/16/2041245/Is-the-Tide-Turning-On-Patents yro.slashdot.org]
 +
* [http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2010/04/monday-miscellany_19.html ipkitten.blogspot.com]
 +
* [http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/patent-absurdity/ www.the-source.com]
 +
* [http://opensource.com/law/10/4/patent-absurdity opensource.com]
 +
* [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/04/patent-absurdity-the-movie.html www.patentlyo.com]
 +
* [http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=2911&blogid=14 Darkness Visible: Making Patent Absurdity Patent], by Glyn Moody
 +
* [http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/free-software-film-slams-absurdity-of-software-patents-6545 www.eweekeurope.co.uk]
 +
* [http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Patent-Absurdity-documentary-available-as-free-download-981029.html www.h-online.com]
 +
* [http://www.opensource.org/node/518 www.opensource.org]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/16/patent-absurdity-is-finally-out/ techrights.org]
 +
* [http://webmink.com/2010/04/16/links-for-2010-04-16/ webmink.com]
 +
* [http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2010/04/patent-absurdity-movie-well-meant-but.html fosspatents.blogspot.com], by [[Florian Mueller]]
 +
* [http://news.swpat.org/2010/04/patent-absurdity/ news.swpat.org]
 +
* [http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/134483/index.html lxer.com]
 +
* [http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/04/on-software-patent-absurdity/ www.0xdeadbeef.com]
 +
* [http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/Patent-Absurdity-The-Case-against-Software-Patents-Comes-to-Film linux-magazine.com], by Bruce Byfield
 +
* {{translate de|title=Dokumentarfilm gegen Softwarepatente|url=http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/15568/dokumentarfilm-gegen-softwarepatente.html}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{footer}}
 +
[[Category:Bilski]]
 +
[[Category:Patent Absurdity]]

Latest revision as of 21:10, 16 June 2012

To help make subtitles in other languages, see Patent Absurdity/Subtitles.

Patent Absurdity: how software patents broke the system is a half-hour film about software patents, published on the 16th of April, 2010.

Contents

[edit] The issues raised

Roughly in chronological order:

[edit] The court cases mentioned

(see also: Case law in the USA)

[edit] The cast

[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org

[edit] External links

[edit] Reviews


This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> endsoftwarepatents.org (Main ESP website) <<
>> endsoftwarepatents.org/news (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)