|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {{navbox}}The '''particular machine or transformation''' test refers to the test described by the 2008 ruling of the [[USA]]'s CAFC in the case [[in re Bilski]].
| + | pfOXfZ <a href="http://yhclpzzycnhj.com/">yhclpzzycnhj</a>, [url=http://upgswztkosiv.com/]upgswztkosiv[/url], [link=http://tbkehixvspvv.com/]tbkehixvspvv[/link], http://dpyidggnvevu.com/ |
− | | |
− | :''A claimed process is surely patent-eligible under § 101 if: (1) it is tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) it transforms a particular article into a different state or thing. See Benson, 409 U.S. at 70 ("Transformation and reduction of an article 'to a different state or thing' is the clue to the patentability of a process claim that does not include particular machines.'' Diehr, 450 U.S. at 192 (quoted in the CAFC's Bilski ruling)
| |
− | | |
− | ==Processes and machines==
| |
− | | |
− | Legislation in the USA allows the USPTO to grant patents for ''"any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof"''.<ref>http://www.law.cornell.edu/patent/35uscs101.html</ref>
| |
− | | |
− | The particular-machine-or-transformation test only applies to "processes". Thus, it seems that if a programmed computer was claimed as a "machine", it wouldn't have to pass the particular-machine-or-transformation test. This issue was discussed, and there was either confusion or disagreement about it at the [[US Supreme Court|Supreme Court]]'s hearing of [[Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA)|Bilski v. Kappos]] in 2009. ([http://news.swpat.org/2009/11/bilski-hearing-transcript/ hearing transcript])
| |
− | | |
− | ==External links==
| |
− | * Wikipedia: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-or-transformation_test Machine-or-transformation test]
| |
− | * http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/07-1130.pdf - the 2008 CAFC Bilsk ruling
| |
− | * [http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/10/16/how-the-machine-or-transformation-test-in-bilski-is-failing/ How The “Machine-Or-Transformation” Test In Bilski Is Failing]
| |
− | | |
− | ===Court rulings based on the test===
| |
− | * http://legalpad.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/12/while-supremes-ponder-bilski-is-still-slayin-at-the-local-level.html
| |
− | | |
− | ==References==
| |
− | <references />
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | {{footer}}
| |
− | [[Category:Bilski]]
| |
Revision as of 00:31, 25 May 2010