Difference between revisions of "Organising a campaign"
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Why abolish software patents - list of arguments) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * [http://news.swpat.org/2010/01/esp-public-lists/ Why we need more *public* discussion lists], '''news.swpat.org''') |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Formulating policy: | Formulating policy: | ||
* [[Why abolish software patents]] - list of arguments | * [[Why abolish software patents]] - list of arguments | ||
| + | * [[Choosing words to use in legal proposals]] | ||
* [[Why focus only on software]] | * [[Why focus only on software]] | ||
* [[Duds and non-solutions]] | * [[Duds and non-solutions]] | ||
| Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
Making materials: | Making materials: | ||
| + | * [[Terminology recommendations]] | ||
* [[Giving good presentations about software patents]] | * [[Giving good presentations about software patents]] | ||
* [[Formulating arguments]] | * [[Formulating arguments]] | ||
| Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
* [[Why SME unions should be involved]] | * [[Why SME unions should be involved]] | ||
| + | ==External links== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://news.swpat.org/2010/01/esp-public-lists/ Why we need more *public* discussion lists], '''news.swpat.org''' | ||
{{footer}} | {{footer}} | ||
[[Category:Campaigning]] | [[Category:Campaigning]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:04, 25 March 2012
Previous and existing campaigns against software patents provide good examples for campaign organising.
Contents
Building a large consortium
1. Broad coalition
There are many categories of organisations that should be against software patents.
- Why SME unions should be involved
- Why consumer organisations should be involved
- Why tech groups should be involved
- Why free software groups should be involved
2. Don't try to be the owner
Most organisations don't like taking orders and don't like other people speaking on their behalf. Taking positions involves risks, so most organisations prefer to keep control of their own position on issues such as software patents.
Creating a relationship is good, and having communication channels is good. Trying to install yourself as an umbrella organisation is usually not very attractive.
Some organisations will even go as far as to refuse communication. Maybe this is because a department wants to take full credit within their organisation for the work done on this topic. Whatever the reason, remember that the important thing is to ensure that this organisation knows why and how to push for anti-swpat laws. You can do this with one-way communication tools such as websites. They can read the website, use all the info, and take all the credit.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
Formulating policy:
- Why abolish software patents - list of arguments
- Choosing words to use in legal proposals
- Why focus only on software
- Duds and non-solutions
- More than innovation
- More than trolls
- Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
Making materials:
- Terminology recommendations
- Giving good presentations about software patents
- Formulating arguments
- Making leaflets
- Presentation slides
Audiences:
- Why tech groups should be involved
- Why free software groups should be involved
- Why consumer organisations should be involved
- Why SME unions should be involved
External links
- Why we need more *public* discussion lists, news.swpat.org
