en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

November 2014: About Microsoft’s patent licence for .NET core

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Editing Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)

From en.swpat.org
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in.

Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 422: Line 422:
 
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20101005114201136 Google Answers Oracle, Counterclaims, and Moves to Dismiss Copyright Infringement Claim], 5 Oct 2010, '''Groklaw'''
 
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20101005114201136 Google Answers Oracle, Counterclaims, and Moves to Dismiss Copyright Infringement Claim], 5 Oct 2010, '''Groklaw'''
  
===Background===
+
It's spooky how cveler some ppl are. Thanks!
 
+
* [http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/ Dalvik: how Google routed around Sun’s IP-based licensing restrictions on Java ME], 12 Nov 2007
+
* [http://sites.google.com/site/io/dalvik-vm-internals Dalvik VM Internals], by '''Dan Bornstein'''
+
* [http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/congratulations_google Suns CEO congratulates Google on Android], 2007, '''Jonathan Schwartz'''
+
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Please note that all contributions to en.swpat.org are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 (see en.swpat.org:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: