ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

New Zealand

Revision as of 23:42, 16 June 2009 by Bevan (talk | contribs) (Adding references to stae 3 of the review)
Info to gather about
countries and regions
  • News articles?
  • Companies harmed
  • Studies showing harm?
  • Legislation
  • Court cases
  • Patents granted
  • About the patent office
  • Politicians against swpat

The proposed Patents Bill 2009

This is a proposed Patents Bill that would modernize the patents system for all types of patents without exception for software patents. This might be an improvement over NZ's current software patent law (though probably isn't) however still leaves software patenting unrestricted in NZ.

At the first reading on 5 May 2009, the party votes were:

  • Supporting: National, Labour, ACT, Progres., United F, totaling 107 votes.
  • Not supporting: Green, Maori, totalling 14 votes.

Now the Commerce Committee of the Parliament is inviting comments till July 2.

Both Labour and Act would need to change their stance to outnumber the rest – and even then it would only be by 1 vote. Labour is unlikely to change since they introduced in on 9 July 2008. To be precise it was Judith Tizard, who also introduced s92 copyright law amendments (remember the Internet Blackout just a few months ago?) that introduced it.

Judging by the first reading it seems this bill is going through sooner or later and that it is both necessary and overdue. The issue is that parliament has barely considered or discussed the implications it has on software (and some other industries too).

Kevin Hague (Green MP) – the only MP to mention software in the first reading – points out that "the 20-year duration of patent coverage may be reasonable for a new mousetrap, but is effectively for ever for a software idea".

This bill is the culmination of a review of the Patents Act 1953, which was started in August 2000.[1] The bill intends to completely replace the old Patents Act. As part of the review, initial submissions from the public were sought in 2002. The Ministry of Economic Development's website hosts a summary of those submissions, including a section on Business Methods and Software.

What To Do?

How To Make A Submission?

According to Making a Submission to a Parliamentary Select Committee the Patents bill page is supposed to specify whether submissions can be made online or not. However it does not appear to specify. Perhaps the Committee Secretariat Email contact link implies that you can?

The Written Law

Section 13 defines what is patentable, and sections 14 and 15 define exclusions.

(The words in bold with serifs are terms that are defined by the bill. The words in bold without serifs are references to other parts of the bill.)

The current version of the bill mentions software only once: "Cabinet has previously agreed to proposals in Stage 1 (August 2001) and the first part of Stage 2 (September 2001). Contentious issues including Māori and other concerns regarding issues such as the patentability of biotechnological inventions, medical treatments, and computer software and business methods, will be dealt with in Stage 3 of the review." However there is no mention of software in the proposed law!

It seems that stage 3 may have handed the responsibility of this part off to a Select Committee: "11. Submitters raised a number of policy issues. Most of the issues raised were of a nature that would be best dealt when the Bill is considered by a Select Committee. These issues included; ... 2. The patentability of computer software and business methods;":

Other Exclusions In The Bill

"The bill excludes some inventions from patent protection, even though they might otherwise meet the requirements for a patent, if there is no benefit to the nation in allowing these inventions to be patented. Methods of treatment of human beings by surgery or therapy, and methods of diagnosis practised on human beings will not be able to be patented under the bill... In line with the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, human beings and biological processes for their generation have been excluded from patent protection." – Hon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON (Attorney-General)

Exclusion By Other Criteria

Hon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON (Attorney-General) also says that under the proposed bill "To be granted a patent ... an invention must be a manner of manufacture, novel, involve an inventive step, and be useful." Which raises the question: is useful & innovative software a manner of manufacture? To be precise: Section 13 requires applications to cover "a manner of manufacture within the meaning of section 6 of the Statute of Monopolies". This term should be looked up, but third-party reports already say that this text does introduce software patents.

Patent office

The Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) is responsible for examining patent applications.

In 2005, they approved an application for using a computer with an XML word-processor document, displayed with an XML Schema Definition, using software with the functionality of "parsing, modifying, reading, and creating the word-processor document".[2] [3]

To search for patents on the NZIPO website, go to their search page:

Then fill in one or more fields and go back to the top of the page and click "Submit query".

See also

External links

Government institutions

Other

References