ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007"

(categories)
Line 1: Line 1:
This case did not touch the important issue of [[patentable subject matter]].
+
This case did not touch the important issue of [[patentable subject matter]] but addressed the issue; if a party violates a US patent through actions taken in another country, can that party be sued in the USA?
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 6: Line 6:
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061215131844340 SFLC's amicus brief]
 
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061215131844340 SFLC's amicus brief]
 +
 +
[[Category:Legal topics]]
 +
[[Category:Case law in the USA]]

Revision as of 09:57, 24 June 2009

This case did not touch the important issue of patentable subject matter but addressed the issue; if a party violates a US patent through actions taken in another country, can that party be sued in the USA?

See also

External links