ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Microsoft FAT patents"
m (→References: {{page footer}}) |
m (Microsoft) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Microsoft has a number of patents on how to deal with filename in their commonly used FAT filesystem. | + | [[Microsoft]] has a number of patents on how to deal with filename in their commonly used FAT filesystem. |
These include: | These include: | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* January 2009: [[Microsoft vs. TomTom, 2008|Microsoft uses it's FAT patents against TomTom]] | * January 2009: [[Microsoft vs. TomTom, 2008|Microsoft uses it's FAT patents against TomTom]] | ||
− | == | + | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== |
* [[Microsoft]] | * [[Microsoft]] | ||
* [[Microsoft vs. TomTom]] - where MS forced TomTom to pay for patents, seemingly including their FAT patents | * [[Microsoft vs. TomTom]] - where MS forced TomTom to pay for patents, seemingly including their FAT patents | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
+ | {{page footer}} | ||
[[Category:Example software patents]] | [[Category:Example software patents]] | ||
[[Category:Microsoft]] | [[Category:Microsoft]] | ||
− |
Revision as of 11:29, 22 January 2010
Microsoft has a number of patents on how to deal with filename in their commonly used FAT filesystem.
These include:
- US5,579,517 "The '517 patent"
- US5,758,352
Timeline
- December 2003: MS starts threatening people[1]
- September 2004: The '517 patent is rejected[2] thanks to the work of PubPat[3] and others.
- January 2006: The '517 patent is reinstated[4]
- January 2009: Microsoft uses it's FAT patents against TomTom
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Microsoft
- Microsoft vs. TomTom - where MS forced TomTom to pay for patents, seemingly including their FAT patents
- Litigation and specific patents
External links
- PubPat: Microsoft FAT Patent (page out of date)
- Groklaw report on A patch to remove VFAT filename conversion from the Linux kernel,
- Microsoft's IP chief on TomTom, Linux and patents, techflash, Feb 2009