ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Microsoft FAT patents"
m (→External links: * [http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/QA_Microsofts_chief_patent_lawyer_on_TomTom_and_Linux_40354407.html Microsoft's IP chief on TomTom, Linux and patents], techflash, Feb 2009) |
m (→See also: * Litigation and specific patents) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* [[Microsoft]] | * [[Microsoft]] | ||
* [[Microsoft vs. TomTom]] - where MS forced TomTom to pay for patents, seemingly including their FAT patents | * [[Microsoft vs. TomTom]] - where MS forced TomTom to pay for patents, seemingly including their FAT patents | ||
| + | * [[Litigation and specific patents]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 16 August 2009
Microsoft has a number of patents on how to deal with filename in their commonly used FAT filesystem.
These include:
- US5,579,517 "The '517 patent"
- US5,758,352
Contents
Timeline
- December 2003: MS starts threatening people[1]
- September 2004: The '517 patent is rejected[2] thanks to the work of PubPat[3] and others.
- January 2006: The '517 patent is reinstated[4]
- January 2009: Microsoft uses it's FAT patents against TomTom
See also
- Microsoft
- Microsoft vs. TomTom - where MS forced TomTom to pay for patents, seemingly including their FAT patents
- Litigation and specific patents
External links
- PubPat: Microsoft FAT Patent (page out of date)
- Groklaw report on A patch to remove VFAT filename conversion from the Linux kernel,
- Microsoft's IP chief on TomTom, Linux and patents, techflash, Feb 2009
