ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Mark Webbink on software patents"

m (Reverted edits by Ezadetedek (talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://ukusypumi.co.cc Under Construction! Please Visit Reserve Page. Page Will Be Available Shortly]=
 
----
 
=[http://ukusypumi.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 
 
{{navbox}}
 
{{navbox}}
 
'''Mark Webbink''' has been involved in campaigns against [[software patents]] and in campaigns to increase patent review efficiency.
 
'''Mark Webbink''' has been involved in campaigns against [[software patents]] and in campaigns to increase patent review efficiency.
Line 16: Line 8:
 
In the final days of the EU software patents directive, there were three possible outcomes: complete win, complete loss, and a middle ground where software would be patentable but there would be an [[interoperability exception]].
 
In the final days of the EU software patents directive, there were three possible outcomes: complete win, complete loss, and a middle ground where software would be patentable but there would be an [[interoperability exception]].
  
While the majority of the anti-swpat campaigns, including [[FFII]], continued to lobby for what would be a complete win, Webbink started lobbying for the middle ground, with representatives of [[IBM]], [[Google]], and [[Sun]].&lt;ref>http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1911&amp;mn=12550&amp;pt=msg&amp;mid=891374&lt;/ref>  When details of this emerged, Webbink was strongly criticised by some parts of the anti-swpat movement.
+
While the majority of the anti-swpat campaigns, including [[FFII]], continued to lobby for what would be a complete win, Webbink started lobbying for the middle ground, with representatives of [[IBM]], [[Google]], and [[Sun]].<ref>http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1911&mn=12550&pt=msg&mid=891374</ref>  When details of this emerged, Webbink was strongly criticised by some parts of the anti-swpat movement.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 24: Line 16:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
&lt;references />
+
<references />
  
  

Latest revision as of 07:45, 24 November 2010

Mark Webbink has been involved in campaigns against software patents and in campaigns to increase patent review efficiency.

During the EU software patents directive, Webbink was the primary lobbyist for Red Hat against software patents. Afterwards, he went on to work for peer-to-patent, a community patent review project.

Accusations of changing sides, 2005

In the final days of the EU software patents directive, there were three possible outcomes: complete win, complete loss, and a middle ground where software would be patentable but there would be an interoperability exception.

While the majority of the anti-swpat campaigns, including FFII, continued to lobby for what would be a complete win, Webbink started lobbying for the middle ground, with representatives of IBM, Google, and Sun.[1] When details of this emerged, Webbink was strongly criticised by some parts of the anti-swpat movement.

External links

References