ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Low risk"

(devil's bargain revisited)
 
(rm ref that doesn't prove the sentence)
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''devil's bargain'''<ref>[http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100107/0517167656.shtml What If The Very Theory That Underlies Why We Need Patents Is Wrong?] Mike Masnick for techdirt.com Apr 15, 2010</ref> can be called a bargain only if it benefits someone besides the devil.  A major justification for the bargain, the encouragement of entry into industries with high [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barriers_to_entry cost of entry], i.e. '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_risk high risk]''', does not apply to software development.<ref>[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1502864 Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation] Carliss Y. Baldwin and Eric A. Von Hippel November 25, 2009</ref>  Software development is exceptionally cheap, thus '''low risk'''.
+
{{navbox}}
 +
Supporters of patents sometimes say that businesses need them in order to have something tangible in return for their initial investment into researching their product idea.  However, in software development, where the necessary initial investment is usually relatively small, and can be zero, this is not credible.  Worse, if companies feel obliged to obtain patents, this obligation then creates a very large cost of entry.
 +
 
 +
The '''devil's bargain'''<ref>[http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100107/0517167656.shtml What If The Very Theory That Underlies Why We Need Patents Is Wrong?] Mike Masnick for techdirt.com Apr 15, 2010</ref> can be called a bargain only if it benefits someone besides the devil.  A major justification for the bargain, the encouragement of entry by new people with new ideas into industries with high [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barriers_to_entry cost of entry], i.e. '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_risk high risk]''', does not apply to software development.<ref>[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1502864 Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation] Carliss Y. Baldwin and Eric A. Von Hippel November 25, 2009</ref>  Software development is exceptionally cheap, thus '''low risk'''.
 +
 
 
# The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_cost cost of equipment] is minuscule compared to other business activities: buy a single personal computer and lease an internet connection and you are ready for action.
 
# The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_cost cost of equipment] is minuscule compared to other business activities: buy a single personal computer and lease an internet connection and you are ready for action.
# The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuition cost of training] is low: the internet overflows with programming learning materials and open source software projects looking for contributors.
+
# The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuition cost of training] is low: the internet overflows with programming learning materials and [[open source software]] projects looking for contributors.
In this regard, software development does not resemble an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry industrial activity] like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining mining] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing manufacturing].  It is an extremely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk-return_spectrum low risk] venture, yet a single programmer can, and frequently does, innovate leaps and bounds beyond the industry state of the art.<ref>[http://git-scm.com git, the fast version control system] original author: Linus Torvalds</ref>
+
 
 +
In this regard, software development does not resemble an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry industrial activity] like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining mining] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing manufacturing].  It is an extremely [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk-return_spectrum low risk] venture, yet a single programmer can, and frequently does, innovate leaps and bounds beyond the industry [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_the_art state of the art].
 +
 
 +
The purpose of the patent system, the devil's bargain, is to promote innovation in high risk industries.  Software development is a low risk industry. [[Software innovation happens without patents]]. In the software realm, the patent system only hinders [[innovation]], because it introduces risk where none existed.  When it comes to software, the devil's bargain is ''no bargain''.  The justification does not apply, thus we should not be surprised that the system fails to induce the intended effect, and in fact induces just the opposite effect: stagnation.
  
The purpose of the patent system, the devil's bargain, is to promote innovation in high risk industries.  Software development is a low risk industry.  [[Software innovation happens without patents]].  In the software realm, the patent system only hinders innovation, because it introduces risk where none existed.  When it comes to software, the devil's bargain is ''no bargain''.  The justification does not apply, thus we should not be surprised that the system fails to induce the intended effect, and in fact induces just the opposite effect: stagnation.
+
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
 
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
 +
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references />
+
{{reflist}}
 +
 
  
{{page footer}}
+
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]

Revision as of 19:58, 15 April 2012

Supporters of patents sometimes say that businesses need them in order to have something tangible in return for their initial investment into researching their product idea. However, in software development, where the necessary initial investment is usually relatively small, and can be zero, this is not credible. Worse, if companies feel obliged to obtain patents, this obligation then creates a very large cost of entry.

The devil's bargain[1] can be called a bargain only if it benefits someone besides the devil. A major justification for the bargain, the encouragement of entry by new people with new ideas into industries with high cost of entry, i.e. high risk, does not apply to software development.[2] Software development is exceptionally cheap, thus low risk.

  1. The cost of equipment is minuscule compared to other business activities: buy a single personal computer and lease an internet connection and you are ready for action.
  2. The cost of training is low: the internet overflows with programming learning materials and open source software projects looking for contributors.

In this regard, software development does not resemble an industrial activity like mining or manufacturing. It is an extremely low risk venture, yet a single programmer can, and frequently does, innovate leaps and bounds beyond the industry state of the art.

The purpose of the patent system, the devil's bargain, is to promote innovation in high risk industries. Software development is a low risk industry. Software innovation happens without patents. In the software realm, the patent system only hinders innovation, because it introduces risk where none existed. When it comes to software, the devil's bargain is no bargain. The justification does not apply, thus we should not be surprised that the system fails to induce the intended effect, and in fact induces just the opposite effect: stagnation.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

References