Difference between revisions of "List of lawsuits"
(→Litigation and threats: * Mirror Worlds v. Apple (2008, USA)) |
(→Litigation and threats: ===2014=== * Intellectual Ventures v. Google (2014, USA)) |
||
(37 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navbox}} | {{navbox}} | ||
− | :''(For analyses of court rulings that define patent law, see [[ | + | :''(For analyses of court rulings that define patent law, see '''[[Court rulings creating precedent]]'''.)'' |
− | Every patent is a legal | + | Every patent is a legal justification to go to court, costing time, money, and legal resources. For the problems causes by [[software patents]], they represent only a very small portion. More serious problems include the way they block [[Harm to standards|compatibility]], block development, create [[patent taxes]], and the legal and licensing costs they generate through [[Harm with neither litigation nor threats|threats which don't go to court]]. |
==Picking a year== | ==Picking a year== | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Litigation and threats== | ==Litigation and threats== | ||
− | The following are articles law suits filed, court cases, and some threats made public. The large majority of [[software patent]] litigation takes place in the [[USA]]. To avoid repetition, only the exceptions to that rule will carry a note of which [[Countries and regions|country]] they took place in. For a more descriptive look at the rulings in the USA, see [[case law in the USA]]. | + | The following are articles law suits filed, court cases, and some threats made public. The large majority of [[software patent]] litigation takes place in the [[USA]]. To avoid repetition, only the exceptions to that rule will carry a note of which [[Countries and regions|country]] they took place in. For a more descriptive look at the rulings in the USA, see [[case law in the USA]]. |
+ | |||
+ | {{also|:Category:Lawsuits and patent aggression}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===2014=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Intellectual Ventures v. Google (2014, USA)]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===2013=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Uniloc v. Red Hat and Rackspace (2013, USA)]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===2012=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[CLS Bank v. Alice (2012, USA)]] | ||
+ | * [[Nokia v. HTC (2012, Germany)]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===2011=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Samsung v. Apple 2011 lawsuits worldwide overview]] | ||
+ | ** [[Samsung v. Apple (2011, USA)]] | ||
+ | ** [[Samsung v. Apple (2011, France)]] | ||
+ | ** [[Apple v. Samsung (2011, Netherlands)]] | ||
+ | * [[Motorola Mobility v. Apple (2011, Germany)]] | ||
+ | * [[S3 Graphics v. Apple (2011, USA)]] | ||
+ | * [[Bedrock v. Google (2011, USA)]] | ||
===2010=== | ===2010=== | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[FlightPrep v. RunwayFinder and others (2010, USA)]] |
+ | * [[Gemalto v. phone manufacturers (2010, USA)]] | ||
+ | * [[Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA)]] | ||
* [[Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA)]] | * [[Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA)]] | ||
* [[Interval Licensing v. 11 big companies (2010, USA)]] | * [[Interval Licensing v. 11 big companies (2010, USA)]] | ||
Line 30: | Line 57: | ||
===2008=== | ===2008=== | ||
+ | * [[Mirror Worlds v. Apple (2008, USA)]] | ||
* [[Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA)]] | * [[Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA)]] | ||
* [[Trend Micro v. Barracuda (2008, USA)]] | * [[Trend Micro v. Barracuda (2008, USA)]] | ||
Line 35: | Line 63: | ||
* [[Symbian v. Comptroller General (2008, UK)]] | * [[Symbian v. Comptroller General (2008, UK)]] | ||
* [[Quanta v. LGE (2008, USA)]] | * [[Quanta v. LGE (2008, USA)]] | ||
+ | * [[Implicit Networks v. many large companies (2010, USA)]] | ||
===2006=== | ===2006=== | ||
Line 43: | Line 72: | ||
===2005=== | ===2005=== | ||
* [[Justsystem v. Matsushita]], (in [[Japan]]) | * [[Justsystem v. Matsushita]], (in [[Japan]]) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===2000=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[NTP v. RIM (2000, USA)|NTP v. Research in Motion]] | ||
===1999=== | ===1999=== | ||
Line 51: | Line 84: | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
− | * [[:Category: | + | * [[:Category:Lawsuits and patent aggression]] |
* [[Reading case law]] | * [[Reading case law]] | ||
* [[Forum shopping]] | * [[Forum shopping]] | ||
Line 65: | Line 98: | ||
{{footer}} | {{footer}} | ||
[[Category:Example software patents|*]] | [[Category:Example software patents|*]] | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Lawsuits and patent aggression|*]] |
Latest revision as of 20:09, 21 January 2014
- (For analyses of court rulings that define patent law, see Court rulings creating precedent.)
Every patent is a legal justification to go to court, costing time, money, and legal resources. For the problems causes by software patents, they represent only a very small portion. More serious problems include the way they block compatibility, block development, create patent taxes, and the legal and licensing costs they generate through threats which don't go to court.
Contents
Picking a year
Picking a year to associate with case is usually difficult since they drag on for years and there can be appeals, changes of venue, and new defendants added. The year mentioned in the names of lawsuit articles refers to the year when the case first hit the news.
Litigation and threats
The following are articles law suits filed, court cases, and some threats made public. The large majority of software patent litigation takes place in the USA. To avoid repetition, only the exceptions to that rule will carry a note of which country they took place in. For a more descriptive look at the rulings in the USA, see case law in the USA.
- See also: Category:Lawsuits and patent aggression
2014
2013
2012
2011
- Samsung v. Apple 2011 lawsuits worldwide overview
- Motorola Mobility v. Apple (2011, Germany)
- S3 Graphics v. Apple (2011, USA)
- Bedrock v. Google (2011, USA)
2010
- FlightPrep v. RunwayFinder and others (2010, USA)
- Gemalto v. phone manufacturers (2010, USA)
- Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA)
- Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA)
- Interval Licensing v. 11 big companies (2010, USA)
- Microsoft v. Salesforce (2010, USA)
- Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)
- Acacia v. Red Hat and Novell (2010, USA)
- Apple v. HTC (2010, USA)
- TecSec v. loads of software companys regarding an encryption patent
- Nokia v. Apple (2010, USA)
2009
- Uniloc vs Microsoft, 2009
- I4i v. Microsoft
- Software Tree vs Red Hat, 2009
- Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009
2008
- Mirror Worlds v. Apple (2008, USA)
- Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA)
- Trend Micro v. Barracuda (2008, USA)
- in re Bilski (2008, USA)
- Symbian v. Comptroller General (2008, UK)
- Quanta v. LGE (2008, USA)
- Implicit Networks v. many large companies (2010, USA)
2006
2005
2000
1999
1993
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Category:Lawsuits and patent aggression
- Reading case law
- Forum shopping
- United Patent Litigation System (UPLS) - proposed system for Europe
- News links - per-year news stories, many of which are about litigation
- Countries with case law:
- Phone patent litigation