ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
Revision as of 19:30, 15 June 2010 by Ciaran (talk | contribs) (* [http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/AmicusBriefs/PUBPAT_KSR_SCt_Brief.pdf Amicus brief by PubPat] (see: Public Patent Foundation))
KSR vs Teleflex was a court case at the US Supreme Court.
This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test, saying that a:
combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results.
For the period 2007-2010, it was the third most cited patent case by the CAFC.[1]
External links
- The ruling: KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 127 S. Ct. 1727 (2007)
- Wikipedia: KSR v. Teleflex
- Amicus brief by PubPat (see: Public Patent Foundation)
Press coverage
- Supreme Court loosens patent 'obviousness' test
- The April 30 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions on Patent Issues
- New Supreme Court patent ruling may create uncertainty
- Supreme Court Makes Holding Patents More Difficult
- KSR v. Teleflex: The Supreme Court’s Big Patent Ruling
