ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007"
m (Reverted edits by 41.72.130.245 (Talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
(The opinion of the court was written by Justice Kennedy.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navbox}} | {{navbox}} | ||
| − | '''KSR vs Teleflex''' was a court case at the [[US Supreme Court]]. | + | '''KSR vs Teleflex''' was a court case at the [[US Supreme Court]]. The opinion of the court was written by [[Justice Kennedy]]. |
This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test, saying that a: | This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test, saying that a: | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | {{reflist}} | |
{{footer}} | {{footer}} | ||
[[Category:Court cases and litigation]] | [[Category:Court cases and litigation]] | ||
Revision as of 13:11, 29 June 2010
KSR vs Teleflex was a court case at the US Supreme Court. The opinion of the court was written by Justice Kennedy.
This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test, saying that a:
combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results.
For the period 2007-2010, it was the third most cited patent case by the CAFC.[1]
External links
- The ruling: KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 127 S. Ct. 1727 (2007)
- Wikipedia: KSR v. Teleflex
- Amicus brief by PubPat (see: Public Patent Foundation)
Press coverage
- Supreme Court loosens patent 'obviousness' test
- The April 30 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions on Patent Issues
- New Supreme Court patent ruling may create uncertainty
- Supreme Court Makes Holding Patents More Difficult
- KSR v. Teleflex: The Supreme Court’s Big Patent Ruling
