ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007"
(This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test. For the period 2007-2010, it was the third most cited patent case at the CAFC.<ref>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/05/top-ten-most-cited-pate) |
(combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
KSR vs Teleflex was a court case at the [[US Supreme Court]]. | KSR vs Teleflex was a court case at the [[US Supreme Court]]. | ||
| − | This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test. | + | This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test, saying that a: |
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the period 2007-2010, it was the third most cited patent case at the CAFC.<ref>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/05/top-ten-most-cited-patent-cases-2007-2010.html</ref> | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 00:35, 2 June 2010
KSR vs Teleflex was a court case at the US Supreme Court.
This case raised the bar for the "obviousness" test, saying that a:
combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results.
For the period 2007-2010, it was the third most cited patent case at the CAFC.[1]
External links
Press coverage
- Supreme Court loosens patent 'obviousness' test
- The April 30 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions on Patent Issues
- New Supreme Court patent ruling may create uncertainty
- Supreme Court Makes Holding Patents More Difficult
- KSR v. Teleflex: The Supreme Court’s Big Patent Ruling
- Wikipedia: KSR v. Teleflex
