ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Ireland"

m (Patents Act 1992: better link)
(Legislation)
(37 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Patents Act 1992==
+
'''Ireland''' is part of the [[European Union]] and is a signatory of the [[European Patent Convention]].
 +
 
 +
==Current issues==
 +
The Taoiseach Brian Cowen launched an Innovation Taskforce in mid-2009.  It's reasonable to guess that this report will make comments about the scope of patenting and the effects of patents on the software industry.  Being made up mostly of decision makers in universities<ref>http://www.ireland.com/home/Taoiseach_establishes_innovation_taskforce/maxi/fast/news/irnews/233165</ref> (a group which is currently under huge pressure to be profitable), there is a risk that royalties and appeasing [[Microsoft]] and [[IBM]] might be valued above [[freedom]], [[innovation]], or the [[economy]] as a whole.  Of course, if people inform the taskforce of these problems, it's possible that they will recommend sensible anti-swpat policies, like the [[Gowers Review of Intellectual Property|Gowers Review]] did in the UK in 2006.
 +
 
 +
Being part of the [[EU]], Ireland is subject to all [[Current events|European-level problems]].
 +
 
 +
The report was published in March 2010 but for some reason is no longer available on the Irish Government website.  A copy can be found here [http://www.umic.pt/images/stories/publicacoes4/Report_of_the_Innovation_Taskforce.pdf Innovation Ireland - Report of the Innovation Taskforce].  Blog post on a guide to the report [https://chrisjhorn.wordpress.com/2010/03/13/a-guide-to-the-innovation-taskforce-report/ A Guide to the Innovation Taskforce Report].
 +
 
 +
==Legislation==
 +
Legislation in Ireland is officially published in English, or sometimes in Irish and English.
 +
 
 +
===Patents Act 1992===
  
 
See: [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1992/en/act/pub/0001/index.html Patents Act 1992]
 
See: [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1992/en/act/pub/0001/index.html Patents Act 1992]
Line 5: Line 17:
 
Most relevant is Chapter II: Patentability[http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1992/en/act/pub/0001/sec0009.html#zza1y1992s9], which says:
 
Most relevant is Chapter II: Patentability[http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1992/en/act/pub/0001/sec0009.html#zza1y1992s9], which says:
  
9.—(1) An invention shall be patentable under this Part if it is susceptible of industrial application, is new and involves an inventive step.
+
====Quoted text====
  
(2) Any of the following in particular shall not be regarded as an invention within the meaning of subsection (1):
+
<blockquote>
 +
9.—(1) An invention shall be patentable under this Part if it is susceptible of industrial application, is new and involves an inventive step.<br />
 +
(2) Any of the following in particular shall not be regarded as an invention within the meaning of subsection (1):<br />
 +
(a) a discovery, a scientific theory or a mathematical method,<br />
 +
(b) an aesthetic creation,<br />
 +
(c) a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business, or a program for a computer,<br />
 +
(d) the presentation of information.<br />
 +
(3) The provisions of subsection (2) shall exclude patentability of subject-matter or activities referred to in that subsection only to the extent to which a patent application or patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such.
 +
</blockquote>
  
(a) a discovery, a scientific theory or a mathematical method,
+
====Remarks====
  
(b) an aesthetic creation,
+
This text is substantially identical or almost identical to Art. 52 of the [[European Patent Convention]].  The differences are only in the order of the words or the stylistic choice of singular or plural for nouns.
  
(c) a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business, or a program for a computer,
+
===2006 amendments===
  
(d) the presentation of information.
+
See: [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2006/en/act/pub/0031/index.html Patents (Amendment) Act 2006]
  
(3) The provisions of subsection (2) shall exclude patentability of subject-matter or activities referred to in that subsection only to the extent to which a patent application or patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such.
+
Most relevant part:
  
==1999 amendments==
+
<blockquote>
 +
3.— Section 9 of the Principal Act is amended—<br />
 +
(a) in subsection (1), by inserting “, in all fields of technology,” after “An invention”, and<br />
 +
(b) by deleting subsections (4) and (5).
 +
</blockquote>
  
See: [http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/bills/1999/6499/b64c99.pdf Patents (Amendment) Bill 1999 as passed by both Houses]
+
The [https://www.patentsoffice.ie/en/ Irish Patents Office] website has a section of [https://www.patentsoffice.ie/en/Patents/What-is-Patentable-/Excluded-Subject-Matter/ Excluded Subject Matter] which includes reference to software. It links to a European Patents Office (pdf) publication on [https://www.patentsoffice.ie/en/Patents/What-is-Patentable-/patents_for_software_en.pdf Patents for software?]
  
Most relevant part(s):
+
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
  
Section 9 of the Principal Act is amended—
+
* [[European Patent Convention]]
  
(a) in subsection (1), by inserting “, in all fields of tech-
+
==External links==
nology,” after “An invention”, and
 
  
==2006 amendments==
+
* http://www.patentsoffice.ie - Ireland's patent office
 +
* [http://www.bailii.org/databases.html#ie The Ireland section of BAILII.org] - links to legislation and case law of Ireland
 +
* [http://ifso.ie/ Irish Free Software Organisation]
 +
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20070209193314/http://swpat.ffii.org/gasnu/ie/index.en.html FFII's (archived) page about Ireland]
 +
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20070507103603/http://www.enn.ie/frontpage/news-9411102.html EU software patent fight rages in Dublin], May 2004, mentions pro-swpat companies lobbying in the Dáil (the principal body of the Irish parliament)
 +
* [http://kwiki.ffii.org/Dail0405En ICT IP Lobbyists Meet Irish Parliament, secure support for Council Presidency Patent Proposal], by [[FFII]]
 +
* [http://eupat.ffii.org/players/ie/ Ireland and Software Patents], by FFII
  
See: [http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/acts/2006/a3106.pdf Patents (Amendment) Act 2006]
+
==References==
 +
{{reflist}}
  
==See also==
 
* [[European Patent Convention]]
 
  
[[Category:Legislation by country]]
+
{{footer}}
 +
[[Category: Countries and regions]]
 +
[[Category: European Patent Convention signatories]]
 +
[[Category: European Union member states]]
 +
[[Category: Legislation by country]]

Revision as of 18:58, 2 February 2016

Ireland is part of the European Union and is a signatory of the European Patent Convention.

Current issues

The Taoiseach Brian Cowen launched an Innovation Taskforce in mid-2009. It's reasonable to guess that this report will make comments about the scope of patenting and the effects of patents on the software industry. Being made up mostly of decision makers in universities[1] (a group which is currently under huge pressure to be profitable), there is a risk that royalties and appeasing Microsoft and IBM might be valued above freedom, innovation, or the economy as a whole. Of course, if people inform the taskforce of these problems, it's possible that they will recommend sensible anti-swpat policies, like the Gowers Review did in the UK in 2006.

Being part of the EU, Ireland is subject to all European-level problems.

The report was published in March 2010 but for some reason is no longer available on the Irish Government website. A copy can be found here Innovation Ireland - Report of the Innovation Taskforce. Blog post on a guide to the report A Guide to the Innovation Taskforce Report.

Legislation

Legislation in Ireland is officially published in English, or sometimes in Irish and English.

Patents Act 1992

See: Patents Act 1992

Most relevant is Chapter II: Patentability[1], which says:

Quoted text

9.—(1) An invention shall be patentable under this Part if it is susceptible of industrial application, is new and involves an inventive step.
(2) Any of the following in particular shall not be regarded as an invention within the meaning of subsection (1):
(a) a discovery, a scientific theory or a mathematical method,
(b) an aesthetic creation,
(c) a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business, or a program for a computer,
(d) the presentation of information.
(3) The provisions of subsection (2) shall exclude patentability of subject-matter or activities referred to in that subsection only to the extent to which a patent application or patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such.

Remarks

This text is substantially identical or almost identical to Art. 52 of the European Patent Convention. The differences are only in the order of the words or the stylistic choice of singular or plural for nouns.

2006 amendments

See: Patents (Amendment) Act 2006

Most relevant part:

3.— Section 9 of the Principal Act is amended—
(a) in subsection (1), by inserting “, in all fields of technology,” after “An invention”, and
(b) by deleting subsections (4) and (5).

The Irish Patents Office website has a section of Excluded Subject Matter which includes reference to software. It links to a European Patents Office (pdf) publication on Patents for software?

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References