ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Intellectual Ventures"
(→External links: * [http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080507/0114581051.shtml Ideas Are Everywhere... So Why Do We Limit Them?]) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | '''Intellectual Ventures''' can most kindly be called an "patent assertion cartel",<ref>http://people.ffii.org/~jmaebe/swpat/restart05/kahin-rationale.pdf</ref> but is often called a [[patent troll]]. | + | '''Intellectual Ventures''' can most kindly be called an "patent assertion cartel",<ref>http://people.ffii.org/~jmaebe/swpat/restart05/kahin-rationale.pdf</ref> but is often called a [[patent troll]]. According to The Economist, in 2009 Intellectual Ventures applied for about 450 patents for its own inventions and they are among world's top 50 patent filers.<ref>http://www.economist.com/business-finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15570585</ref> |
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== |
Revision as of 14:39, 25 March 2010
Intellectual Ventures can most kindly be called an "patent assertion cartel",[1] but is often called a patent troll. According to The Economist, in 2009 Intellectual Ventures applied for about 450 patents for its own inventions and they are among world's top 50 patent filers.[2]
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Patent trolls
- Similar organisations: Blackboard inc., Acacia Research Corporation
External links
- FFII's news about the launch of Intellectual Ventures
- Wikipedia's page on Intellectual Ventures
- BoycottNovell's page on Intellectual Ventures
- Nathan Myhrvold's Intellectual Ventures Using Over 1,000 Shell Companies To Hide Patent Shakedown
- Turning Patents Into ‘Invention Capital’, 2010, New York Times
- That article was a follow-on from IV's blog The Big Idea: Funding Eureka!
- For a rebutal, see Software patents are the problem not the answer
- Ideas Are Everywhere... So Why Do We Limit Them?