Difference between revisions of "IBM"
(→Patent pledges: IBM's pledge has been received positively by the free software community, with Richard Stallman saying "''These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it) |
(reorganise - put the lobbying together) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{navbox}}'''IBM''' is one of the biggest | + | {{navbox}} |
+ | '''IBM''' is one of the biggest lobbyists ''for'' [[software patents]] (along with [[Microsoft]]). | ||
IBM is however against [[business method patents]] (such as the patent at the heard of the [[in re Bilski]] case in the [[USA]]).<ref>http://business.newsfactor.com/news/-Business-Method--Patents-Reviewed/story.xhtml?story_id=003000773V1X</ref> | IBM is however against [[business method patents]] (such as the patent at the heard of the [[in re Bilski]] case in the [[USA]]).<ref>http://business.newsfactor.com/news/-Business-Method--Patents-Reviewed/story.xhtml?story_id=003000773V1X</ref> | ||
− | + | ==Lobbying for software patents== | |
− | == | + | The following are examples of IBM's pro-software-patent lobbying during [[consultations from patent offices, governments, and courts]]. |
− | + | ||
+ | ===[[EU software patents directive]]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | IBM were constantly in the [[European Parliament]] lobbying for software patents. {{help|Need to develop this and add refs; shouldn't be hard}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===[[in re Bilski|Bilski at the CAFC]], 2008, [[USA]]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the 2008 [[in re Bilski]] case, IBM submitted a pro-swpat brief.[http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/bilski.ibm.pdf] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===EPO consultation, 2009, [[Europe]]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | For [[EPO EBoA referral G3-08]], see their amicus brief for the [[Briefs submitted to EPO EBA G3-08|EPO's software patent consultation]] in April 2009. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===[[Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)|Bilski at the Supreme Court]], 2009, USA]]=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Not only did they submit an amicus brief calling for patents on software, but they also lied and said that software patents benefit [[free software]]. See [[Fake representatives of free software#IBM]]. | ||
==Patent pledges== | ==Patent pledges== | ||
Line 20: | Line 36: | ||
In April 2010, IBM sent a seemingly threatening list of patents to the [[free software]] project TurboHercules. However, there was no explicit threat, and no suits were filed. | In April 2010, IBM sent a seemingly threatening list of patents to the [[free software]] project TurboHercules. However, there was no explicit threat, and no suits were filed. | ||
− | == | + | ==Selection of patents held== |
− | + | * [http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090132950%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090132950&RS=DN/20090132950 Real-Time Validation of Text Input Fields Using Regular Expression Evaluation During Text Entry], [http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/05/26/159249/IBM-Wants-Patent-For-Regex-SSN-Validation Slashdot story, 2009] | |
− | |||
==Key people== | ==Key people== |
Revision as of 08:31, 28 June 2010
IBM is one of the biggest lobbyists for software patents (along with Microsoft).
IBM is however against business method patents (such as the patent at the heard of the in re Bilski case in the USA).[1]
Contents
Lobbying for software patents
The following are examples of IBM's pro-software-patent lobbying during consultations from patent offices, governments, and courts.
EU software patents directive
IBM were constantly in the European Parliament lobbying for software patents. Can you help? Need to develop this and add refs; shouldn't be hard
Bilski at the CAFC, 2008, USA
In the 2008 in re Bilski case, IBM submitted a pro-swpat brief.[1]
EPO consultation, 2009, Europe
For EPO EBoA referral G3-08, see their amicus brief for the EPO's software patent consultation in April 2009.
Bilski at the Supreme Court, 2009, USA]]
Not only did they submit an amicus brief calling for patents on software, but they also lied and said that software patents benefit free software. See Fake representatives of free software#IBM.
Patent pledges
- August 2004: IBM pledges not to use its patents against the kernel Linux
- January 2005: Pledge of 500 patents to free software community
IBM's pledge has been received positively by the free software community, with Richard Stallman saying "These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it was a substantial step".[2] It was however noted that the timing of this gesture seems to be part of a PR stunt to appease the free software community during the massive campaigning against the EU software patents directive.[3]
TurboHercules, 2010
- (See: IBM and TurboHercules, 2010)
In April 2010, IBM sent a seemingly threatening list of patents to the free software project TurboHercules. However, there was no explicit threat, and no suits were filed.
Selection of patents held
- Real-Time Validation of Text Input Fields Using Regular Expression Evaluation During Text Entry, Slashdot story, 2009
Key people
- Fritz Teufel, patent department head of IBM in Germany and Europe
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Open Invention Network - of which IBM is a member
- Fake representatives of free software#IBM
External links
References
- ↑ http://business.newsfactor.com/news/-Business-Method--Patents-Reviewed/story.xhtml?story_id=003000773V1X
- ↑ "Nokia's patent announcement next to nothing". http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/45271. "Last year IBM took a significant step forward in cooperation with the free software community, by offering blanket licenses for 500 of its patents to all free software developers. These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it was a substantial step."
- ↑ "IBM accused of hypocrisy over patent collaboration". http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/regulation/2005/01/11/ibm-accused-of-hypocrisy-over-patent-collaboration-39183607/. ""IBM is just being hypocritical because they want to appease the open source community and make themselves popular," said Mueller. "In Europe, IBM is a driving force behind the extension of the scope of patentability with respect to software."