ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "IBM"

(Bilski submissions: update link)
(Patent pledges: IBM's pledge has been received positively by the free software community, with Richard Stallman saying "''These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* August 2004: [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040804221510383 IBM pledges not to use its patents against the kernel Linux]
 
* August 2004: [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040804221510383 IBM pledges not to use its patents against the kernel Linux]
 
* January 2005: [http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/pledgedpatents.pdf Pledge of 500 patents to free software community]
 
* January 2005: [http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/pledgedpatents.pdf Pledge of 500 patents to free software community]
 +
 +
IBM's pledge has been received positively by the [[free software]] community, with [[Richard Stallman]] saying "''These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it was a substantial step''".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/45271|title=Nokia's patent announcement next to nothing|quote=Last year IBM took a significant step forward in cooperation with the free software community, by offering blanket licenses for 500 of its patents to all free software developers. These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it was a substantial step.}}</ref>  It was however noted that the timing of this gesture seems to be part of a PR stunt to appease the free software community during the massive campaigning against the [[EU software patents directive]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/regulation/2005/01/11/ibm-accused-of-hypocrisy-over-patent-collaboration-39183607/|title=IBM accused of hypocrisy over patent collaboration|quote="IBM is just being hypocritical because they want to appease the open source community and make themselves popular," said [[Florian Mueller|Mueller]].  "In Europe, IBM is a driving force behind the extension of the scope of patentability with respect to software.}}</ref>
  
 
==TurboHercules, 2010==
 
==TurboHercules, 2010==

Revision as of 07:48, 28 June 2010

IBM is one of the biggest lobbyist for software patents (along with Microsoft), as can be seen in their amicus brief for the EPO's software patent consultation in April 2009.

IBM is however against business method patents (such as the patent at the heard of the in re Bilski case in the USA).[1]

For information about IBM's 2008 amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the USA regarding Bilski, see Fake representatives of free software#IBM.

Selection of patents held

Patent pledges

IBM's pledge has been received positively by the free software community, with Richard Stallman saying "These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it was a substantial step".[2] It was however noted that the timing of this gesture seems to be part of a PR stunt to appease the free software community during the massive campaigning against the EU software patents directive.[3]

TurboHercules, 2010

(See: IBM and TurboHercules, 2010)

In April 2010, IBM sent a seemingly threatening list of patents to the free software project TurboHercules. However, there was no explicit threat, and no suits were filed.

Bilski submissions

In the 2008 in re Bilski case, IBM submitted a pro-swpat brief.[1]

Key people

  • Fritz Teufel, patent department head of IBM in Germany and Europe

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References

  1. http://business.newsfactor.com/news/-Business-Method--Patents-Reviewed/story.xhtml?story_id=003000773V1X
  2. "Nokia's patent announcement next to nothing". http://www.linux.com/archive/feed/45271. "Last year IBM took a significant step forward in cooperation with the free software community, by offering blanket licenses for 500 of its patents to all free software developers. These are but a fraction of IBM's software patents, but still it was a substantial step." 
  3. "IBM accused of hypocrisy over patent collaboration". http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/regulation/2005/01/11/ibm-accused-of-hypocrisy-over-patent-collaboration-39183607/. ""IBM is just being hypocritical because they want to appease the open source community and make themselves popular," said Mueller. "In Europe, IBM is a driving force behind the extension of the scope of patentability with respect to software."