ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "How to read patents"
("claims") |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Software patents are unreadable) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [[State of the art]] - and what is "prior art"? | * [[State of the art]] - and what is "prior art"? | ||
* [[Design patents]] - which are ''not'' the same as normal patents | * [[Design patents]] - which are ''not'' the same as normal patents | ||
| + | * [[Software patents are unreadable]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 11:00, 16 May 2010
When reading patents, the most important part of a patent are the "claims". These are the ideas that are covered by the patent. The abstract of the patent is just a description. It's a common mistake to read the abstract as a summary - it is not a summary. The abstract just describes the domain in which the claims are situated.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Reading case law
- Searching for patents
- State of the art - and what is "prior art"?
- Design patents - which are not the same as normal patents
- Software patents are unreadable
