ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "How other domains are excluded from patentability"
m (Ciaran moved page Excluding gene patents in the USA to How other domains are excluded from patentability: generalise) |
(This page gathers two things. First, legal wordings so we can see ''how'' other domains get cut free from the patent system. Second, the reasoning of ''why'' legislators and courts got convinced that ''it's right'' for those domains to be excluded. Thi) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | This page gathers two things. First, legal wordings so we can see ''how'' other domains get cut free from the patent system. Second, the reasoning of ''why'' legislators and courts got convinced that ''it's right'' for those domains to be excluded. This should help our work to [[writing a law banning software patents]], and more generally to [[Why abolish software patents|argue for abolition]]. | |
− | This | + | |
− | + | ||
− | |||
==External links== | ==External links== |
Revision as of 17:41, 1 September 2013
This page gathers two things. First, legal wordings so we can see how other domains get cut free from the patent system. Second, the reasoning of why legislators and courts got convinced that it's right for those domains to be excluded. This should help our work to writing a law banning software patents, and more generally to argue for abolition.
External links
- US Government Argues in Court that Isolated Genes are Unpatentable, 30 Oct 2010, Patently-O
- U.S. Says Genes Should Not Be Eligible for Patents, 30 Oct 2010, NYTimes
- Gene Patenting and Free Software: A Breakthrough, 6 Apr 2010, SFLC