ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "How other domains are excluded from patentability"

(* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2010/apr/06/gene-patenting-and-free-software-breaktrhough/ Gene Patenting and Free Software: A Breakthrough], 6 Apr 2010, '''SFLC''')
 
(** [http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/10/30/1140235 Slashdot discussion])
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/10/us-government-argues-in-court-that-isolated-genes-are-unpatentable.html US Government Argues in Court that Isolated Genes are Unpatentable], 30 Oct 2010, '''Patently-O'''
 
* [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/10/us-government-argues-in-court-that-isolated-genes-are-unpatentable.html US Government Argues in Court that Isolated Genes are Unpatentable], 30 Oct 2010, '''Patently-O'''
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/30/business/30drug.html U.S. Says Genes Should Not Be Eligible for Patents
 
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/30/business/30drug.html U.S. Says Genes Should Not Be Eligible for Patents
 +
** [http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/10/30/1140235 Slashdot discussion]
 
* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2010/apr/06/gene-patenting-and-free-software-breaktrhough/ Gene Patenting and Free Software: A Breakthrough], 6 Apr 2010, '''[[SFLC]]'''
 
* [http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2010/apr/06/gene-patenting-and-free-software-breaktrhough/ Gene Patenting and Free Software: A Breakthrough], 6 Apr 2010, '''[[SFLC]]'''
  
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}

Revision as of 21:13, 30 October 2010

This seemingly unrelated topic is of interest because it shows:

  • a reasoning, by the US government, of why certain subject matter is not patentable
  • an interpretation of how the existing legislation should be read to exclude certain subject matter

External links