ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Harm to standards and compatibility"

(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Inequality between small and large patent holders‎)
(why did I call it "behaviour" - it's better to say "functionality", right?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{welcome}}
 
{{welcome}}
Patents harm standards and compatibility by blocking the inclusion of necessary behaviour.
+
Patents harm standards and compatibility by blocking the inclusion of necessary or important functionality.
  
Standards and compatibility are essential for software - moreso than other fields.  If a word processor or a video player cannot read popular document or video formats, it is simply not a functional word processor or video player.
+
Standards and compatibility are essential for software - more so than other fields.  If a word processor or a video player cannot read popular document or video formats, it is simply not a functional word processor or video player.
  
 
==Standards with patent problems==
 
==Standards with patent problems==
Line 49: Line 49:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references />
+
{{reflist}}
  
  
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
{{page footer}}
+
{{footer}}

Revision as of 06:30, 5 November 2010

Patents harm standards and compatibility by blocking the inclusion of necessary or important functionality.

Standards and compatibility are essential for software - more so than other fields. If a word processor or a video player cannot read popular document or video formats, it is simply not a functional word processor or video player.

Standards with patent problems

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

General articles

Specific standards harmed

References