ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "HTML5 and video patents"

(Further analyses afterwards)
m (Grammar/Capitalization correction)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{navbox}}
 
{{navbox}}
HTML is the standard, set by [[w3c]], for how to write webpages. HTML5 was supposed to include a standard way to add video to webpages, but after lengthy discussions about [[software patents]], the drafters announced on June 30th 2009<ref>http://lwn.net/Articles/340132/</ref> that they could find no freely implementable video format to recommend.
+
HTML is the standard set by the [[W3C]] for how to write webpage markup. HTML5 was supposed to include a standard way to add video to webpages, but after lengthy discussions about [[software patents]], the drafters announced on June 30th 2009<ref>http://lwn.net/Articles/340132/</ref> that they could find no freely implementable video format to recommend.
  
 
The two main candidate formats were [[H.264]] and [[Ogg Theora]], but the former is heavily encumbered by patents while the latter's future was deemed questionable because, as [[Google]]'s Chris DiBona said:
 
The two main candidate formats were [[H.264]] and [[Ogg Theora]], but the former is heavily encumbered by patents while the latter's future was deemed questionable because, as [[Google]]'s Chris DiBona said:
Line 11: Line 11:
 
HTML is an open [[harm to standards|standard]] and aims to be patent-free.  Consequently, the risk of patent encumbrances is posing a real problem in extending HTML to provide a standard video interface.
 
HTML is an open [[harm to standards|standard]] and aims to be patent-free.  Consequently, the risk of patent encumbrances is posing a real problem in extending HTML to provide a standard video interface.
  
[[Microsoft]] announced in April 2010 that they will only support the heavily patented Mpeg [[H.264]] for the HTML5 video tag.<ref>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/04/29/html5-video.aspx</ref>
+
[[Microsoft]] announced in April 2010 that they will only support the heavily patented MPEG [[H.264]] for the HTML5 video tag.<ref>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/04/29/html5-video.aspx</ref>
  
 
==Other software patent issues for HTML5==
 
==Other software patent issues for HTML5==
  
In 2007, [[Apple]] claim to have patents covering the "canvas" tag,<ref>http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-March/010129.html</ref> but they later solved this problem by agreeing to license those patent(s) under the [[w3c]]'s royalty-free terms.<ref>http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/40318/status#current-disclosures</ref>
+
In 2007, [[Apple]] claimed to have patents covering the "canvas" tag,<ref>http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-March/010129.html</ref> but they later solved this problem by agreeing to license those patent(s) under the [[W3C]]'s royalty-free terms.<ref>http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/40318/status#current-disclosures</ref>
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
Line 39: Line 39:
 
* August 2009: [http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10305822-92.html Microsoft joins HTML 5 standard fray in earnest] (note: this is after the removal of Ogg Theora)
 
* August 2009: [http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10305822-92.html Microsoft joins HTML 5 standard fray in earnest] (note: this is after the removal of Ogg Theora)
  
Holy Toledo, so glad I cilkced on this site first!
+
===Further analyses afterwards===
 +
* [http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/viewArticle/21/45 Patents and their effect on Standards:
 Open video codecs for HTML5], from IFOSS Law Review, January 2010
 +
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/Nokia.pdf Nokia's 2007 position paper arguing against Ogg Theora in HTML5]
  
 
===General discussion===
 
===General discussion===

Latest revision as of 18:19, 1 January 2014

HTML is the standard set by the W3C for how to write webpage markup. HTML5 was supposed to include a standard way to add video to webpages, but after lengthy discussions about software patents, the drafters announced on June 30th 2009[1] that they could find no freely implementable video format to recommend.

The two main candidate formats were H.264 and Ogg Theora, but the former is heavily encumbered by patents while the latter's future was deemed questionable because, as Google's Chris DiBona said:

Here’s the challenge: Can [T]heora move forward without infringing on the other video compression patents?[2]

A third option discussed was to use software from 20 years ago: MPEG-1.

HTML is an open standard and aims to be patent-free. Consequently, the risk of patent encumbrances is posing a real problem in extending HTML to provide a standard video interface.

Microsoft announced in April 2010 that they will only support the heavily patented MPEG H.264 for the HTML5 video tag.[3]

Other software patent issues for HTML5

In 2007, Apple claimed to have patents covering the "canvas" tag,[4] but they later solved this problem by agreeing to license those patent(s) under the W3C's royalty-free terms.[5]

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Drafters discussion

Press coverage of the announcement

Further analyses afterwards

General discussion

References