Difference between revisions of "Groklaw"
(→External links: * [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091002212330353 Groklaw discusses ESP's Bilski brief to the Supreme Court]) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [http://www.groklaw.net Groklaw] | * [http://www.groklaw.net Groklaw] | ||
* [http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20050402193202442 Groklaw's articles about patents] | * [http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20050402193202442 Groklaw's articles about patents] | ||
+ | * [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091002212330353 Groklaw discusses ESP's Bilski brief to the Supreme Court] | ||
{{page footer}} | {{page footer}} | ||
[[Category:Organisations]] | [[Category:Organisations]] |
Revision as of 21:54, 10 January 2010
Groklaw is a website run by Pamela Jones, a paralegal in the USA. It provides news, comments and archive material on important cases relevant to software law, especially with respect to copyrights and patents. PJ, and hence Groklaw, is a keen advocate of free software and is opposed to software patents.
Articles on ESP Wiki which reference material to be found on Groklaw include:
The case for software patents
Pamela Jones invited the law firm of Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks to write an article for Groklaw, defending business methods and software patents. They came up with The Arguments For Patents for Business Methods and Software-Implemented Inventions. Groklaw naturally disagrees with their position. The End Software Patents campaign mirrored this action, getting an article on the Patently-o blog: Abandoning software patents?.